Skip to main content

Optimal Item Pricing in Online Combinatorial Auctions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13265))

  • 1324 Accesses

Abstract

We consider a fundamental pricing problem in combinatorial auctions. We are given a set of indivisible items and a set of buyers with randomly drawn monotone valuations over subsets of items. A decision maker sets item prices and then the buyers make sequential purchasing decisions, taking their favorite set among the remaining items. We parametrize an instance by d, the size of the largest set a buyer may want. Our main result asserts that there exist prices such that the expected (over the random valuations) welfare of the allocation they induce is at least a factor \(1/(d+1)\) times the expected optimal welfare in hindsight. Moreover we prove that this bound is tight. Thus, our result not only improves upon the \(1/(4d-2)\) bound of Dütting et al., but also settles the approximation that can be achieved by using item prices. We further show how to compute our prices in polynomial time. We provide additional results for the special case when buyers’ valuations are known (but a posted-price mechanism is still desired).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    That is, for all sets A with \(|A|>d\), \(v(A):=\max _{B \subset A, |B| \le d} \{v(B)\}\).

  2. 2.

    And quite hard to approximate [22].

  3. 3.

    That is, each buyer has a fixed set T, and values all sets S at \(v(S)\,:=\,I(T \subseteq S) \cdot v(T)\).

  4. 4.

    Throughout the paper M is actually a set and refers to the set of different items.

  5. 5.

    Note that different copies of the same item need to get the same price.

  6. 6.

    In some of the constructions in Sect. 4 we break ties conveniently but all the results hold by slightly tweaking the instances.

References

  1. Assadi, S., Kesselheim, T., Singla, S.: Improved truthful mechanisms for subadditive combinatorial auctions: breaking the logarithmic barrier. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 653–661. SIAM (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Assadi, S., Singla, S.: Improved truthful mechanisms for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In: 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 233–248. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babaioff, M., Lucier, B., Nisan, N., Paes Leme, R.: On the efficiency of the Walrasian mechanism. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 783–800 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baldwin, E., Klemperer, P.: Understanding preferences:“demand types’’, and the existence of equilibrium with indivisibilities. Econometrica 87(3), 867–932 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Cai, Y., Zhao, M.: Simple mechanisms for subadditive buyers via duality. In: Hatami, H., McKenzie, P., King, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2017, Montreal, QC, Canada, 19–23 June 2017, pp. 170–183. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chawla, S., Hartline, J.D., Malec, D.L., Sivan, B.: Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. In: Proceedings of the Forty-second ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 311–320 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chawla, S., Miller, J.B.: Mechanism design for subadditive agents via an ex ante relaxation. In: Conitzer, V., Bergemann, D., Chen, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC 2016, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 24–28 July 2016, pp. 579–596. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dobzinski, S.: Breaking the logarithmic barrier for truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In: Wichs, D., Mansour, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2016, Cambridge, MA, USA, 18–21 June 2016, pp. 940–948. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders. In: Gabow, H.N., Fagin, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Baltimore, MD, USA, 22–24 May 2005, pp. 610–618. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dutting, P., Feldman, M., Kesselheim, T., Lucier, B.: Prophet inequalities made easy: stochastic optimization by pricing nonstochastic inputs. SIAM J. Comput. 49(3), 540–582 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dütting, P., Kesselheim, T., Lucier, B.: An o(log log m) prophet inequality for subadditive combinatorial auctions. In: Irani, S. (ed.) 61st IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS 2020, Durham, NC, USA, 16–19 November 2020, pp. 306–317. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ezra, T., Feldman, M., Gravin, N., Tang, Z.G.: Online stochastic max-weight matching: prophet inequality for vertex and edge arrival models. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 769–787 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feldman, M., Gravin, N., Lucier, B.: Combinatorial auctions via posted prices. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 123–135. SIAM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Feldman, M., Gravin, N., Lucier, B.: Combinatorial walrasian equilibrium. SIAM J. Comput. 45(1), 29–48 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Feldman, M., Svensson, O., Zenklusen, R.: Online contention resolution schemes. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 1014–1033. SIAM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gravin, N., Wang, H.: Prophet inequality for bipartite matching: merits of being simple and non adaptive. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 93–109 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hall, M.: Combinatorial Theory, vol. 71. Wiley, Hoboken (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleinberg, R., Weinberg, S.M.: Matroid prophet inequalities. In: Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 123–136 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krysta, P., Vöcking, B.: Online mechanism design (randomized rounding on the fly). In: Czumaj, A., Mehlhorn, K., Pitts, A., Wattenhofer, R. (eds.) ICALP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7392, pp. 636–647. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31585-5_56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Leme, R.P., Wong, S.C.W.: Computing walrasian equilibria: fast algorithms and structural properties. Math. Program. 179(1), 343–384 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Samuel-Cahn, E.: Comparison of threshold stop rules and maximum for independent nonnegative random variables. Ann. Probab. 12(4), 1213–1216 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trevisan, L.: Non-approximability results for optimization problems on bounded degree instances. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 453–461 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Cristi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Correa, J., Cristi, A., Fielbaum, A., Pollner, T., Weinberg, S.M. (2022). Optimal Item Pricing in Online Combinatorial Auctions. In: Aardal, K., Sanità, L. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13265. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06901-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06901-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06900-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06901-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics