Abstract
Recently, the role of universities is gradually shifting from academic focus towards more entrepreneurial and innovation-oriented. This requires creativity and interaction, in terms of innovation, research and educational activities of universities. The challenge of developing creativity is crucial particularly for countries like Poland, which still do not belong to the leaders in innovation. The aim of this paper is to identify the position of Polish universities in terms of creativity in comparison to other EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). The analysis is carried out using the “knowledge triangle” concept, encompassing involvement of universities in education, research, innovation and entrepreneurship. The analysis covers selected indicators characterizing each of the vertices of the knowledge triangle considered in the context of activities undertaken by universities. It is based on data obtained from Eurostat and OECD databases for the period of 2010–2016.
A comparative analysis of these indicators showed that Poland stands out in the CEE region in terms of the relatively high share of the higher education sector in conducting scientific research and the availability of scientific staff resources. However, this does not translate into the leading position of Polish universities when it comes to creativity measured by citations or the number of patents. Poland's advantages in terms of creativity are only visible in industrial design. Therefore, the effects of the interactions within the “knowledge triangle” in Poland are insufficient to stimulate creativity and broaden the involvement of national actors in global research and innovation networks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
OECD: Innovation in Public Services: Context, Solutions and Challenges. OECD, Paris (2012)
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G.: The Open Book of Social Innovation. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, London (2010)
Soriano, F., Mulatero, F.: Knowledge policy in the EU: from the Lisbon strategy to Europe 2020. J. Knowl. Econ. 1, 289–302 (2010)
Turcinovic, P.: EU knowledge triangle: renaissance or ocean of papers? Donald Sch. J. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 7(3), 272–277 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1293
Veugelers, R., Cassiman, B.: R&D Cooperation between firms and universities, some empirical evidence from Belgian manufacturing. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 23, 355–379 (2005)
European Commission: European Innovation Scoreboard 2019 (2019) . https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/36062
Eurostat: Database. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
OECD: Statistics. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/statistics
Schumpeter, J.: Teoria wzrostu gospodarczego. PWN, Warszawa (1960)
Freeman, C., Soete, L.: The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Continuum, London (1997)
Filion, L.J.: Empreendedorismo: Empreendedores e proprietários-gerentes de pequenos negócios. Revista de Administração [RAUSP] 34(2), 5–28 (1999)
Howkins, J.: The Creative Economy. How People Make Money from Ideas. Penguin Press, London (2002)
Govindarajan, V.: The Three-Box Solution: A Strategy for Leading Innovation. Harvard Business Review, Cambridge (2016)
Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Cummings, B.S. (ed.) Research in Organizational Behavior 1988, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich (1988)
Amabile, T.M., Pratt, M.: The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36, 167–183 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
Haefele, J.W.: Creativity and Innovation. Reinhold Publishing Corporation, New York (1962)
Stojanova, B.: Development of creativity as a basic task of the modern educational system. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2, 3395–3400 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.522
Hossieni, A., Khalili, S.: Explanation of creativity in postmodern educational ideas. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 15, 1307–1313 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.283
Demetrikopoulos, M.K., Pecore, J.L. (eds.): Interplay of Creativity and Giftedness in Science. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2016)
Leite, Y.V.P., de Moraes, W.F.A.: The ability to innovate in international entrepreneurship. Revista de Administração [RAUSP] 50(4), 447–459 (2015)
Balcar, J.: Soft skills and their wage returns: overview of empirical literature. Rev Econ Persp 14(1), 3–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2014-0001
Kautz, T.D., Heckman, J., Diris, R., ter Weel, B., Borghans, L.: Fostering and Measuring Skills: Improving Cognitive and Non‐cognitive Skills to Promote Lifetime Success. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (2014)
Holmberg-Wright, K., Hribar, T.: Soft skills – the missing piece for entrepreneurs to grow a business. Am. J. Manag. Dev. 16(1), 11–18 (2016)
Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (2002)
Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class: Revisited. Basic Books, New York (2012)
Florida, R.: The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. Lib. Educ. 92(3), 22–29 (2006)
Sjoer, E., Nørgaard, B., Goossens, M.: From concept to reality in implementing the knowledge triangle. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 41(3), 353–368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1079812
Maassen, P., Stensaker, B.: The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy logics and policy implications. High Educ. 61(6), 757–769 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9360-4
Unger, M., Polt, W.: The knowledge triangle between research, education and innovation – a conceptual discussion. Foresight STI Gov. 11(2), 10–26 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.10.26
Cervantes, M.: Higher education institutions in the knowledge triangle. Foresight STI Gov. 11(2), 27–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.27.42
Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E., Stern, S.: The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31, 899–933 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
Ulku, H.: R&D, innovation and output: evidence from OECD and nonOECD countries. Appl. Econ. 39(3), 291–307 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500439002
WIPO: Statistical Country Profiles (2018). http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/statistics/country_profile/profile.jsp?code=PL
Innovation Policy Platform: Patent data - The role of universities in technological development (2018). https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/patent-data-role-universities-technological-development
Bonaccorsi, A., Cicero, T., Secondi, L., Setteducati, E.: Are European universities facing the Asian challenge in excellent S&T research? Innov. Growth Policy Brief 10 (2013). https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/i4g-reports/i4g_policy_brief__10_-_excellence_eu_universities.pdf
OECD: OECD Skills Outlook 2017: Skills and Global Value Chains. OECD Publishing, Paris (2017). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273351-en
Bileviciute, E., Draksas, R., Nevera, A., Vainiute, M.: Competitiveness in higher education: the case of university management. J. Compet. 11(4), 5–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2019.04.01
Kostrzewski, M.: One design issue – many solutions. different perspectives of design thinking – case study. In: Uden, L., Hadzima, B., Ting, I.-H. (eds.) KMO 2018. CCIS, vol. 877, pp. 179–190. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95204-8_16
OECD: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015: Innovation for Growth and Society. OECD Publishing, Paris (2015). https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2015-en
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marczewska, M., Weresa, M.A. (2022). Creativity and Innovation in Polish Universities: The Knowledge Triangle Approach. In: Uden, L., Ting, IH., Feldmann, B. (eds) Knowledge Management in Organisations. KMO 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1593. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07920-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07920-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07919-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07920-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)