Skip to main content

Comparing Middle-Aged and Seniors’ Preferences Toward Virtual Agents and Android Robots: Is There a Generational Shift in Assistive Technologies’ Preferences?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Assisted Living (ForItAAL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 884))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

The present research aims at investigating effects of participants’ age (middle-aged and seniors) and type of assistive device (female virtual agents vs female android robots) on users’ acceptance. The study involved 4 groups of two middle-aged and two seniors (for a total of 181) participants asked to ex- press their potential acceptance to be assisted in their daily routines by two female android robots/virtual agents. Acceptance was assessed in terms of scores assigned by participants to their willingness to interact with the female agents/robots and pragmatic (PQ), hedonic - identity (HQI), hedonic - feeling (HQF) and attractiveness (ATT) qualities. Video clips of the proposed agents or robots were randomly presented, and after each presentation, participants scored the proposed assistive device by filling either the VAAQ (Virtual Agent Acceptance) or the RAQ (Robot Acceptance) questionnaire. Repeated measures ANOVA were utilized to statistically assess participants’ preferences. Seniors were significantly more open to interact with virtual agents rather than robots, while middle-aged participants were showed slightly more open to interact with robots rather than agents. Participants’ gender significantly affected the evaluation of robots rather than agents’ one, and the appearance of the proposed de- vices (younger toward mature agents, or haired toward hairless robots), strongly affected users’ acceptance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Offermann-van Heek, J., Ziefle, M.: They don’t care about us! Care personnel’s perspectives on ambient assisted living technology usage: scenario-based survey study. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 5, e10424 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beer, J.M., et al.: The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 335–342 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pollack, M.E.: Intelligent technology for an aging population: The use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Mag. 26(2), 9 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. McTear, M., Callejas, Z., Griol, D.: Conversational interfaces: past and present. In: The Conversational Interface, pp. 51–72, Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32967-3

  5. Straßmann, C., Krämer, N.C.: A categorization of virtual agent appearances and a qualitative study on age-related user preferences. In: International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, pp. 413-422. Springer, Cham (2017).. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_51

  6. Esposito, A., et al.: Seniors’ sensing of agents’ personality from facial expressions. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds,) ICCHP 2018. LNISA, vol. 10897, pp. 438–442. Springer, Cham (2018a). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_63

  7. Esposito, A., et al.: Seniors’ acceptance of virtual humanoid agents. In: Italian forum of ambient assisted living, pp. 429–443. Springer, Cham (2018b). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05921-7_35

  8. Esposito, A., et al.: The dependability of voice on elders’ acceptance of humanoid agents. In: INTERSPEECH, pp. 31–35 (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mara, M., Appel, M.: Effects of lateral head tilt on user perceptions of humanoid and android robots. Comput. Hum. Behav. 44, 326–334 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. MacDorman, K.F., Ishiguro, H.: The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interact. Stud. 3, 297–337 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Y.H., Fassert, C., Rigaud, A.S.: Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 54(1), 121–126 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferrari, F., Paladino, M.P., Jetten, J.: Blurring human–machine distinctions: Anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8(2), 287–302 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Esposito, A., et al.: Elders prefer female robots with a high degree of human like- ness. In: 23rd International Symposium on Consumer Technologies (ISCT). IEEE (2019b)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Esposito, A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, Riviello, M.T., Cordasco, G.: How human likeness, gender and ethnicity affect elders’ acceptance of assistive robots. In: Proceedings of 1st IEEE International Conference on Human- Machine Systems (ICHMS) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hassenzahl, M.: AttrakDiff(tm). Internet Resource (2019). http://www.attrakdiff.de

  16. Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(4), 319–349 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Straßmann, C., Krämer, N.C.: A two-study approach to explore the effect of user characteristics on users’ perception and evaluation of a virtual assistant’s appearance. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2(4), 66 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Straßmann, C., Krämer, N.C., Buschmeier, H., Kopp, S.: Age- related differences in the evaluation of a virtual health agent’s appearance and embodiment in a health-related interaction: experimental lab study. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(4), e13726 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamide, H., Mae, Y., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., Arai, T.: Effect of human attributes and type of robots on psychological evaluation of humanoids. In: 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 40–45. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I.: Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, 2009 IROS 2009. October 10–15, 2009, pp. 2563–2568. IEEE, St. Louis, MO. Piscataway, NJ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Alexander, E., Bank, C., Jessica, J.J., Hayes, B., Scassellati, B.: Asking for help from a gendered robot. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2014). 23–26 July 2014, pp. 2333–2338. Cognitive Science Society, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Austin, TX (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., et al.: Measurement of negative attitudes toward robots. Interaction Stud 7, 437–454 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kuo, I.H., et al.: Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots. In: RO-MAN 2009: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. 27 September–2 October, 2009, pp. 214–219. IEEE, Toyama, Japan. Piscataway, NJ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lin, C.H., Liu, E.Z.F., Huang, Y.Y.: Exploring parents’ perceptions towards educational robots: gender and socioeconomic differences. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 43, E31–E34 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N. 769872 (EMPATHIC) and N. 823907 (MENHIR), from the project SIROBOTICS that received funding from Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università, e della Ricerca (MIUR), PNR 2015–2020, Decreto Direttoriale 1735 July 13 2017, and from the project ANDROIDS that received funding from Università della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli” inside the programme V:ALERE 2019, funded with D.R. 906 del 4/10/2019, prot. n. 157264, October 17, 2019.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Esposito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Esposito, A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, M., Cavallo, F., Vinciarelli, A., Cordasco, G. (2022). Comparing Middle-Aged and Seniors’ Preferences Toward Virtual Agents and Android Robots: Is There a Generational Shift in Assistive Technologies’ Preferences?. In: Bettelli, A., Monteriù, A., Gamberini, L. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08838-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics