Skip to main content

Lower Bounds on \(\beta (\alpha )\)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Revolutions and Revelations in Computability (CiE 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

For an ordinal \(\alpha \), an \(\alpha \)-ITRM is a machine model of transfinite computability that operates on finitely many registers, each of which can contain an ordinal \(\rho <\alpha \); they were introduced by Koepke in [11]. In [4], it was shown that the \(\alpha \)-ITRM-computable subsets of \(\alpha \) are exactly those in a level \(L_{\beta (\alpha )}\) of the constructible hierarchy. It was conjectured in [4] that \(\beta (\alpha )\) is the first limit of admissible ordinals above \(\alpha \). Here, we show that this is false; in particular, even the computational strength of \(\omega ^{\omega }\)-ITRMs goes far beyond \(\omega _{\omega }^{\text {CK}}\). To this end, we prove lower bounds on this computational strength, using a strategy for iterating \(\alpha \)-ITRM-computable operators for \(\eta \) many steps on \(\alpha ^{\eta }\)-ITRMs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the “reset” command for replacing the content of a register by 0 can be carried out by having a register with value 0 and using the copy instruction; for this reason, it is not included here, in contrast to the account in [11].

  2. 2.

    If \(\alpha \) is a successor ordinal, the incrementation operation may lead to the register content \(\alpha \); in that case, the content is replaced by 0. However, only limit values of \(\alpha \) will be considered in this paper.

  3. 3.

    There is also a “weak” model for register computations on \(\alpha \) for which the computation is undefined in this case. However, in this paper, only the strong variant will be considered.

  4. 4.

    I.e., ZF set theory without the power set axiom; for the subtleties of the axiomatization, see [8].

  5. 5.

    More precisely, \(P_{\text {ifs}}^{x}(i)\) will output the i-th element of an infinite branch of \(\mathcal {T}\), for every \(i\in \omega \).

References

  1. Abramson, F.G., Sacks, G.E.: Uncountable gandy ordinals. J. London Math. Soc.-Second Ser. 2, 387–392 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchholz, W.: Iterated inductive definitions and subsystems of analysis: recent proof-theoretical studies (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carl, M.: Ordinal Computability: An Introduction to Infinitary Machines. De Gruyter (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carl, M.: Taming Koepke’s Zoo II: register machines. Ann. Pure Appl. Log. 173, 103041 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Carl, M., Fischbach, T., Koepke, P., Miller, R.G., Nasfi, M., Weckbecker, G.: The basic theory of infinite time register machines. Arch. Math. Logic 49, 249–273 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Carl, M., Galeotti, L.: Resetting infinite time Blum-Shub-Smale-machines. arXiv Logic (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cutland, N.J.: Computability: An Introduction to Recursive Function Theory (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gitman, V., Hamkins, J.D., Johnstone, T.A.: What is the theory ZFC without power set? Math. Log. Q. 62, 391–406 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gostanian, R.: The next admissible ordinal. Ann. Math. Log. 17, 171–203 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jäger, G.: Iterating admissibility in proof theory. Stud. Log. Found. Math. 107, 137–146 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Koepke, P.: Ordinal computability. In: Ambos-Spies, K., Löwe, B., Merkle, W. (eds.) CiE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5635, pp. 280–289. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03073-4_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Koepke, P., Morozov, A.S.: The computational power of infinite time Blum-Shub-Smale machines. Algebra Log. 56, 37–62 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koepke, P., Siders, R.C.: Register computations on ordinals. Arch. Math. Log. 47, 529–548 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacks, G.E.: Higher recursion theory (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our three anonymous referees for their valuable feedback, in particular for pointing out several subtle typos.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merlin Carl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carl, M. (2022). Lower Bounds on \(\beta (\alpha )\). In: Berger, U., Franklin, J.N.Y., Manea, F., Pauly, A. (eds) Revolutions and Revelations in Computability. CiE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13359. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08740-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08740-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08739-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08740-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics