Skip to main content

Adaptive Unsupervised Learning with Enhanced Feature Representation for Intra-tumor Partitioning and Survival Prediction for Glioblastoma

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (BrainLes 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 12962))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 6243 Accesses

Abstract

Glioblastoma is profoundly heterogeneous in regional microstructure and vasculature. Characterizing the spatial heterogeneity of glioblastoma could lead to more precise treatment. With unsupervised learning techniques, glioblastoma MRI-derived radiomic features have been widely utilized for tumor sub-region segmentation and survival prediction. However, the reliability of algorithm outcomes is often challenged by both ambiguous intermediate process and instability introduced by the randomness of clustering algorithms, especially for data from heterogeneous patients.

In this paper, we propose an adaptive unsupervised learning approach for efficient MRI intra-tumor partitioning and glioblastoma survival prediction. A novel and problem-specific Feature-enhanced Auto-Encoder (FAE) is developed to enhance the representation of pairwise clinical modalities and therefore improve clustering stability of unsupervised learning algorithms such as K-means. Moreover, the entire process is modelled by the Bayesian optimization (BO) technique with a custom loss function that the hyper-parameters can be adaptively optimized in a reasonably few steps. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach can produce robust and clinically relevant MRI sub-regions and statistically significant survival predictions.

C. Li—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behrens, T.E., et al.: Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn. Resonan. Med. Off. J. Int. Soc. Magn. Resonan. Med. 50(5), 1077–1088 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beig, N., et al.: Radiogenomic-based survival risk stratification of tumor habitat on Gd-T1w MRI is associated with biological processes in glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 26(8), 1866–1876 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brochu, E., Cora, V.M., De Freitas, N.: A tutorial on Bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions, with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1012.2599 (2010)

  4. Dextraze, K., et al.: Spatial habitats from multiparametric MR imaging are associated with signaling pathway activities and survival in glioblastoma. Oncotarget 8(68), 112992 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., Smith, S.: Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage 17(2), 825–841 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Leone, J., Zwenger, A.O., Leone, B.A., Vallejo, C.T., Leone, J.P.: Overall survival of men and women with breast cancer according to tumor subtype. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 42(2), 215–220 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, C., et al.: Decoding the interdependence of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to reveal patient subgroups correlated with survivals. Neoplasia 21(5), 442–449 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, C., et al.: Multi-parametric and multi-regional histogram analysis of MRI: modality integration reveals imaging phenotypes of glioblastoma. Eur. Radiol. 29(9), 4718–4729 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, C., et al.: Intratumoral heterogeneity of glioblastoma infiltration revealed by joint histogram analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. Neurosurgery 85(4), 524–534 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, C., et al.: Low perfusion compartments in glioblastoma quantified by advanced magnetic resonance imaging and correlated with patient survival. Radiother. Oncol. 134, 17–24 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangla, R., et al.: Correlation between progression free survival and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion in WHO grade III glioma subtypes. J. Neurooncol. 116(2), 325–331 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1298-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meacham, C.E., Morrison, S.J.: Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 501(7467), 328–337 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meilă, M.: Comparing clusterings by the variation of information. In: Schölkopf, B., Warmuth, M.K. (eds.) COLT-Kernel 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2777, pp. 173–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45167-9_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer-Bäse, A., Saalbach, A., Lange, O., Wismüller, A.: Unsupervised clustering of fMRI and MRI time series. Biomed. Sig. Process. Control 2(4), 295–310 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohanty, A.K., Beberta, S., Lenka, S.K.: Classifying benign and malignant mass using GLCM and GLRLM based texture features from mammogram. Int. J. Eng. Res. Appl. 1(3), 687–693 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nowosad, J., Stepinski, T.F.: Information theory as a consistent framework for quantification and classification of landscape patterns. Landscape Ecol. 34(9), 2091–2101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00830-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park, J.E., Kim, H.S., Kim, N., Park, S.Y., Kim, Y.H., Kim, J.H.: Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in multiparametric physiologic MRI is associated with patient outcomes in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 27(1), 237–245 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Paszke, A., et al.: Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 32, 8026–8037 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patel, E., Kushwaha, D.S.: Clustering cloud workloads: K-means vs gaussian mixture model. Procedia Comput. Sci. 171, 158–167 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pena, A., Green, H., Carpenter, T., Price, S., Pickard, J., Gillard, J.: Enhanced visualization and quantification of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging using the p: q tensor decomposition. Br. J. Radiol. 79(938), 101–109 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasmussen, C.E.: Gaussian processes in machine learning. In: Bousquet, O., von Luxburg, U., Rätsch, G. (eds.) ML -2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3176, pp. 63–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28650-9_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sala, E., et al.: Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics, and habitat imaging. Clin. Radiol. 72(1), 3–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, S.M., et al.: Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23, S208–S219 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P.: Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.2944 (2012)

  25. Sottoriva, A., et al.: Intratumor heterogeneity in human glioblastoma reflects cancer evolutionary dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(10), 4009–4014 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Syed, A.K., Whisenant, J.G., Barnes, S.L., Sorace, A.G., Yankeelov, T.E.: Multiparametric analysis of longitudinal quantitative MRI data to identify distinct tumor habitats in preclinical models of breast cancer. Cancers 12(6), 1682 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Griethuysen, J.J., et al.: Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Can. Res. 77(21), e104–e107 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Von Luxburg, U.: Clustering stability: an overview. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 2(3), 235–274 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, J., et al.: Unsupervised clustering of quantitative image phenotypes reveals breast cancer subtypes with distinct prognoses and molecular pathways. Clin. Cancer Res. 23(13), 3334–3342 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, J., Gong, G., Cui, Y., Li, R.: Intra-tumor partitioning and texture analysis of DCE-MRI identifies relevant tumor subregions to predict pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J. Magn. Resonan. Imaging (JMRI) 44(5), 1107 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Xia, W., et al.: Radiogenomics of hepatocellular carcinoma: multiregion analysis-based identification of prognostic imaging biomarkers by integrating gene data-a preliminary study. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(3), 035044 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, L.: Dirac delta function of matrix argument. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1–28 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

5 Appendix

5 Appendix

1.1 5.1 Details of Dataset and Imagine Processing

Patients with surgical resection (July 2010–August 2015) were consecutively recruited, with data prospectively collected by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) central review. All glioblastoma patients underwent pre-operative 3D MPRAGE (pre-contrast T1 and T1C), T2-weighted FLAIR, pMRI and dMRI sequences. All patients have a radiogical diagnosis of de novo glioblastoma, aged 18 to 75, eligible for craniotomy and radiotherapy, and all images resolution were resampled to \(1\times 1 \times 1\,\mathrm{{m}}^3\).

Co-registration of the images was accomplished using the linear registration tool (FLIRT) included in the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain Software Library (FSL) v5.0.0 (Oxford, UK) [5, 23]. NordicICE was used to process dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), one of the most frequently utilised perfusion methods (NordicNeuroLab). The arterial input function was automatically defined. The diffusion toolbox in FSL was used to process the diffusion images (DTI) [1]. The isotropic (p) and anisotropic (q) components were computed after normalisation and eddy current correction [20].

1.2 Details for Clinical Features

In this study, through the BO, the tumor were divided into 5 sub-regions as \(\{\mathbf {P}_n\}_{n=1}^N\) from \(\{\mathbf {Z}_{m^{\prime }}\}_{m^{\prime }=1}^M\), the features processed by the well-trained FAE, where \(\mathbf {P}_n = \{\mathbf {p}_i\}_{i=1}^I\), \(\mathbf {p}_i \in \{1,2,3,4,5\}\) denotes the sub-region labels for each pixel. Rather than representing the numerical grey value of images, the value of each \(\mathbf {p}_i\) represents sub-region labels, rendering the majority of features in the GLCM and GLRLM families invalid. Finally, the Table 2 summarises the selected features which remain meaningful for the label matrix. Eventually, the clinical features \(\{\mathbf {F}_n \}_{n=1}^N\), where \(\mathbf {F}_n \in {\mathbb {R}}^{11 \times 1}\) include 9 spatial characteristics in Table 2 and the fraction of 2 significant sub-regions.

Table 2. Clinical features from GLCM matrix of size \(N_g \times N_g\) and GLRLM matrix of size \(N_g \times N_r\) family including Relative mutual information(RMI), Entropy, Joint Energy, Informational Measure of Correlation(IMC), Long Run Emphasis(LRE), Short Run Emphasis(SRE), Run Variance(RV) and Run Entropy(RE). \(p(i,j|\theta )\) in the formula column describes the probability of the (ij)th elements of matrices along angle \(\theta \), \(\mu =\sum _{i=1}^{N_g}\sum _{j=1}^{N_r}p(i,j|\theta )i\) denotes the average run length of GLRLM matrix [15].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, Y., Li, C., Wei, Y., Price, S., Schönlieb, CB., Chen, X. (2022). Adaptive Unsupervised Learning with Enhanced Feature Representation for Intra-tumor Partitioning and Survival Prediction for Glioblastoma. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S. (eds) Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08998-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08999-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics