Abstract
The proportional hazard Cox model is traditionally used in survival analysis to estimate the effect of several variables on the hazard rate of an event. Recently, neural networks were proposed to improve the flexibility of the Cox model. In this work, we focus on an extension of the Cox model, namely on a non-proportional relative risk model, where the neural network approximates a non-linear time-dependent risk function. We address the issue of the lack of time-varying variables in this model, and to this end, we design a deep neural network model capable of time-varying regression.
The target application of our model is the waning of post-vaccination and post-infection immunity in COVID-19. This task setting is challenging due to the presence of multiple time-varying variables and different epidemic intensities at infection times. The advantage of our model is that it enables a fine-grained analysis of risks depending on the time since vaccination and/or infection, all approximated using a single non-linear function. A case study on a data set containing all COVID-19 cases in the Czech Republic until the end of 2021 has been performed. The vaccine effectiveness for different age groups, vaccine types, and the number of doses received was estimated using our model as a function of time. The results are in accordance with previous findings while allowing greater flexibility in the analysis due to a continuous representation of the waning function.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Berec, L., et al.: Real-life protection provided by vaccination, booster doses and previous infection against Covid-19 infection, hospitalisation or death over time in the Czech Republic: a whole country retrospective view. medRxiv (2021). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.10.21267590, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/12/2021.12.10.21267590
Biganzoli, E., Boracchi, P., Mariani, L., Marubini, E.: Feed forward neural networks for the analysis of censored survival data: a partial logistic regression approach. Stat. Med. 17(10), 1169–1186 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980530)17:10<1169::AID-SIM796>3.0.CO;2-D
Cox, D.R.: Regression models and life-tables. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Series B (Methodol.) 34(2), 187–220 (1972). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2985181
Faraggi, D., Simon, R.: A neural network model for survival data. Stat. Med. 1, 73–82 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140108
Fernandez, T., Rivera, N., Teh, Y.W.: Gaussian processes for survival analysis. In: Lee, D., Sugiyama, M., Luxburg, U., Guyon, I., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 29. Curran Associates, Inc. (2016). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2016/file/ef1e491a766ce3127556063d49bc2f98-Paper.pdf
Ishwaran, H., Kogalur, U., Blackstone, E., Lauer, M.: Random survival forests. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1214/08-AOAS169
Katzman, J.L., Shaham, U., Cloninger, A., Bates, J., Jiang, T., Kluger, Y.: DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 18, 1471–2288 (2018)
Kvamme, H., Borgan, Ø., Scheel, I.: Time-to-event prediction with neural networks and cox regression. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20(129), 1–30 (2019). http://jmlr.org/papers/v20/18-424.html
Lee, C., Zame, W., Yoon, J., van der Schaar, M.: DeepHit: a deep learning approach to survival analysis with competing risks. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32(1), April 2018. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/11842
Liestøl, K., Andersen, P.K., Andersen, U.: Survival analysis and neural nets. Stat. Med. 13(12), 1189–1200 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780131202, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.4780131202
Lin, R.S., Horn, S.D., Hurdle, J.F., Goldfarb-Rumyantzev, A.S.: Single and multiple time-point prediction models in kidney transplant outcomes. J. Biomed. Inform. 41(6), 944–952 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.03.005, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046408000439
Luck, M., Sylvain, T., Cardinal, H., Lodi, A., Bengio, Y.: Deep learning for patient-specific kidney graft survival analysis. CoRR abs/1705.10245 (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.10245
Naqvi, S.A.A., Tennankore, K., Vinson, A., Roy, P.C., Abidi, S.S.R.: Predicting kidney graft survival using machine learning methods: prediction model development and feature significance analysis study. J. Med. Internet Res. 23(8), e26843 (2021). https://doi.org/10.2196/26843, https://www.jmir.org/2021/8/e26843
Tang, P., et al.: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in Qatar. Nat. Med. 27(12), 2136–2143 (2021)
Tarkhan, A., Simon, N., Bengtsson, T., Nguyen, K., Dai, J.: Survival prediction using deep learning. In: Greiner, R., Kumar, N., Gerds, T.A., van der Schaar, M. (eds.) Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Survival Prediction - Algorithms, Challenges, and Applications 2021. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 146, pp. 207–214. PMLR, 22–24 March 2021. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v146/tarkhan21a.html
Tartof, S., et al.: Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 398, 1407–1416 (2021)
Topuz, K., Zengul, F.D., Dag, A., Almehmi, A., Yildirim, M.B.: Predicting graft survival among kidney transplant recipients: a Bayesian decision support model. Dec. Supp. Syste. 106, 97–109 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.12.004, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923617302233
Townsend, J., Hassler, H., Wang, Z., Miura, S., Singh, J., Kumar, S., et al.: The durability of immunity against reinfection by SARS-CoV-2: a comparative evolutionary study. Lancet Microbe 2(12), 1407–1416 (2021)
Voysey, M., Clemens, S.C., Madhi, S., Weckx, L., Folegatti, P., Aley, P., et al.: Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: an interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 397, 99–111 (2021)
Yousefi, S., et al.: Predicting clinical outcomes from large scale cancer genomic profiles with deep survival models. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 11707 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11817-6
Zheng, Y., Heagerty, P.J.: Partly conditional survival models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 61(2), 379–391 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00323.x, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00323.x
Zhu, X., Yao, J., Huang, J.: Deep convolutional neural network for survival analysis with pathological images. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 544–547 (2016)
Acknowledgments
Roman Neruda, Petra Vidnerová and Gabriela Suchopárová acknowledge the institutional support of the Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences RVO 67985807. This research was partially supported by the SVV project number 260 575. Gabriela Suchopárová was supported by Charles University Grant Agency project no. 246322.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Suchopárová, G., Vidnerová, P., Neruda, R., Šmíd, M. (2022). Using a Deep Neural Network in a Relative Risk Model to Estimate Vaccination Protection for COVID-19. In: Iliadis, L., Jayne, C., Tefas, A., Pimenidis, E. (eds) Engineering Applications of Neural Networks. EANN 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1600. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08223-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08223-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08222-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08223-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)