Skip to main content

Development and Validation of a Progress Test in Occupational Therapy Degree Courses: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning Technology for Education Challenges (LTEC 2022)

Abstract

The aim of this study was the development and validation of a progress test (PT) useful to evaluate the learning progress of occupational therapy students in order to allow the improvement of skill acquisition and the qualitative analysis of teaching and degree course organization. The PT was developed on the basis of didactic plans, teaching modules, and/or scientific-disciplinary sectors (SDS) common to all 12 degree courses in Italy. The reliability of the PT was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha (α) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The efficacy and discrimination of the items were analysed using the facility index and point-biserial correlation (P-Bis), respectively. The PT was composed of 11 areas with a total of 190 items with 5 multiple-choice responses, one of which was correct. Six universities confirmed their participation in the study, and 734 students enrolled in one of the four course years were included in the study. The PT showed excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.95. However, areas 2 and 4 of the PT showed poor intercorrelation with the other areas, with Cronbach’s α values of 0.24 and 0.56. The results highlighted that the PT was quite difficult for occupational therapy students, who achieved a maximum score of 126 out of 190. Test-retest reliability showed ICC values between 0.90 and 1. The PT is a useful tool for the assessment of the learning progress of occupational therapy students, the qualitative analysis of teaching and degree course organization, and the acquisition and time-dependent maintenance of essential knowledge and skills to be evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pillastrini, P., et al.: La possibile trasferibilità del Progress Test nei Corsi di Laurea delle Professioni Sanitarie. Quad. delle Conf. Perm. delle Fac. di Med. e Chir. 44, 1891–1894 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parikh, A., McReelis, K., Hodges, B.: Student feedback in problem based learning: a survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools. Med. Educ. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00994.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albano, M.G., et al.: An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: the Maastricht progress test. Med. Educ. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1996.tb00824.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Enarson, C., Cariaga-Lo, L.: Influence of curriculum type on student performance in the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 and Step 2 exams: problem-based learning vs. lecture-based curriculum. Med. Educ. 5(11), 1050–1055 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.01058.x

  5. Blake, J.M., et al.: Introducing progress testing in McMaster University’s problem-based medical curriculum: psychometric properties and effect on learning. Acad. Med. 71(9), 1002–1007 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lotti, A., Dipace, A.: Dal core competence al core curriculum. In: Editore, A. (ed.) Il futuro della ricerca pedagogica e la sua valutazione (2011). ISBN: 9788866770299

    Google Scholar 

  7. Galeoto, G., Rumiati, R., Sabella, M., Sansoni, J.: The use of a dedicated platform to evaluate health-professions university courses. In: Di Mascio, T., et al. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2018. AISC, vol. 804, pp. 275–284. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98872-6_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Paterniani, A., Farina, I., Galeoto, G., Quaranta, C., Sperati, F., Sansoni, J.: Electronic test of competence administration: qualitative evaluation of students’ satisfaction on telematic platform a cross sectional study. In: Popescu, E., Belén Gil, A., Lancia, L., Simona Sica, L., Mavroudi, A. (eds.) MIS4TEL 2019. AISC, vol. 1008, pp. 47–54. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23884-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Galeoto, G., et al.: Internal consistency and discriminant validity of the TECO in the bachelor’s degree course in physiotherapy at the “sapienza” University of Rome: a cross sectional study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D. (eds.) LTEC 2021. CCIS, vol. 1428, pp. 153–160. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81350-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Galeoto, G., Berardi, A., Pizzi, C., Farina, I., Sansoni, J.: Evaluation of the disciplinary competences of the students of the bachelor’s degree in physiotherapy at “Sapienza” University of Rome through the TECO: a cross-sectional study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D., Sanchez, G., Rodríguez-González, S. (eds.) LTEC 2019. CCIS, vol. 1011, pp. 93–102. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Galeoto, G., Tofani, M., Paterniani, A., Sansoni, J., Farina, I.: Evaluation of the disciplinary competences of the students of the bachelors degree in Nursing at Sapienza University of Rome through the TECO: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Learn. Chang. 13, 1 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bozzolan, M., Lotti, A.: Linee guida per la formazione del fisioterapista. Core Competence. La formazione dei formatori (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministero della sanità. D.lgs. 136/1997 in materia di Regolamento concernente la individuazione della figura e relativo profilo professionale del terapista occupazionale (1997). Available at: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/1997/05/24/097G0168/sg. Accessed 25 march 2022

  14. Johnstone, A.: Effective practice in objective assessment. LTSN Phys. Sci. Pract. Guid. 6, 113 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. McAlpine, M.: A summary of methods of item analysis (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kornbrot, D.: Point biserial correlation. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LeBlanc, V., Cox, M.A.A.: interpretation of the point-biserial correlation coefficient in the context of a school examination. Quant. Methods Psychol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.13.1.p046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wrigley, W., Van Der Vleuten, C.P., Freeman, A., Muijtjens, A.: A systemic framework for the progress test: strengths, constraints and issues: AMEE Guide No. 71. Med. Teach. 34(9), 683–697 (2012).https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.704437

  19. Schuwirth, L.W.T., Van Der Vleuten, C.P.M.: The use of progress testing. Perspect. Med. Educ. 1, 24–30 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heeneman, S., Schut, S., Donkers, J., van der Vleuten, C., Muijtjens, A.: Embedding of the progress test in an assessment program designed according to the principles of programmatic assessment. Med. Teach. 39, 44–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1230183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tio, R.A., Schutte, B., Meiboom, A.A., Greidanus, J., Dubois, E.A., Bremers, A.J.A.: The progress test of medicine: the Dutch experience. Perspect. Med. Educ. 5(1), 51–55 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0237-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Galeoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Panuccio, F., Galeoto, G., Tofani, M., Marquez, M.A., Celli, L., Berardi, A. (2022). Development and Validation of a Progress Test in Occupational Therapy Degree Courses: A Cross-Sectional Study. In: Uden, L., Liberona, D. (eds) Learning Technology for Education Challenges. LTEC 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1595. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08890-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08889-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08890-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics