Skip to main content

A Framework for Hazard Identification of a Collaborative Plug&Produce System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Technologies and Applications (INTAP 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1616))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Plug&Produce systems accept reconfiguration and have the attribute of physical and logical flexibility. To implement the Plug&Produce system in a manufacturing plant, there is a need to assure that the system is safe. The process of risk assessment provides information that is used to implement the proper safety measures to ensure human and machine safety. An important step in the risk assessment process is hazard identification. Hazard identification of Plug&Produce system is unique as the hazard identification method provided in the safety standards do not consider system flexibility. In this paper, a framework for hazard identification of a collaborative Plug&Produce system is presented. A study case that includes a collaborative Plug&Produce system is presented and the framework is applied to identify the system’s hazards. Also, the generalisation of the framework application is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aitken, J.M., Alexander, R., Kelly, T.: A risk modelling approach for a communicating system of systems. In: 2011 IEEE International System Conference SysCon 2011 – Proceedings, pp. 442–447 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSCON.2011.5929099

  2. Arai, T., Aiyama, Y., Maeda, Y., Sugi, M., Ota, J.: Agile assembly system by ‘Plug and Produce.’ CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 49, 1–4 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62883-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bennulf, M., Danielsson, F., Svensson, B.: Identification of resources and parts in a Plug and Produce system using OPC UA. Procedia Manuf. 38, 858–865 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bennulf, M., Danielsson, F., Svensson, B., Lennartson, B.: Goal-oriented process plans in a multi-agent system for Plug & Produce. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2020.2994032

  5. Bi, Z.M., Lang, S.Y.T., Shen, W., Wang, L.: Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: the state of the art. Int. J. Prod. Res. 46, 967–992 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600905646

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gopinath, V., Johansen, K.: Risk assessment process for collaborative assembly - a job safety analysis approach. Procedia CIRP 44, 199–203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gopinath, V., Johansen, K., Gustafsson, Å., Axelsson, S.: Collaborative assembly on a continuously moving line - an automotive case study. Procedia Manuf. 17, 985–992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gopinath, V., Johansen, K., Ölvander, J.: Risk assessment for collaborative operation: a case study on hand-guided industrial robots. In: Risk Assess (2018). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.70607

  9. Gopinath, V., Ore, F., Grahn, S., Johansen, K.: Safety-focussed design of collaborative assembly station with large industrial robots. Procedia Manuf. 25, 503–510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.06.124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hanna, A., Bengtsson, K., Götvall, P.L., Ekström, M.: Towards safe human robot collaboration - risk assessment of intelligent automation. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, ETFA 2020-September, pp. 424–431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ETFA46521.2020.9212127

  11. Hull, T., Minarcin, M.A.: Considerations in collaborative robot system designs and safeguarding. SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf. 9, 545–551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koo, C.H., Schröck, S., Vorderer, M., Richter, J., Verl, A.: A model-based and software-assisted safety assessment concept for reconfigurable PnP-systems. Procedia CIRP 93, 359–364 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El Maraghy, H.A.: Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Flex. Serv. Manuf. J. 17, 261–276 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-006-9028-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E.G.G., Faccio, M., Rosati, G.: Human-robot collaboration in manufacturing applications: a review. Robotics 8, 1–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics8040100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Redmond, P.J., Michael, J.B., Shebalin, P.V.: Interface hazard analysis for system of systems. In: 2008 IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, SoSE 2008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSOSE.2008.4724202

  16. Schou, C., Madsen, O.: A plug and produce framework for industrial collaborative robots. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 14, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1729881417717472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. SIS (Swedish Standards Institute): Safety of machinery - general principles for design - Risk assessment and risk reduction (ISO 12100:2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. SIS (Swedish Standards Institute): Robots and robotic devices – Safety requirements for industrial robots – Part 1: Robots (ISO 10218‑1:2011) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. SIS (Swedish Standards Institute): Safety of machinery – Risk assessment – Part 2: Practical guidance and examples of methods (ISO 14121-2:2012, IDT) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. SIS (Swedish Standards Institute): Robots and robotic devices – Collaborative robots, (ISO/TS 15066:2016, IDT) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, C., Matthias, B., Kuhlenkötter, B.: Human ‐ robot collaboration – new applications in industrial robotics. In: International Conference on Competitive Manufacturing, pp. 293–299 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wojtynek, M., Steil, J.J., Wrede, S.: Plug, plan and produce as enabler for easy workcell setup and collaborative robot programming in smart factories. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 33(2), 151–161 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-019-00595-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is a part of the project named SafeAgain funded by the KK-stiftelsen foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bassam Massouh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Massouh, B., Ramasamy, S., Svensson, B., Danielsson, F. (2022). A Framework for Hazard Identification of a Collaborative Plug&Produce System. In: Sanfilippo, F., Granmo, OC., Yayilgan, S.Y., Bajwa, I.S. (eds) Intelligent Technologies and Applications. INTAP 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1616. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10525-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10525-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10524-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10525-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics