Skip to main content

Effect of Learning Styles on Learning Experience in Marketing Management Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gaming, Simulation and Innovations: Challenges and Opportunities (ISAGA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13219))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 451 Accesses

Abstract

The effect of the learning styles of management students on a learning experience in marketing management game was studied. The scales on learning experience and Kolb's learning styles inventory were administered on 120 students who played the game. The findings of the study revealed a significant effect of Concrete Experience (CE) and Abstract Conceptualization (AC) on the learning experience. The gender-wise significant difference was observed in the learning experience. Findings of the study revealed a significant interactive effect of gender and Reflective Observation style of learning on the learning experience in the marketing management game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The learning way: meta cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simul. Gaming 40(3), 297–327 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arthurs, J.B.: A juggling act in the classroom: managing different learning styles. Teach Learn Nur’s. 2(1), 2–7 and 3 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, T., et al.: Are learning style preferences of health science students predictive of their attitudes towards e-learning? AJET 25(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McHaney, R., White, D., Heilman, G.E.: Simulation project success and failure: Survey findings. Simul. Gaming 33(1), 49–66 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaidyanathan, R., Rochford, L.: An exploratory investigation of computer simulations, student preferences, and performance. Journal of Education for Business 73(February), 144–149 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fortmüller, R.: Learning through business games: acquiring competencies within virtual realities. Simul. Gaming 40(1), 68–83 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prouty, D.: Zip lines: the voice for adventure education. Creativity 40, 9–11 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, K.A., et al.: Relationships between games attributes and learning outcomes: review and research proposals. Simul. Gaming 40(2), 217–266 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mason, C.H., Perreault, Jr., W.D.: The Marketing Game! 3d ed. Irwin, Chicago (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., Gonçalves, D.: Improving Participation and Learning with Gamification. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications, pp. 10–17. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2013). https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583010

  12. Frontczak, N.T., Rivale, G.J.: An empirical investigation of learning styles in marketing education. In: McKinnon, G., Kelley, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Western Marketing Educators’ Association, pp. 93–100. Western Marketing Educators’ Association, San Diego, CA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chin, J., Dukes, R., Gamson, W.: Assessment in simulation and gaming: a review of the last 40 Years. Simul. Gaming 40(4), 553–568 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M.D., First, E.D., Hill, W.H., Krathwohl, D.R.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 1: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boyatzis, R.E., Kolb, D.A.: Assessing individuality in learning: the learning skills profile. Educ. Psychol. 11(3), 279–295 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Comer, L.B., Nicholls, J.A.F.: Simulation as an aid to learning: how does participation influence the process? Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises 23, 8–14 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hergert, M., Hergert, R.: “Factors affecting student perceptions of learning in a business policy game. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises 17, 92–96 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. White, C.S., Dale Von Riesen, R.: Computer MANAGEMENT SIMULATIONS AND SOME CORRELATES OF STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises 19, 225 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zalatan, K.A., Mayer, D.F.: Developing a learning culture: assessing changes in student performance and perception. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises 26, 45–51 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sitzmann, T.: A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Pers. Psychol. 64(2), 489–528 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jenson, J., Suzanne, C.: Gender, simulation, and gaming: research review and redirection. Simul. Gaming 41(1), 51–71 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, L.R.: A psychometric analysis of Kolb’s learning styles inventory. Exploring Experiential Learning: Simulations and Experiential Exercises 5, 193–198 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kolb, D.A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Washbush, J.B., Gosenpud, J.: Student Attitudes About Policy Course Simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises 18, 105–110 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaenzig, R., Hyatt, E.M., Anderson, S.: Gender differences in college of business educational experiences. J. Edu. Bus. 83(2), 95–100 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Slavin, R.: Enhancing Intergroup Relations in Schools: Cooperative Learning and Other Strategies. In: Hawley, W.D., Jackson, A.W. (eds.) Toward a Common Destiny: Improving Race and Ethnic Relations, pp. 291–314. Jossey Bass, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Loo, R.: A meta-analytic examination of Kolb’s learning style preferences among business majors. J. Edu. Bus. 77(5), 252–256 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Celenk, S., Karakis, O.: The usage level of general learning strategies of students attending different faculties “The AIBU example. AIBU, Egitim Faculty of Dergisi. 7(1), 26–46 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajeev K. Shukla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shukla, R.K., Sainy, M. (2022). Effect of Learning Styles on Learning Experience in Marketing Management Game. In: Dhar, U., Dubey, J., Dumblekar, V., Meijer, S., Lukosch, H. (eds) Gaming, Simulation and Innovations: Challenges and Opportunities. ISAGA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09959-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09959-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09958-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09959-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics