Skip to main content

A Quantitative Study on Mono-Valent Noun and Its Ellipsis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chinese Lexical Semantics (CLSW 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13250))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 454 Accesses

Abstract

Based on large scale data of Chinese with syntactic structure annotation, this paper conducts a quantitative study on the ellipsis phenomena of mono-valent nouns and analyzes the reasons for the ellipsis from the cognitive perspective. We firstly developed the word list by looking up the synonyms of the mono-valent nouns that were cited in The New Compilation of Synonym Cilin (Ci Lin). On this basis, millions of annotated data in Beijing Language and Culture University (BLCU) Treebank 1.0 was selected. Sentences in which mono-valent nouns are omitted or redundant in the syntactic level were screened out with the assistant of specific syntactic tags, so as to verify the ellipsis rules of mono-valent nouns. Finally, from the viewpoint of grammatical metonymy, this paper explains the ellipsis of mono-valent nouns and holds that it is related to the salience of the things they refer to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Link for Baidu Cloud: https://pan.baidu.com/s/1uX_0PCtuP4aTpASosgOUcg

    Password: yjmc.

References

  1. Zhu, D.-X.: Study of Modern Chinese Grammar. Commercial Press, Beijing (1980). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yuan, Y.-L.: Study on the valence of nouns in modern Chinese. Soc. Sci. China 3, 205–223 (1992). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan, Y.-L: A cognitive study of mono-valent nouns. Stud. Chin. Lang. 4, 241–253 (1994). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, S.: Mono-valent noun and its dependent-noun eyntactic expression. J. Southern Yangtze Univ. (Humanit. Soc. Sci). 3(2), 111–115 (2005). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geng, G.-F.: Two issues about bivalent nouns. J. North Forum. 2, 54–56 (2008). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Song, Z.-Y.: On the implication of mono-valent noun in adjective-noun collocations. Li Yun Acad. J. (Lang. Vol.) 1, 150–160 (2013). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, W.-C.: A revisit to properties and relevant syvtactic phenomena of mono-valent nouns. Chin. Teach. World 34(1), 67–80 (2020). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu, L.: A Review on the study about noun’s valent in modern Chinese. Mod. Chin. (Edition Lang. Stud.) 6, 6–8 (2015). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Y., Xing, H.: A cognitive approach to the comparative-point concealing in Chinese “比” sentence. J. Shanghai Univ. (Soc. Sci.) 11(3), 107–112 (2004). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, C.-H.: The ellipsis and redundancy of attribute noun and part noun. J. Stud. Lang. Linguist. 30(2), 93–97 (2010). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, L., Li, M., Xun, E.-D.: A discourse-based Chinese ChunkBank. J. Acta Automarica Sinica (2020). http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.2109.TP.20200521.1558.007.html. (in Chinese)

  12. Zheng, E.-N.: A study on the sememe of appellation in modern Chinese. Master Dissertation, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing (2006). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, W.-D., Kang, S.-Y.: The New Compilation of Synonym Cilin. Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House, Shanghai (2015).(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Su, N.-N.: Modern Chinese abstract noun and the noun collocation. Master Dissertation, Shandong Normal University, Jinan (2014). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, W.-D.: An Introduction to Rhetoric. Shanghai Educational Publishing House, Shanghai (1997).(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shu, D.-F.: Metaphor and metonymy: similarities and differences. J. Foreign Lang. 3, 26–34 (2004). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, R., Lackoff, G., Turner, M.: More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shen, J.-X.: A Metonymic model of transferred designation of de-constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Contemp. Linguist. 1(1), 3–15 (1999). (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is supported by MOE Funds of Humanity and Social Sciences “Quantitative Research on Words Use in Newspaper since late Qing Dynasty” (20YJC740050) and Innovation Fund Project for Chinese and Foreign Postgraduates of BLCU (supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities) (20YCX150).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaoqi Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chi, X., Rao, G., Xun, E. (2022). A Quantitative Study on Mono-Valent Noun and Its Ellipsis. In: Dong, M., Gu, Y., Hong, JF. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13250. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06547-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06547-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06546-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06547-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics