Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Designing for Interaction: Determining the Most Influential Aesthetic Factors for Effective Visualisation of Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interface and the Management of Information: Visual and Information Design (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13305))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Visualisations offer a variety of novel ways to depict data to a wider range of users. Moreover, they provide the ability to transform raw data into intuitive visual mechanisms for communication. Despite the developments in visualisation techniques, an area of depiction that has struggled to advance is uncertainty. The visualisation of uncertainty offers an additional dimension for the data by presenting confidence and error rates. Whilst nearly all predictive data sets visualised contain uncertainties, there is still little impulse to actively represent uncertainty. A growing area of interest in the visualisation world is the field of aesthetics; the authors ask the question ‘could aesthetics be applied to address the issues surrounding visualising uncertainty’. This paper reports on the design and delivery of a study to evaluate the effectiveness of aesthetics for the depiction of uncertainty. In particular, the evaluation of how to practically determine how we assess the influence of aesthetic dimensions for the presentation of uncertainty. The paper reports on the strategies employed in this study to assess user’s decision around aesthetic designs, whilst determining what aesthetic combinations elicit the most uncertain visual representation. The findings show that certain aesthetic combinations in a line graph visualisation portrayed a higher level of uncertainty than others and that particular combinations triggered affective responses based on how the visualisation influenced/impacted a participant. In detail, how the textured line characteristics can be displayed aesthetically (combined with either emphasis or scale) to encourage optimal user experiences of uncertainty in a diverse participant group. The paper highlights how a user’s decision on which texture was most uncertain can be overturned when presented with varying levels of emphasis and scale. In summary, this paper contributes to a more in-depth understanding of how to design for and evaluate aesthetic uncertainty visualisations that encourage interaction with the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics, 1st edn. Esri Press, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boukhelifa, N., Duke, D.J.: Uncertainty visualization - why might it fail? In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (April), pp. 4051–4056 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520616

  3. Carroll, F.: Designing (for) experiences in photorealistic VR environments. New Rev. Hypermedia Multimedia 16(1–2), 181–194 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/13614561003710250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cawthon, N., Moere, A.V.: The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 637–645 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2007.147

  5. Chen, C.: Top 10 unsolved information visualization problems. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 25(4), 12–16 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2005.91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chuliá, H., Guillén, M., Uribe, J.M.: Measuring uncertainty in the stock market. Int. Rev. Econ. Finan. 48, 18–33 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2016.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Comes, T., Adrot, A., Rizza, C.: Decision-making under uncertainty (2017). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324792356

  8. Dane, E., Pratt, M.G.: Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Acad. Manage. Rev. 32(1), 33–54 (2007). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23463682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Deitrick, S., Edsall, R.: The influence of uncertainty visualization on decision making: an empirical evaluation. In: Riedle, A., Kainz, W., Elmes, G. (eds.) Progress in Spatial Data Handling, pp. 719–738. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-35589-8_45

  10. Deng, L., Wang, G.: Quantitative evaluation of visual aesthetics of human-machine interaction interface layout. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2020, 9815937 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9815937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandhi, P., Pruthi, J.: Data Visualization. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2282-64

  12. Gatto, M.A.C.: Making Research Useful: Current Challenges, vol. 54, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greb, F., Elvers, P., Fischinger, T.: Trends in empirical aesthetics: a review of the journal empirical studies of the arts from 1983 to 2014. Empirical Stud. Arts 35(1), 3–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237415625258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallo, L., Nguyen, T.: Administrative sciences holistic view of intuition and analysis in leadership. Adm. Sci. 12(4), 25 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hohl, M.: From abstract to actual: art and designer-like enquiries into data visualisation. Kybernetes 40(7/8), 1038–1044 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1108/03684921111160278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hullman, J.: Why authors don’t visualize uncertainty. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graph. 26, 130–139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jedynak, P., Ba̧k, S.: Understanding uncertainty and risk in management. J. Intercultural Manage. 12(1), 12–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2478/joim-2020-0030

  18. Joslyn, S., Savelli, S.: Communicating forecast uncertainty: public perception of weather forecast uncertainty. Meteorol. Appl. 17(2), 180–195 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/met.190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Joslyn, S., Savelli, S.: Visualizing uncertainty for non-expert end users: the challenge of the deterministic construal error. Front. Comput. Sci. 2, 1–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.590232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemal, M.: Data Visualization: Methods, Types, Benefits, and Checklist, March 2019. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19618.48324

  21. Kim, C., Self, J.A., Bae, J.: Exploring the first momentary unboxing experience. Des. J. 21(1), 1–22 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1444538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kleineberg, J., Levontin, P., Walton, J.L.: Analysis under uncertainty for decision makers network, pp. 1–29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Koningsbruggen, R.V., Hornecker, E.: “It s just a graph” the effect of post-hoc rationalisation on InfoVis evaluation (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465257

  24. Korporaal, M., Ruginski, I.T., Fabrikant, S.I.: Effects of uncertainty visualization on map-based decision making under time pressure. Front. Comput. Sci. 2(August), 1–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozioł-Nadolna, K., Beyer, K.: Determinants of the decision-making process in organizations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 192, 2375–2384 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krickx, G.A.: The relationship between uncertainty and vertical integration. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 8(3), 309–329 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lang, A.: Aesthetics in information visualization. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces - AVI 2008, p. 384 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Leder, H., Pelowski, M.: Empirical aesthetics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198824350.013.43

  29. Lee, B., Choe, E.K., Isenberg, P., Marriott, K., Stasko, J.: Reaching broader audiences with data visualization. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 40(2), 82–90 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2020.2968244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lenz, E., Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S.: Aesthetic interaction as fit between interaction attributes and experiential qualities. New Ideas Psychol. 47, 80–90 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Levontin, P., Lindsay Walton, J.: Visualising uncertainty a short introduction, vol. 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Li, Q.: Overview of data visualization. In: Embodying Data, pp. 17–47. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5069-0_2

  33. Longstreet, P., Valacich, J., Wells, J.: Towards an understanding of online visual aesthetics: an instantiation of the composition perspective. Technol. Soc. 65, 101536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Marković, S.: Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception 3, 1–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap

  35. Mazzi, G.L., Mitchell, J., Carausu, F.: Data Uncertainties: their Sources and Consequences, pp. 1–33 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. MaçAs, C., Lourenço, N., MacHado, P.: Evolving visual artefacts based on consumption patterns. Int. J. Arts Technol. 12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2020.107693

  37. McCandless, D.: Beautiful News: Positive Trends, Uplifting Stats, Creative Solutions. Harper Design, New York (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Menninghaus, W., et al.: What are aesthetic emotions? Psychol. Rev. 126, 171–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Midway, S.R.: Principles of effective data visualization. Patterns 1(9), 100141 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100141

  40. Moere, A.V., Purchase, H., Leuven, K.U.: On the role of design in information visualization. Inf. Visual. 10, 356–371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611415996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Olalekun, A., Olubunmi, O., Samson, O., Oluwatoyin, F.: Effective management decision making and organisational excellence: a theoretical review. Int. J. Bus. Manage. 9(1), 144–150 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24940/theijbm/2021/v9/i1/bm2101-049

  42. O. Wilke, C.: Fundamentals of Data Visualization. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Padilla, L., Kay, M., Hullman, J.: Uncertainty visualizations. J. Cogn. Eng. Decis. Making 6(1), 30–56 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343411432338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Padilla, L.M., Powell, M., Kay, M., Hullman, J.: Uncertain about uncertainty: how qualitative expressions of forecaster confidence impact decision-making with uncertainty visualizations. Front. Psychol. 11, 1–23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579267

  45. Perkhofer, L., Walchshofer, C., Hofer, P.: Does design matter when visualizing Big Data? An empirical study to investigate the effect of visualization type and interaction use. J. Manage. Control 31(1-2), 55–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-020-00294-0

  46. Pinney, J., Carroll, F., Chew, E.: Valuable insights into the visualisation of uncertainty in data as a means to navigating business risks and making better strategic decisions. In: Cardiff, AMI Conference, p. 22 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Prezenski, S., Brechmann, A., Wolff, S., Russwinkel, N., West, R.L.: A cognitive modeling approach to strategy formation in dynamic decision making. Front. Psychol. 8, 1–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Quispel, A., Maes, A., Schilperoord, J.: Aesthetics and clarity in information visualization: the designer’s perspective. Arts 7(4), 72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7040072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sadiku, M., Adebowale, S., Musa, S., Akujuobi, C.: Data visualization. Int. J. Eng. Res. Adv. Technol. (IJERAT) 2(12), 11–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schoemaker, P.J., Russo, J.E.: Decision-making (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137294678.0160

  51. Schumpeter, J.A.: Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycles. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sinar, E.: Data visualization. In: Tonidandel, S., King, E.B., Cortina, J.M. (eds.) Big Data at Work, 1st edn., Chap. 5, p. 43. Routledge, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2015.1060147

  53. Skov, M., Nadal, M.: A farewell to art: aesthetics as a topic in psychology and neuroscience. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 15, 630–642 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619897963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Smith, A.F., Messenger, M., Hall, P., Hulme, C.: The role of measurement uncertainty in health technology assessments (HTAs) of In Vitro tests. PharmacoEconomics 36(7), 823–835 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0638-1

  55. Sniazhko, S.: Uncertainty in decision-making: a review of the international business literature. Cogent Bus. Manage. 6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1650692

  56. Spiegelhalter, D.: Risk and uncertainty communication. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 4, 31–60 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tufte, E.R.: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2nd edn. Graphics Press, Cheshire (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wassiliwizky, E., Menninghaus, W.: Why and how should cognitive science care about aesthetics? (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.03.008

  59. Wiecek, A., Wentzel, D., Landwehr, J.R.: The aesthetic fidelity effect. Int. J. Res. Mark. 36, 542–557 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yan Yu, Z.: Visualizing uncertainty. Ph.D. thesis, Northeastern University (2018). https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.12.3.07erv

  61. Yu, W., et al.: Visually aware recommendation with aesthetic features. VLDB J. 30(4), 495–513 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-021-00651-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff School of Technologies, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Llandaff Campus, Western Avenue, Cardiff, CF5 2YB, UK

    Joel Pinney & Fiona Carroll

Authors
  1. Joel Pinney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fiona Carroll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Pinney .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Saitama, Japan

    Sakae Yamamoto

  2. Tokyo City University, Tokyo, Japan

    Hirohiko Mori

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pinney, J., Carroll, F. (2022). Designing for Interaction: Determining the Most Influential Aesthetic Factors for Effective Visualisation of Uncertainty. In: Yamamoto, S., Mori, H. (eds) Human Interface and the Management of Information: Visual and Information Design. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13305. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06424-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06424-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06423-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06424-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics