Skip to main content

Ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman to Secure Data Exchange in Internet of Medical Things

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Trends in Cybersecurity Applications
  • 609 Accesses

Abstract

The COVID-19 epidemic has accelerated the deployment of remote healthcare monitoring with the overload of hospitals with patients requiring immediate care and oxygen therapy. To unload hospitals, several medical interventions have been postponed, and the places occupied by patients kept under monitoring have been freed up and replaced by remote monitoring. Some COVID-19 patients have been offered home oxygen therapy with remote monitoring using the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). The medical data has stringent security requirements for exchanged data between connected objects. In this chapter, we propose a new framework to secure the collected data of healthcare monitoring using the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT). In spite of their deployment, these devices are vulnerable to several cyber-attacks, ranging from unauthorized access to private medical data to data modification and injection. These attacks can compromise the privacy of the monitored patient, reduce the reliability of the monitoring system, and may harm the life of monitored patient. In this chapter, we propose a new framework to detect attacks and secure the communications in IoMT. To prevent eavesdropping and modification attacks, we propose the Elliptic Curves Diffie-Hellman Ephemeral (ECDHE) to derive a session key used to provide confidentiality and authenticity. To detect injected measurements, flooding triggered by compromised devices and medical changes in physiological data, we applied the sequential change point detection algorithm Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) followed by a boxplot. Our experimental results show that our approach is able to increase the reliability and the accuracy of remote monitoring system, while reducing the false alarms triggered by injected measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Fiaidhi, S. Mohammed, Security and vulnerability of extreme automation systems: the IoMT and IoA case studies. IT Professional 21(4), 48–55 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Thamilarasu, A. Odesile, A. Hoang, An intrusion detection system for internet of medical things. IEEE Access 8, 181560–181576 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Hatzivasilis, O. Soultatos, S. Ioannidis, C. Verikoukis, G. Demetriou, C. Tsatsoulis, Review of security and privacy for the internet of medical things (IoMT), in 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS) (2019), pp. 457–464

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Koutras, G. Stergiopoulos, T. Dasaklis, P. Kotzanikolaou, D. Glynos, C. Douligeris, Security in IoMT communications: a survey. Sensors 20(17), 4828 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bluetooth SIG. Bluetooth Radio Versions. https://www.bluetooth.com/learn-about-bluetooth/radio-versions/, Last visited: February 2022

  6. Australian Government Autralian Cyber Security Center. Information Security Manual. https://www.cyber.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-03/22.%20ISM%20-%20Guidelines%20for%20Cryptography%20%28March%202022%29.pdf, March 2022

  7. R. Killick, I. Eckley, changepoint: an R package for changepoint analysis. J. Statist. Softw. 58(3), 1–19 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Pallavi, V.A. Narayanan, An overview of practical attacks on BLE based IOT devices and their security, in 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing Communication Systems (ICACCS’19) (2019), pp. 694–698

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Sevier, A. Tekeoglu, Analyzing the security of bluetooth low energy, in International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC’19) (2019), pp. 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. Ren, Bluetooth Pairing Part 3 – Low Energy Legacy Pairing Passkey Entry (2016). https://www.bluetooth.com/blog/bluetooth-pairing-passkey-entry/

  11. K. Lounis, M. Zulkernine, Bluetooth low energy makes “Just Works” Not Work, in 3rd Cyber Security in Networking Conference (CSNet’19) (2019), pp. 99–106

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Cominelli, P. Patras, F. Gringoli, One GPU to snoop them all: a full-band bluetooth low energy sniffer, in Mediterranean Communication and Computer Networking Conference (MedComNet’20) (2020), pp. 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wencheng Sun, Zhiping Cai, Yangyang Li, Fang Liu, Shengqun Fang, Guoyan Wang, “Security and Privacy in the Medical Internet of Things: A Review”, Security and Communication Networks, vol. 2018, Article ID 5978636, 9 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5978636

  14. T. Yaqoob, H. Abbas, M. Atiquzzaman, Security vulnerabilities, attacks, countermeasures, and regulations of networked medical devices – a review. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 21(4), 3723–3768 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H.A.M. Puat, N.A. Abd Rahman, IoMT: a review of pacemaker vulnerabilities and security strategy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1712(1), 012009 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Lahmadi, A. Duque, N. Heraief, J. Francq, MitM attack detection in BLE networks using reconstruction and classification machine learning techniques, in 2nd Workshop on Machine Learning for Cybersecurity (MLCS’20) (2020), pp. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  17. S.F. Aghili, H. Mala, M. Shojafar, P. Peris-Lopez, LACO: lightweight three-factor authentication, access control and ownership transfer scheme for e-health systems in IoT. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 96, 410–424 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M.F. Ayub, M.A. Saleem, I. Altaf, K. Mahmood, S. Kumari, Fuzzy extraction and PUF based three party authentication protocol using USB as mass storage device. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 55, 102585 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. U. Gulen, S. Baktir, Elliptic curve cryptography for wireless sensor networks using the number theoretic transform. Sensors 20(5), 1507 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.I. Ahmed, G. Kannan, Secure end to end communications and data analytics in IoT integrated application using IBM Watson IoT platform. Wirel. Personal Commun. 120, 1–16 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Truong, L. Oudre, N. Vayatis, Selective review of offline change point detection methods. Signal Process. 167, 107299 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G.J.J. van den Burg, C.K.I. Williams, An evaluation of change point detection algorithms. arXiv, abs/2003.06222 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Kovács, H. Li, P. Bühlmann, A. Munk, Seeded binary segmentation: A general methodology for fast and optimal change point detection (2020). Preprint arXiv:2002.06633

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Killick, P. Fearnhead, I.A. Eckley, Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107(500), 1590–1598 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Yeung, J. Lai, J. Luo, Face off: Polarized public opinions on personal face mask usage during the covid-19 pandemic, in IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (2020), pp. 4802–4810

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Valdez, M. Ten Thij, K. Bathina, L.A. Rutter, J. Bollen, et al., Social media insights into us mental health during the covid-19 pandemic: longitudinal analysis of twitter data. J. Med. Int. Res. 22(12), e21418 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Hills, Machine in the Middle (MitM) BLE Attack (2020). https://www.blackhillsinfosec.com/machine-in-the-middle-mitm-ble-attack/

  28. A. Paviglianiti, V. Randazzo, S. Villata, et al. A Comparison of Deep Learning Techniques for Arterial Blood Pressure Prediction. Cognitive computation (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09910-0, DOI: https://10.1007/s12559-021-09910-0, (EPUB). https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12559-021-09910-0.pdf Open access paper.

  29. A. Khamparia, R.H. Mondal, P. Podder, B. Bhushan, V.H.C. de Albuquerque, S. Kumar, Computational Intelligence for Managing Pandemics, vol. 5. (Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, Berlin, 2021)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osman Salem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salem, O., Mehaoua, A. (2023). Ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman to Secure Data Exchange in Internet of Medical Things. In: Daimi, K., Alsadoon, A., Peoples, C., El Madhoun, N. (eds) Emerging Trends in Cybersecurity Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09640-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09640-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09639-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09640-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics