Skip to main content

Enterprise Modeling and Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Body of Knowledge for Modeling and Simulation

Abstract

Manufacturing and other industries are entering the digital age with all its challenges, from systems-of-systems constraints to interoperability challenges. This chapter of the SCS M&S Body of Knowledge discusses challenges that can be addressed by enterprise modeling and simulation. Such challenges include collaboration with partners, establishing supply chains, and enterprise optimization without becoming too brittle in an agile environment are.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mourad MH, Nassehi A, Schaefer D, Newman ST (2020) Assessment of interoperability in cloud manufacturing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 61(June 2019):101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101832

  2. Kozlenkova IV, Hult GTM, Lund DJ, Mena JA, Kekec P (2015) The role of marketing channels in supply chain management. J Retail 91(4):586–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Harland CM (1996) Supply chain management, purchasing and supply management, logistics, vertical integration, materials management and supply chain dynamics. Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Operations Management. UK: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: Proceedings—11th IEEE Symposium on object/component/service-oriented real-time distributed computing, ISORC 2008, pp 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2008.25

  5. Bouras A, Lagrange J-P, Rachuri S, Subrahmanian E (2007) ICT for supply chains and product lifecycle management: a research agenda for French-US collaboration. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu T, Guo X, Xu B, Zhao L, Peng Y, Yang H (2013) Next big thing in big data: the security of the ICT supply chain. In: Proceedings—SocialCom/PASSAT/BigData/EconCom/BioMedCom 2013, pp 1066–1073. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom.2013.172

  7. Lauras M, Truptil S, Charles A, Ouzrout Y, Lamothe J (2017) Interoperability and supply chain management. In Enterprise interoperability. Wiley, pp 131–150

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vernadat F (1996) Enterprise modeling and integration. In: Boom Koninklijke Uitgevers. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293x9700500211

  9. Laamanen MT (1994) IDEF standards. IFIP Trans a Comput Sci Technol, pp 121–130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doumeingts G (1985) How to decentralize decisions through GRAI model in production management. Comput Ind 6(6):501–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3615(85)90031-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Moigne J (1977) La théorie du système général. Théorie de La Modélisation, PUF

    Google Scholar 

  12. Melese J (1972) Component analysis of systems

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simon HA (1960) The new science of management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ https://doi.org/10.1037/13978-000

  14. Mesarovic MD, Macko D, Takahara Y (1970) Theory of hierarchical, multilevel, systems. Multilevel Syst, 34

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mintzberg H (1989) The structuring of organizations. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8

  16. Simon HA (1977) The organization of complex systems. In: Models of discovery. Springer, pp 245–261

    Google Scholar 

  17. David R (1997) Modeling of hybrid systems using continuous and hybrid Petri nets. In: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Petri Nets and performance models, pp 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pun L (1977) Approche méthodologique de modélisation en vue de la maîtrise assistée de la production. In: Congrès de l’AFCET Sur La Modélisation et La Maîtrise Des Systèmes Techniques Économiques et Sociaux, 2

    Google Scholar 

  19. Doumeingts G (1983) Methodology to design computer integrated manufacturing and control of manufacturing unit. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of McGill University Centre for Intelligent Machines, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp 194–265

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hill AV, Giard V, Mabert VA (1989) A decision support system for determining optimal retention stocks for service parts inventories. IIE Trans 21(3):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408178908966226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ESPRIT Consortium AMICE (1993) CIMOSA: open system architecture for CIM. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58064-2

  22. Mertins K, Jaekel F MO2GO: user oriented enterprise models for organisational and IT solutions. In Handbook on architectures of information systems, Springer, pp 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26661-5_27

  23. Scheer A-W (1994) Architecture of integrated information systems (ARIS). In: Business process engineering. Springer, pp 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bourey J-P, UJI RG, Doumeingts G, Berre AJ, Pantelopoulos S, Kalampoukas K (2006) Deliverable DTG2. 3 REPORT ON MODEL DRIVEN. Update 2:3–3

    Google Scholar 

  25. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lankhorst M, van Drunen H (2007) Enterprise architecture development and modelling–Combining TOGAF and ArchiMate. Via Nova Architectura, 21

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vicente M, Gama N, Mira da Silva M (2013) Using ArchiMate and TOGAF to understand the enterprise architecture and ITIL relationship. In: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38490-5_11

  28. Bell M (2008) Service-oriented modeling. Willey

    Google Scholar 

  29. Adamczyk BS, Szejka AL, Canciglieri O (2020) Knowledge-based expert system to support the semantic interoperability in smart manufacturing. Comput Ind 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103161

  30. IST (2008) Enterprise interoperability research roadmap (version 5.0) final. Cordis, European Comission

    Google Scholar 

  31. Andres B, Poler R (2020) An information management conceptual approach for the strategies alignment collaborative process. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12103959

  32. Coutinho C, Cretan A, da Silva CF, Ghodous P, Jardim-Goncalves R (2016) Service-based negotiation for advanced collaboration in enterprise networks. J Intell Manuf 27(1):201–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0857-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Afsarmanesh H, Camarinha-Matos L M (2009) On the classification and management of virtual organisation breeding environments. Int J Inf Technol Manag 8(3):234–259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2009.024604

  34. Vallespir B, Chen D, Ducq Y (2005) Enterprise modelling for interoperability. In: IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline), vol 16. https://doi.org/10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01530

  35. Bazoun H, Zacharewicz G, Ducq Y, Boyé H (2014) SLMToolBox: an implementation of MDSEA for servitisation and enterprise interoperability BT—Enterprise interoperability VI. In Mertins K, Bénaben F, Poler R, Bourrières J-P (eds) Enterprise interoperability VI; Speinger: Cham, Switzerland. Springer International Publishing, pp 101–111

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zacharewicz G, Diallo S, Ducq Y, Agostinho C, Jardim-Goncalves R, Bazoun H, Wang Z, Doumeingts G (2017) Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: state of the art and future challenges. Inf Syst E-Business Manag 15(2), 229–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0317-8

  37. Arsanjani A (2004) Service-oriented modeling and architecture. IBM Developer Works January, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zacharewicz G, Chen D, Vallespir B (2009) Short-lived ontology approach for agent/HLA federated enterprise interoperability. In: Proceedings—2009 International conference on interoperability for enterprise software and applications, IESA 2009, pp 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1109/I-ESA.2009.27

  39. Zacharewicz G, Frydman C, Giambiasi N (2008) G-DEVS/HLA environment for distributed simulations of workflows. SIMULATION 84(5):197–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549708092833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. TF2 model driven interoperability, engineering and simulation. INTEROP-VLab

    Google Scholar 

  41. ISO 27001: Risk management and compliance. 54 24 (2007) (testimony of Joel Brenner)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hunjan H (2018) ISO/SAE 21434 Automotive cyber-security engineering. Presentation, Renessas Electronics LTD.

    Google Scholar 

  43. ICT Supply Chain (n.d.) U.S. Department of Commerce

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hezam Haidar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Haidar, H., Daclin, N., Zacharewicz, G., Doumeingts, G. (2023). Enterprise Modeling and Simulation. In: Ören, T., Zeigler, B.P., Tolk, A. (eds) Body of Knowledge for Modeling and Simulation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11085-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11085-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11084-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11085-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics