Skip to main content

Identifying and Comparing Multi-dimensional Student Profiles Across Flipped Classrooms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2022)

Abstract

Flipped classroom (FC) courses, where students complete pre-class activities before attending interactive face-to-face sessions, are becoming increasingly popular. However, many students lack the skills, resources, or motivation to effectively engage in pre-class activities. Profiling students based on their pre-class behavior is therefore fundamental for teaching staff to make better-informed decisions on the course design and provide personalized feedback. Existing student profiling techniques have mainly focused on one specific aspect of learning behavior and have limited their analysis to one FC course. In this paper, we propose a multi-step clustering approach to model student profiles based on pre-class behavior in FC in a multi-dimensional manner, focusing on student effort, consistency, regularity, proactivity, control, and assessment. We first cluster students separately for each behavioral dimension. Then, we perform another level of clustering to obtain multi-dimensional profiles. Experiments on three different FC courses show that our approach can identify educationally-relevant profiles regardless of the course topic and structure. Moreover, we observe significant academic performance differences between the profiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Grades range from 1 to 6, with 6 being the best and 4 being the passing grade.

  2. 2.

    Correcting for multiple comparisons via a Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure.

  3. 3.

    Shapiro-Wilk test for FP: W = 0.97, \(p =\) 5.6e−05; and PC: W = 0.97, \(p =\) 3.1e−03. Kruskal-Wallis Test for FP: \({\chi }^2\)(4) = 21.8, \(p =\) 2.2e−04; PC: \({\chi }^2\)(3) = 13.4, \(p =\) 3.8e−03.

References

  1. Akpinar, N., Ramdas, A., Acar, U.: Analyzing student strategies in blended courses using clickstream data. In: Proceedings of the EDM, pp. 6–17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bassett, K., Olbricht, G.R., Shannon, K.B.: Student preclass preparation by both reading the textbook and watching videos online improves exam performance in a partially flipped course. CBE Life Sci. 19(3), ar32 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beatty, B.J., Merchant, Z., Albert, M.: Analysis of student use of video in a flipped classroom. TechTrends 63(4), 376–385 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biard, N., Cojean, S., Jamet, E.: Effects of segmentation and pacing on procedural learning by video. Comput. Hum. Behav. 89, 411–417 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boroujeni, M.S., Dillenbourg, P.: Discovery and temporal analysis of latent study patterns in MOOC interaction sequences. In: Proceedings of the LAK, pp. 206–215 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boroujeni, M.S., Sharma, K., Kidziński, Ł., Lucignano, L., Dillenbourg, P.: How to quantify student’s regularity? In: Proceedings of the EC-TEL, pp. 277–291 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Broadbent, J., Poon, W.L.: Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review. Internet High. Educ. 27, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, F., Cui, Y.: Utilizing student time series behaviour in learning management systems for early prediction of course performance. J. Learn. Anal. 7(2), 1–17 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho, M.H., Shen, D.: Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Educ. 34(3), 290–301 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corrin, L., de Barba, P.G., Bakharia, A.: Using learning analytics to explore help-seeking learner profiles in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the LAK, pp. 424–428 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geertshuis, S., Jung, M., Cooper-Thomas, H.: Preparing students for higher education: the role of proactivity. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 26(2), 157–169 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., Mirriahi, N.: Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. Internet High. Educ. 33, 74–85 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jovanovic, J., Mirriahi, N., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A.: Predictive power of regularity of pre-class activities in a flipped classroom. Comput. Educ. 134, 156–168 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Khalil, M., Ebner, M.: Clustering patterns of engagement in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs): the use of learning analytics to reveal student categories. J. Comput. High. Educ. 29(1), 114–132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9126-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lallé, S., Conati, C.: A data-driven student model to provide adaptive support during video watching across MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the AIED, pp. 282–295 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J., Choi, H.: Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 50, 934–945 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marras, M., Vignoud, J.T.T., Käser, T.: Can feature predictive power generalize? Benchmarking early predictors of student success across flipped and online courses. In: Proceedings of the EDM, pp. 150–160 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McBroom, J., Yacef, K., Koprinska, I.: DETECT: a hierarchical clustering algorithm for behavioural trends in temporal educational data. In: Proceedings of the AIED, pp. 374–385 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mojarad, S., Essa, A., Mojarad, S., Baker, R.S.: Data-driven learner profiling based on clustering student behaviors: learning consistency, pace and effort. In: Nkambou, R., Azevedo, R., Vassileva, J. (eds.) ITS 2018. LNCS, vol. 10858, pp. 130–139. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91464-0_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mubarak, A.A., Cao, H., Ahmed, S.A.: Predictive learning analytics using deep learning model in MOOCs’ courses videos. Educ. Inf. Technol. 26(1), 371–392 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I., Weiss, Y., et al.: On spectral clustering: analysis and an algorithm. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 2, 849–856 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High. Educ. 25, 85–95 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pardo, A., Gašević, D., Jovanovic, J., Dawson, S., Mirriahi, N.: Exploring student interactions with preparation activities in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(3), 333–346 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sher, V., Hatala, M., Gašević, D.: Analyzing the consistency in within-activity learning patterns in blended learning. In: Proceedings of the LAK, pp. 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sletten, S.R.: Investigating flipped learning: student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 26(3), 347–358 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vermunt, J.D., Donche, V.: A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: state of the art and moving forward. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 29(2), 269–299 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wan, H., Liu, K., Yu, Q., Gao, X.: Pedagogical intervention practices: improving learning engagement based on early prediction. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(2), 278–289 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Mejia-Domenzain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mejia-Domenzain, P., Marras, M., Giang, C., Käser, T. (2022). Identifying and Comparing Multi-dimensional Student Profiles Across Flipped Classrooms. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics