Skip to main content

Consistency Regularization Helps Mitigate Robust Overfitting in Adversarial Training

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2022)

Abstract

Adversarial training (AT) has been shown to be one of the most effective ways to protect deep neural networks (DNNs) from adversarial attacks . However, the phenomenon of robust overfitting, that is, the robustness will drop sharply at a certain stage, always exists in the AT process. In order to obtain a robust model, it is important to reduce this robust generalization gap. In this paper, we delve into robust overfitting from a new perspective. We observe that consistency regularization, a popular technique in semi-supervised learning, has similar goals to AT and can help mitigate robust overfitting. We empirically verify this observation and find that most previous solutions are implicitly linked to consistency regularization. Inspired by this, we introduce a new AT solution that integrates consistency regularization and mean teacher (MT) strategy into AT. Specifically, we introduce a teacher model derived from the average weights of the student models in the training step. We then design a consistency loss function to make the predicted distribution of the student model on adversarial samples consistent with the predicted distribution of the teacher model on clean samples. Experiments show that our proposed method can effectively mitigate robust overfitting and improve the robustness of DNN models against common adversarial attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Athalye, A., Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security: circumventing defenses to adversarial examples. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 274–283. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.A.: Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2017, San Jose, CA, USA, 22–26 May 2017, pp. 39–57. IEEE Computer Society (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carmon, Y., Raghunathan, A., Schmidt, L., Liang, P., Duchi, J.C.: Unlabeled data improves adversarial robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13736 (2019)

  4. Chen, T., Zhang, Z., Liu, S., Chang, S., Wang, Z.: Robust overfitting may be mitigated by properly learned smoothening. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Croce, F., Hein, M.: Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks. In: ICML (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, Y., et al.: Exploring memorization in adversarial training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01606 (2021)

  7. Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572

  8. Goodfellow, I., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples, arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6572 (2014)

  9. Huang, L., Zhang, C., Zhang, H.: Self-adaptive training: beyond empirical risk minimization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laine, S., Aila, T.: Temporal ensembling for semi-supervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.02242 (2016)

  11. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06083 (2017)

  12. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Wu, X., Jha, S., Swami, A.: Distillation as a defense to adversarial perturbations against deep neural networks. In: 2016 IEEE symposium on security and privacy (SP), pp. 582–597. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Qiu, H., Dong, T., Zhang, T., Lu, J., Memmi, G., Qiu, M.: Adversarial attacks against network intrusion detection in IoT systems. IEEE Internet Things J. 8(13), 10327–10335 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiu, M., Qiu, H.: Review on image processing based adversarial example defenses in computer vision. In: 2020 IEEE 6th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, (HPSC) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS), pp. 94–99. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rice, L., Wong, E., Kolter, Z.: Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8093–8104. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szegedy, C.: Intriguing properties of neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199

  17. Tack, J., Yu, S., Jeong, J., Kim, M., Hwang, S.J., Shin, J.: Consistency regularization for adversarial robustness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.04623 (2021)

  18. Tarvainen, A., Valpola, H.: Mean teachers are better role models: Weight-averaged consistency targets improve semi-supervised deep learning results. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.01780 (2017)

  19. Tramer, F., Carlini, N., Brendel, W., Madry, A.: On adaptive attacks to adversarial example defenses. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08347 (2020)

  20. Wang, Y., Zou, D., Yi, J., Bailey, J., Ma, X., Gu, Q.: Improving adversarial robustness requires revisiting misclassified examples. In: ICLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Jiao, J., Xing, E., El Ghaoui, L., Jordan, M.: Theoretically principled trade-off between robustness and accuracy. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7472–7482. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, S., Gao, H., Rao, Q.: Defense against adversarial attacks by reconstructing images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 30, 6117–6129 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant 61972306 and in part by the Zhejiang Laboratory under Grant 2021KD0AB03.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haichang Gao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, S., Gao, H., Zhou, Y., Wu, Z., Tang, Y. (2022). Consistency Regularization Helps Mitigate Robust Overfitting in Adversarial Training. In: Memmi, G., Yang, B., Kong, L., Zhang, T., Qiu, M. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13370. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10989-8_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10989-8_58

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10988-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10989-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics