Skip to main content

Intervention Prediction in MOOCs Based on Learners’ Comments: A Temporal Multi-input Approach Using Deep Learning and Transformer Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13284))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1120 Accesses

Abstract

High learner dropout rates in MOOC-based education contexts have encouraged researchers to explore and propose different intervention models. In discussion forums, intervention is critical, not only to identify comments that require replies but also to consider learners who may require intervention in the form of staff support. There is a lack of research on the role of intervention based on learner comments to prevent learner dropout in MOOC-based settings. To fill this research gap, we propose an intervention model that detects when staff intervention is required to prevent learner dropout using a dataset from FutureLearn. Our proposed model was based on learners’ comments history by integrating the most-recent sequence of comments written by learners to identify if an intervention was necessary to prevent dropout. We aimed to find both the proper classifier and the number of comments representing the appropriate most recent sequence of comments. We developed several intervention models by utilising two forms of supervised multi-input machine learning (ML) classification models (deep learning and transformer). For the transformer model, specifically, we propose the siamese and dual temporal multi-input, which we term the multi-siamese BERT and multiple BERT. We further experimented with clustering learners based on their respective number of comments to analyse if grouping as a pre-processing step improved the results. The results show that, whilst multi-input for deep learning can be useful, a better overall effect is achieved by using the transformer model, which has better performance in detecting learners who require intervention. Contrary to our expectations, however, clustering before prediction can have negative consequences on prediction outcomes, especially in the underrepresented class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Soni, V.D.: Global impact of e-learning during COVID 19 (2020). SSRN 3630073

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aljarrah, A.A., Ababneh, M.A.-K., Cavus, N.: The role of massive open online courses during the COVID-19 era: challenges and perspective. New Trends Issues Proc. Human. Soc. Sci. 7(3), 142–152 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rivard, R.: Measuring the MOOC dropout rate. Inside High. Ed. 8, 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dang, A., Khanra, S., Kagzi, M.: Barriers towards the continued usage of massive open online courses: a case study in India. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 20(1), 100562 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cristea, A.I., et al.: Earliest predictor of dropout in MOOCs: a longitudinal study of FutureLearn courses. In: Association for Information Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dalipi, F., Imran, A.S., Kastrati, Z.: MOOC dropout prediction using machine learning techniques: review and research challenges. In: 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goopio, J., Cheung, C.: The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies. J. Teach. Travel Tour. 21(2), 177–197 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, S.X., et al.: Attention-based character-word hybrid neural networks with semantic and structural information for identifying of urgent posts in MOOC discussion forums. IEEE Access 7, 120522–120532 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alrajhi, L., Alharbi, K., Cristea, A.I.: A multidimensional deep learner model of urgent instructor intervention need in MOOC forum posts. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12149, pp. 226–236. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hone, K.S., El Said, G.R.: Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: a survey study. Comput. Educ. 98, 157–168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramesh, A., et al.: Understanding MOOC discussion forums using seeded LDA. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, X., et al.: Identification of urgent posts in MOOC discussion forums using an improved RCNN. In: 2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khodeir, N.A.: Bi-GRU urgent classification for MOOC discussion forums based on BERT. IEEE Access 9, 58243–58255 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wei, X., et al.: A convolution-LSTM-based deep neural network for cross-domain MOOC forum post classification. Information 8(3), 92 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Young, T., et al.: Recent trends in deep learning based natural language processing. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag, 13(3), 55–75 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitehill, J., et al.: Beyond prediction: first steps toward automatic intervention in MOOC student stopout (2015). SSRN 2611750

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cobos, R., Ruiz-Garcia, J.C.: Improving learner engagement in MOOCs using a learning intervention system: a research study in engineering education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 29(4), 733–749 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xing, W., Du, D.: Dropout prediction in MOOCs: using deep learning for personalized intervention. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 0735633118757015 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., Rangwala, H.: Needle in a haystack: identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 118, 1–9 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chaturvedi, S., Goldwasser, D., Daumé III, H.: Predicting instructor’s intervention in MOOC forums. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, vol. 1 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chandrasekaran, M.K., et al.: Learning instructor intervention from MOOC forums: early results and issues. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.07206 (2015)

  23. Kloft, M., et al.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Prenkaj, B., et al.: A survey of machine learning approaches for student dropout prediction in online courses. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 53(3), 1–34 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rose, C., Siemens, G.: Shared task on prediction of dropout over time in massively open online courses. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gitinabard, N., et al.: Your actions or your associates? Predicting certification and dropout in MOOCs with behavioral and social features. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00052 (2018)

  27. Crossley, S., et al.: Language to completion: success in an educational data mining massive open online class. Int. Educ. Data Min. Soc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crossley, S., et al.: Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chaplot, D.S., Rhim, E., Kim, J.: Predicting student attrition in MOOCs using sentiment analysis and neural networks. In: AIED Workshops (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mrhar, K., Douimi, O., Abik, M.: A dropout predictor system in MOOCs based on neural networks. J. Autom. Mob. Robot. Intell. Syst. 72–80 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wen, M., Yang, D., Rose, C.: Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: what does it tell us? In: Educational Data Mining 2014. Citeseer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. FutureLearn. https://www.futurelearn.com

  33. Alrajhi, L., Alamri, A., Pereira, F.D., Cristea, A.I.: Urgency analysis of learners’ comments: an automated intervention priority model for MOOC. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2021. LNCS, vol. 12677, pp. 148–160. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Alamri, A., Sun, Z., Cristea, A.I., Stewart, C., Pereira, F.D.: MOOC next week dropout prediction: weekly assessing time and learning patterns. In: Cristea, A.I., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2021. LNCS, vol. 12677, pp. 119–130. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80421-3_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. North, M.A.: A method for implementing a statistically significant number of data classes in the Jenks algorithm. In: 2009 Sixth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014)

  37. Elman, J.L.: Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14(2), 179–211 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gers, F.A., Schmidhuber, J., Cummins, F.: Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Comput. 12(10), 2451–2471 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Graves, A., Schmidhuber, J.: Framewise phoneme classification with bidirectional LSTM and other neural network architectures. Neural Netw. 18(5–6), 602–610 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Cho, K., et al.: Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014)

  41. Chung, J., et al.: Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555 (2014)

  42. Mikolov, T., Le, Q.V., Sutskever, I.: Exploiting similarities among languages for machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.4168 (2013)

  43. Otter, D.W., Medina, J.R., Kalita, J.K.: A survey of the usages of deep learning for natural language processing. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32(2), 604–624 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Devlin, J., et al.: Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laila Alrajhi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alrajhi, L., Alamri, A., Cristea, A.I. (2022). Intervention Prediction in MOOCs Based on Learners’ Comments: A Temporal Multi-input Approach Using Deep Learning and Transformer Models. In: Crossley, S., Popescu, E. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13284. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09680-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09680-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09679-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09680-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics