Skip to main content

Measuring Inconsistency in Written Feedback: A Case Study in Politeness

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13355))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3828 Accesses

Abstract

Feedback, indisputably, has been widely recognized as one of the most important forms of communication between teachers and students and a significant lever to enhance learning experience and success. However, there is consistent evidence showing that higher education institutions struggle to deliver consistent, timely, and constructive feedback to students. This study aimed to investigate whether, and to what extent, feedback inconsistency manifested itself in terms of politeness displayed to students of different demographic attributes (i.e., gender and first-language background). To this end, a large-scale dataset consisting of longitudinal feedback given to 3,249 higher-education students in 35 courses were collected and analyzed by applying multi-level regression modeling. We demonstrated that there were significant differences between low-performing and high-performing students as well as between English-as-second-language and English-as-first-language students. However, the majority of variance measured in the politeness of feedback was explained by course-level and assessment-level characteristics, while student-level characteristics accounted for less than 1% variance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bandari, R., Asur, S., Huberman, B.: The pulse of news in social media: forecasting popularity. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 6 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boud, D., Molloy, E.: Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 38(6), 698–712 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, D.L., Winne, P.H.: Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 65(3), 245–281 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Canavan, C., Holtman, M.C., Richmond, M., Katsufrakis, P.J.: The quality of written comments on professional behaviors in a developmental multisource feedback program. Acad. Med. 85(10), S106–S109 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cavalcanti, A.P., et al.: How good is my feedback? A content analysis of written feedback. In: LAK, pp. 428–437 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cavalcanti, A.P., de Mello, R.F.L., Rolim, V., André, M., Freitas, F., Gaševic, D.: An analysis of the use of good feedback practices in online learning courses. In: ICALT, vol. 2161, pp. 153–157. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hattie, J., Timperley, H.: The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77(1), 81–112 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K.: Feedback on assessment: students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 33, 263–275 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Niu, T., Bansal, M.: Polite dialogue generation without parallel data. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 6, 373–389 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasbash, J., et al.: A User’s Guide to MLwiN, vol. 286. Institute of Education, London (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan, T., Henderson, M., Ryan, K., Kennedy, G.: Identifying the components of effective learner-centred feedback information. Teach. High. Educ., 1–18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smits, M.H., Boon, J., Sluijsmans, D.M., Van Gog, T.: Content and timing of feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on learning as a function of prior knowledge. Interact. Learn. Environ. 16(2), 183–193 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, M., Carless, D., Salter, D., Lam, J.: Giving and receiving feedback: a Hong Kong perspective (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guanliang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dai, W., Tsai, YS., Fan, Y., Gašević, D., Chen, G. (2022). Measuring Inconsistency in Written Feedback: A Case Study in Politeness. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_49

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics