Skip to main content

Modeling Multi-annotator Uncertainty as Multi-class Segmentation Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries (BrainLes 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 12962))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is a monotonous, time-consuming, and costly task performed by highly skilled medical annotators. Despite adequate training, the intra- and inter-annotator variations results in significantly differing segmentations. If the variations arise from the uncertainty of the segmentation task, due to poor image contrast, lack of expert consensus, etc., then the algorithms for automatic segmentation should learn to capture the annotator (dis)agreements. In our approach we modeled the annotator (dis)agreement by aggregating the multi-annotator segmentations to reflect the uncertainty of the segmentation task and formulated the segmentation as multi-class pixel classification problem within an open source convolutional neural architecture nnU-Net. Validation was carried out for a wide range of imaging modalities and segmentation tasks as provided by the 2020 and 2021 QUBIQ (Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification) challenges. We achieved high quality segmentation results, despite a small set of training samples, and at time of this writing achieved an overall third and sixth best result on the respective QUBIQ 2020 and 2021 challenge leaderboards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    September 9, 2021.

References

  1. Hu, S., Worrall, D., Knegt, S., Veeling, B., Huisman, H., Welling, M.: Supervised uncertainty quantification for segmentation with multiple annotations. arXiv:1907.01949 [cs, stat], July 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.01949

  2. Isensee, F., Jäger, P.F., Kohl, S.A.A., Petersen, J., Maier-Hein, K.H.: Automated design of deep learning methods for biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 18(2), 203–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z, http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.08128, arXiv: 1904.08128 version: 2

  3. Isensee, F., et al.: nnU-Net: self-adapting framework for U-net-based medical image segmentation. arXiv:1809.10486 [cs], September 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.10486

  4. Jungo, A., Meier, R., Ermis, E., Herrmann, E., Reyes, M.: Uncertainty-driven sanity check: application to postoperative brain tumor cavity segmentation. arXiv:1806.03106 [cs], June 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.03106

  5. Karimi, D., Dou, H., Warfield, S.K., Gholipour, A.: Deep learning with noisy labels: exploring techniques and remedies in medical image analysis. Med. Image Anal. 65, 101759 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2020.101759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohl, S.A.A., et al.: A probabilistic U-net for segmentation of ambiguous images. arXiv:1806.05034 [cs, stat], January 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.05034

  7. Lampert, T.A., Stumpf, A., Gançarski, P.: An empirical study into annotator agreement, ground truth estimation, and algorithm evaluation. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 25(6), 2557–2572 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2016.2544703, http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0426

  8. Langerak, T.R., van der Heide, U.A., Kotte, A.N.T.J., Viergever, M.A., van Vulpen, M., Pluim, J.P.W.: Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE). IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(12), 2000–2008 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2010.2057442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Litjens, G., Debats, O., van de Ven, W., Karssemeijer, N., Huisman, H.: A pattern recognition approach to zonal segmentation of the prostate on MRI. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7511, pp. 413–420. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33418-4_51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Quantification of Uncertainties in Biomedical Image Quantification Challenge 2021. https://qubiq21.grand-challenge.org/. Accessed 11 Aug 2021

  11. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv:1505.04597 [cs], May 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.04597

  12. Tanno, R., Saeedi, A., Sankaranarayanan, S., Alexander, D.C., Silberman, N.: Learning from noisy labels by regularized estimation of annotator confusion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2019

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warfield, S.K., Zou, K.H., Wells, W.M.: Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23(7), 903–921 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.828354, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1283110/

  14. Zhang, Y., et al.: U-net-and-a-half: convolutional network for biomedical image segmentation using multiple expert-driven annotations. arXiv:2108.04658 [cs], August 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.04658

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lara Dular .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Žukovec, M., Dular, L., Špiclin, Ž. (2022). Modeling Multi-annotator Uncertainty as Multi-class Segmentation Problem. In: Crimi, A., Bakas, S. (eds) Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12962. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08999-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08998-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08999-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics