Abstract
This paper reports an evaluation on the effectiveness of hybrid teaching from the perspective of academics. A questionnaire survey was conducted, which was participated by a total of 86 academic staff from a university in Hong Kong. Based on their experience in hybrid teaching for more than one semester, feedback from the academics was collected which cover their responses on students’ learning effectiveness, experience in delivering hybrid teaching, and potential areas of improvement of the hybrid teaching practice. Feedback from the participating academics reveals an overall high level of readiness of them and their students in relation to handling technical matters and access of hybrid class materials. However, they reported that the students attending class online tended to have a lower level of learning motivation, engagement, and interaction with others compared with those attending class face-to-face. They also expressed the challenges in hybrid teaching, such as an increased workload for class preparation, difficulties in design of interactive teaching, monitoring of students’ progress, and paying attention to both face-to-face and online students simultaneously. They tended to prefer face-to-face teaching to hybrid teaching, and suggested ways to improve hybrid teaching such as the provision of hardware and software support and relevant professional development for enhancing students’ engagement online. The findings of this study contribute to revealing the challenges and potential areas for improving the practice of hybrid teaching, as well as the support which could help academics to deliver teaching in the hybrid mode effectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Miller, A.N., Sellnow, D.D., Strawser, M.G.: Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Commun. Educ. 70(2), 202–204 (2021)
Smith, K.D.: Is it face time or structure and accountability that matter? Moving from a flipped to a flipped/hybrid classroom. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 13(2), 609–621 (2021)
Linder, K.E.: Fundamentals of hybrid teaching and learning. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 2017(149), 11–18 (2017)
Aly, I.: Performance in an online introductory course in a hybrid classroom setting. Can. J. High. Educ. 43(2), 85–99 (2013)
Beatty, B.J. (ed.): Hybrid-flexible Course Design. EdTech Books (2019)
Chen, J., Epplin, M.: Incorporating innovative technology to transform teaching and learning corporate finance in the hybrid classroom. Int. J. Account. Inf. Sci. Leadership 4(10), 86–100 (2011)
Davidson, S.C., Metzger, R., Lindgren, K.S.: A hybrid classroom-online curriculum format for RN-BSN students: cohort support and curriculum structure improve graduation rates. J. Contin. Educ. Nurs. 42(5), 223–232 (2011)
Harrington, A.M.: Problematizing the hybrid classroom for ESL/EFL students. TESL_EJ 14(3) (2010). http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume14/ej55/ej55a3/
Willis, M.H., Frigini, L.A., Lin, J., Wynne, D.M., Spulveda, K.A.: Clinical decision support at the point-of-order entry: an education simulation pilot with medical students. Acad. Radiol. 23(10), 1309–1318 (2016)
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., Depaepe, F.: A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learn. Environ. Res. 23(3), 269–290 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Raes, A., Vanneste, P., Pieters, M., Windey, I., Van Den Noortgat, W., Depaepe, F.: Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: an investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Comput. Educ. 143, 103682 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103682
Gao, W.: On hybrid teaching model in ideological and political course in colleges and universities. J. Front. Educ. Res. 1(5), 118–122 (2021)
Wu, G., Zheng, J., Zhai, J.: Individualized learning evaluation model based on hybrid teaching. Int. J. Electric. Eng. Educ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720920983999
Keiper, M.C., White, A., Carlson, C.D., Lupinek, J.M.: Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. J. Educ. Bus. 96(6), 343–351 (2021)
El Refae, G.A., Kaba, A., Eletter, S.: Distance learning during COVID-19 pandemic: satisfaction, opportunities and challenges as perceived by faculty members and students. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 18(3), 298–318 (2021)
Lo, C.M., Han, J., Wong, E.S.W., Tang, C.C.: Flexible learning with multicomponent blended learning mode for undergraduate chemistry courses in the pandemic of COVID-19. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 18(2), 175–188 (2021)
Deshmukh, J.: Speculations on the post-pandemic university campus – a global inquiry. J. Arch. Res. 15(1), 131–147 (2021)
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B.L.: Adopting HyFlex in higher education in response to COVID-19: students’ perspectives. Open Learn. J. Open Dist. e-Learn. 36(3), 231–244 (2021)
Elkhatat, A.M., Al-Muhtaseb, S.A.: Hybrid online-flipped learning pedagogy for teaching laboratory courses to mitigate the pandemic COVID-19 confinement and enable effective sustainable delivery: Investigation of attaining course learning outcome. SN Soc. Sci. 1(113) (2021)
Bao, L., Yu, P.: Evaluation method of online and offline hybrid teaching quality of physical education based on mobile edge computing. Mobile Networks Appl. 26, 2188–2198 (2021)
Shu, J., Wan, B., Li, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, L., Liu, H.: Exploration of hybrid teaching of software engineering on StarC. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L.-F., Yang, H., Fong, J., Kwan, R. (eds.) ICHL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9167, pp. 94–105. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20621-9_8
Banack, H.R., Lesko, C.R., Whitcomb, B.C., Kobayashi, L.C.: Teaching epidemiology online. Am. J. Epidemiol. 190(7), 1183–1189 (2021)
Yang, Y., Zhang, Q., Liu, B., Wang, L., Kong, X.: Case design of linear algebra hybrid teaching model under problem-based learning. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 9(9), 618–622 (2019)
Kesser, G., Stewart, T.: Voices: Online and Hybrid Classroom Education. TESOL Press, Alexandria, VA (2018)
Wong, L., Tatnall, A., Burgess, S.: A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education + Training 56(2/3), 233–251 (2014)
OECD: Guide to measuring the information society. Working Party on Indicators for the Information Society, Committee for Information, Computer and Communications Policy, Paris (2005)
Tang, Y.M., et al.: Comparative analysis of student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Comput. Educ. 168, 104211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211
Chui H.L., Au-Yeung H.K.C., Cheng G.: Reflective practice with digital portfolio for teacher readiness and maturation of prospective teacher within the TPACK framework. In Li, K.C. et al. (eds.) Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology. CCIS, vol. 494, pp. 156–162, Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7_16
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was partially supported by a grant from Hong Kong Metropolitan University (2021/011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, K.C., Wong, B.T.M., Kwan, R., Wu, M.M.F., Cheung, S.K.S. (2022). Evaluation of Hybrid Teaching Effectiveness: The Perspective of Academics. In: Li, R.C., Cheung, S.K.S., Ng, P.H.F., Wong, LP., Wang, F.L. (eds) Blended Learning: Engaging Students in the New Normal Era. ICBL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13357. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08939-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08939-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08938-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08939-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)