Abstract
5G Millimetre-wave (mmWave) utilizes frequencies ranging from 24 GHz to 100 GHz. There are various scheduling techniques in 5G mmWave, which work distinctly for different applications. Time-sensitive applications are very sensitive to the response time of resource allocation requests. We have compared the performance of various media access control (MAC) schedulers in scarce resources and the high demand of resources in the 5G mmWave network to find the optimal scheduler for the scenarios. We have used Netsim version 12.02 for the simulation.
We have created the simulation test-bed with user equipment (UEs) placed at different locations with different constant bit rate (CBR) applications in the 5G mmWave network and recorded the necessary observations. We have considered network metrics like throughput, delay, jitter, and a few other parameters to evaluate network performance. After analyzing data, we have found that max throughput is best suited for time-sensitive applications when UEs are placed near the next-generation base station (gNB). We arrived at this conclusion because throughput is approximately 33% and 6% higher than round-robin and Fair Scheduling algorithms. The delay of round-robin and Fair Scheduling is 192% and 231% higher than the max throughput. Also, jitter is almost 300% higher for the same. Similarly, The fair Scheduling algorithm is best suited for time-sensitive applications, placed far away from gNB, compared to round-robin, max throughput, and proportional fair Scheduling algorithms. Our findings will help service providers with limited resources and critical and time-sensitive applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad, A., Ahmad, S., Rehmani, M.H., Hassan, N.U.: A survey on radio resource allocation in cognitive radio sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 17(2), 888–917 (2015)
Akyildiz, I.F., Lee, W.Y., Vuran, M.C., Mohanty, S.: Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput. Netw. 50(13), 2127–2159 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2006.05.001
Roy, A., Pachuau, J.L., Saha, A.K.: An overview of queuing delay and various delay based algorithms in networks. Computing 103(10), 2361–2399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-00973-3
Castaneda, E., Silva, A., Gameiro, A., Kountouris, M.: An overview on resource allocation techniques for multi-user mimo systems. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19(1), 239–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2618870
Clerckx, B., Joudeh, H., Hao, C., Dai, M., Rassouli, B.: Rate splitting for mimo wireless networks: a promising phy-layer strategy for lte evolution. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54(5), 98–105 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2016.7470942
Firyaguna, F., Bonfante, A., Kibiłda, J., Marchetti, N.: Performance evaluation of scheduling in 5g-mmwave networks under human blockage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.13112 (2020)
Fodor, G., Rácz, A., Reider, N., Temesváry, A.: Architecture and protocol support for radio resource management (rrm). In: Long Term Evolution, pp. 113–168. Auerbach Publications (2016)
Héliot, F., Imran, M.A., Tafazolli, R.: Low-complexity energy-efficient resource allocation for the downlink of cellular systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. 61(6), 2271–2281 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2013.042313.120516
Hyytiä, E., Aalto, S.: On round-robin routing with fcfs and lcfs scheduling. Perf. Eval. 97, 83–103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2016.01.002
Jabeen, S., Haque, A.: An ici-aware scheduler for nb-iot devices in co-existence with 5g nr. In: 2021 IEEE 4th 5G World Forum (5GWF), pp. 236–240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/5GWF52925.2021.00048
Jang, J., Lee, K.B.: Transmit power adaptation for multiuser of dm systems. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 21(2), 171–178 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2002.807348
Mehaseb, M.A., Gadallah, Y., Elhamy, A., Elhennawy, H.: Classification of lte uplink scheduling techniques: an m2m perspective. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(2), 1310–1335 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2504182
Müller, C.F., Galaviz, G., Andrade, Á.G., Kaiser, I., Fengler, W.: Evaluation of scheduling algorithms for 5G mobile systems. In: Sanchez, M.A., Aguilar, L., Castañón-Puga, M., Rodríguez-Díaz, A. (eds.) Computer Science and Engineering—Theory and Applications. SSDC, vol. 143, pp. 213–233. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74060-7_12
Nilsson, P., Pióro, M.: Solving dimensioning tasks for proportionally fair networks carrying elastic traffic. Perf. Eval. 49(1–4), 371–386 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5316.02.00114-1
Olwal, T.O., Djouani, K., Kurien, A.M.: A survey of resource management toward 5G radio access networks. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 18(3), 1656–1686 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2016.2550765
Pedersen, K.I., Kolding, T.E., Frederiksen, F., Kovacs, I.Z., Laselva, D., Mogensen, P.E.: An overview of downlink radio resource management for utran long-term evolution. IEEE Commun. Mag. 47(7), 86–93 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2009.5183477
Perdana, D., Sanyoto, A.N., Bisono, Y.G.: Performance evaluation and comparison of scheduling algorithms on 5g networks using network simulator. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 14(4), 530–539 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2019.4.3570
Sesia, S., Toufik, I., Baker, M.: LTE-the UMTS Long Term Evolution: From Theory to Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2011)
Sudipta Majumder, B.S.: Analysis of performance vulnerability of mac scheduling algorithms due to syn flood attack in 5g nr mmwave. Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Explor. (2021). https://doi.org/10.19101/IJATEE.2021.874340
Suganya, S., Maheshwari, S., Latha, Y.S., Ramesh, C.: Resource scheduling algorithms for lte using weights. In: 2016 2nd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT), pp. 264–269. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICATCCT.2016.7912005
Taboada, I., Liberal, F., Fajardo, J.O., Blanco, B.: An index rule proposal for scheduling in mobile broadband networks with limited channel feedback. Perf. Eval. 117, 130–142 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2017.09.007
Wang, S., Xi, B., Zhang, Z., Deng, B.: A downlink scheduling algorithm based on network slicing for 5G. In: Gao, H., Fan, P., Wun, J., Xiaoping, X., Yu, J., Wang, Y. (eds.) ChinaCom 2020. LNICST, vol. 352, pp. 212–225. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67720-6_15
Wu, J., Wang, M., Chan, Y.C., Wong, E.W., Kim, T.: Performance evaluation of 5g mmwave networks with physical-layer and capacity-limited blocking. In: 2020 IEEE 21st International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/HPSR48589.2020.9098993
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Majumder, S., Biswas, A. (2022). Optimal MAC Scheduling Algorithm for Time-Sensitive Applications in Multi-UE Scenarios in 5G NR MmWave. In: Mukhopadhyay, S., Sarkar, S., Dutta, P., Mandal, J.K., Roy, S. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Communications and Business Analytics. CICBA 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1579. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10766-5_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10766-5_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10765-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10766-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)