Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13356))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3561 Accesses

Abstract

This study aims to examine massive open online course (MOOC) students’ experiences with a natural language processing-based Q&A chatbot. Following the definition of ‘inclusive learning’ in MOOCs from the Universal Design of Learning approach, this study firstly compares students’ behavioral intentions before and after using the chatbot. Next, this study investigates students’ levels of several other learning experience domains after using the chatbot—teaching presence, cognitive presence, social presence, enjoyment, perceived use of ease, etc. After examining students’ possible disparate learning experiences in these domains, this study investigates how age, gender, region, and native language factors influence students’ learning experiences with the chatbot. Lastly, but most importantly, this study explores how demographic factors influence students’ perception of chatbot interactions. If any are found, this study will focus on possible negative demographic factors that affect only certain groups of students to further examine how to improve a Q&A chatbot for inclusive learning in MOOCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bouchet, F., Labarthe, H., Bachelet, R., Yacef, K.: Who wants to chat on a MOOC? Lessons from a peer recommender system. In: Delgado Kloos, C., Jermann, P., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Seaton, D.T., White, S. (eds.) Digital education: out to the world an back to the campus, pp. 150–159. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Coughlan, T., Lister, K., Seale, J., Scanlon, E., Weller, M.: Accessible inclusive learning: foundations. In: Ferguson, R., Jones, A., Scanlon, E. (eds.) Educational Visions: Lessons from 40 Years of Innovation, pp. 51–73. Ubiquity Press, London (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 319–340 (1989). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garrison, D.R.: E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V., Joksimovic, S., Siemens, G.: Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC research initiative. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1954

  6. Han, S., Lee, M.K.: FAQ chatbot and inclusive learning in massive open online courses. Comput. Educ. 179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104395.Article no. 104395

  7. Han, S., Liu, M., Pan, Z., Cai, Y., Shao, P.: Making FAQ chatbots more Inclusive: an examination of non-native English users’ interactions with new technology in massive open online courses. Revision Submitted (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Julia, K., Peter, V.R., Marco, K.: Educational scalability in MOOCs: analysing instructional designs to find best practices. Comput. Educ. 161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104054. Article no. 104054

  9. Kovanović, V., et al.: Exploring communities of inquiry in massive open online courses. Comput. Educ. 119, 44–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, M., Zou, W., Shi, Y., Pan, Z., Li, C.: What do participants think of today’s MOOCs: an updated look at the benefits and challenges of MOOCs designed for working professionals. J. Comput. High. Educ. 32(2), 307–329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09234-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y., Thorimbert, L.M.: Artificially intelligent conversational agents in libraries. Libr. Hi Tech 28, 496–522 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011096196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shawar, B.A., Atwell, E.S.: Chatbots: are they really useful? J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguist. 22, 29–49 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wambsganss, T., Winkler, R., Söllner, M., Leimeister, J.M.: A conversational agent to improve response quality in course evaluations. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu HI USA, pp. 1–9. ACM (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Songhee Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A

Tentative student’ learning experience domains with the chatbot.

figure a

Appendix B

All interviews will be structured as open-ended conversations about their lived learning experiences with the chatbot. I will let participant responses shape the following questions asked during the interviews. Some examples of questions and prompts that I will use are as follows:

  1. 1.

    What was your experience like to use the chatbot?

  2. 2.

    Can you walk me through some of your thoughts about the chatbot’s responses that you just received?

  3. 3.

    Can you tell me more about what you said when you described […]?

  4. 4.

    What thoughts are standing out to you as you see the [erroneous] response here?

  5. 5.

    Earlier you mentioned that you were experiencing […] Are you noticing the same thing here?

  6. 6.

    Some people describe […] as they see this kind of response. Are you noticing something similar? Different? In what way?

  7. 7.

    Can you tell me more about this response that you received here? Do you find that it helps you or interferes with what you’re seeking?

  8. 8.

    Can you describe any feelings that were generated as you used the chatbot?

  9. 9.

    Did you notice that the chatbot cannot respond to this kind of question? Do you think there should be a response to this kind of question?

  10. 10.

    I am going to observe you while you use the chatbot in this session. During the observation, I noticed […]; did you realize that you were doing […]? Can you help me to understand more about […]?

  11. 11.

    Is there anything that you’d like to share about your experiences with the chatbot?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Han, S., Liu, M. (2022). Developing an Inclusive Q&A Chatbot in Massive Open Online Courses. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Posters and Late Breaking Results, Workshops and Tutorials, Industry and Innovation Tracks, Practitioners’ and Doctoral Consortium. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13356. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11646-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11647-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics