Abstract
Digital transformation initiatives must meet specific demands, mainly to improve existing processes or provide a more efficient way to address a problem or situation. When such interventions are required for large projects in the public sector, the involvement of multiple stakeholder groups becomes inevitable. The literature indicates that this often leads to complex stakeholder interrelations and conflicting interests because of diverse perspectives and power dynamics. This paper presents the case of a machine-readable passport project whose purpose was to automate the passport transaction process in Bangladesh; that involved multiple organisations with diverse portfolios from the public and private sectors. Although considerable success was achieved, it was not without challenges because of the complex power dynamics and the sociocultural and political environments of the various stakeholder groups involved. Using the salience model, this study examined stakeholder relations, interests, and power plays and provides rich insight into the complexities and challenges of the stakeholder relationships. Data were collected from a series of interviews, focus group discussion, and observations of participants during the early stage of the project. The findings suggest that information and communications technology innovation, implementation, and organisational change in developing countries is deeply rooted in sociocultural and organisational norms, vested interests, and power politics at multiple levels. In addition to contributing to new knowledge in digital transformation interventions in developing countries, the study has policy implications and practical lessons for designers and implementers working in developing countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)
Huong, F.T.N.: Stakeholder salience and strategy in event tourism (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/17396
Joos, H.C., zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D., Pidun, U.: Project stakeholder management as the integration of stakeholder salience, public participation, and nonmarket strategies. Schmalenbach Bus. Rev. 72(3), 447–477 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41464-020-00092-0
Mukherjee, S.: How stakeholder engagement affects IT projects. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Eng. Technol. 8, 3516–3518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3415959
Todorow, L.: Understanding multi-stakeholder dialogues: the emerging concept of community of practice within a case study involving the UN Global Compact and the UN Principles for Responsible Investment. Bus. Peace Sustain. Dev. 2016, 8–31 (2017)
Ayala-Orozco, B., et al.: Challenges and strategies in place-based multi-stakeholder collaboration for sustainability: learning from experiences in the Global South. Sustain. 10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093217
San Cristóbal, J.R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J.A., Iglesias, G.: Complexity and project management: a general overview. Complexity 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4891286
Pade-Khene, C., et al.: Complexity of stakeholder interaction in applied research. Ecol. Soc. 18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05405-180213
Metar, U.: Stakeholder engagement in mega projects. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/stakeholder-engagement-mega-projects-umesh-metar-pmp-pmi-rmp/?trk=public_profile_article_view. Accessed 30 Oct 2021
Heravi, A., Coffey, V., Trigunarsyah, B.: Evaluating the level of stakeholder involvement during the project planning processes of building projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33, 985–997 (2015)
Kowalska, O., Haniff, A.P.: Stakeholder complexity and the impact on the perceptions of project success. In: 25th International EurOMA Conference, pp. 1–10 (2018)
Ovi, I.H.: Bureaucratic lethargy making doing business difficult. https://www.dhakatribune.com/business/economy/2020/12/18/bureaucratic-lethargy-making-doing-business-difficult. Accessed 8 Dec 2021
Adnan, T.M.: Stakeholder management in complex projects: an empirical case study (2018). http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfioulu-201808312685.pdf
Chigona, W., Roode, D., Nazeer, N., Pinnock, B.: Investigating the impact of stakeholder management on the implementation of a public access project: the case of Smart Cape. South African J. Bus. Manag. 41, 39–50 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v41i2.517
Spangenberg, J.H., et al.: Doing what with whom? Stakeholder analysis in a large transdisciplinary research project in South-East Asia. Paddy Water Environ. 16(2), 321–337 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0634-2
Ginige, K., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R.: Mapping stakeholders associated with societal challenges: a methodological framework. Procedia Eng. 212 (2018)
Van Niekerk, M.: The applicability and usefulness of the stakeholder strategy matrix for festival management. Event Manag. 20, 165–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3727/152599516X14610017108666
Nguyen, T.S., Mohamed, S., Panuwatwanich, K.: Stakeholder management in complex project: review of contemporary literature. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 8, 75–89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.32738/jeppm.201807.0003
Allen, W., Kilvington, M.: Stakeholder analysis. In: Frame, B., Gordon, R., Mortimer, C. (eds.) Hatched: The Capacity for Sustainable Development, pp. 249–253 (2010)
Bryson, J.M., Patton, M.Q., Bowman, R.A.: Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval. Program Plann. 34, 1–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001
Puranik, S., Bremdal, B.A.: Smart system of renewable energy storage based on INtegrated EVs and bAtteries to empower mobile, Distributed and centralised Energy storage in the distribution grid (2017)
Slabá, M.: Stakeholder power-interest matrix and stakeholder-responsibility matrix in corporate social responsibility. In: The 8th International Days of Statistics and Economics, pp. 1366–1374 (2014)
Kapiriri, L., Donya Razavi, S.: Salient stakeholders: using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders’ influence in healthcare priority setting. Heal. Policy OPEN. 2, 100048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048
Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E.: The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence, and implications. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 65–91 (1995)
Ilinova, A., Cherepovitsyn, A., Evseeva, O.: Stakeholder management: an approach in CCS projects. Resources 7, 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7040083
Powell, P., Walsh, A.: Whose curriculum is it anyway? Stakeholder salience in the context of degree apprenticeships. High. Educ. Q. 72, 90–106 (2018)
Ortega, C.P., Hernandez, M.J., MartÃ, E.G., Vallejo-Martos, M.: The stakeholder salience model revisited: evidence from Agri-Food cooperatives in Spain. Sustainability 11, 1–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030574
Jonsson, N., Yacobucci, I.: A more sustainable society through stakeholder salience: furthering stakeholder theory by exploring identification and prioritization processes with a focus on intraorganizational perceptions in an SME (2019)
Thapa, D., Sæbø, Ø.: How to scale ICT4D projects: a salience stakeholder perspective. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries, Ocho Rios, Jamaica, pp. 741–752 (2012)
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J.: Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manag. Rev. 22, 853–886 (1997). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67–93 (1999)
Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 320–330 (2006)
Varga-Atkins, T., Bunyan, N., McIsaac, J., Fewtrell, J.: The nominal group technique: a practical guide for facilitators (2011)
Søndergaard, E., Ertmann, R.K., Reventlow, S., Lykke, K.: Using a modified nominal group technique to develop general practice. BMC Fam. Pract. 19, 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0811-9
Park, H.S., Lee, Y.H.: Exploring a process model for stakeholder management. Public Relat. J. 9, 1–17 (2015)
Şener, İ, Varoğlu, A., Karapolatgil, A.A.: Sustainability reports disclosures: who are the most salient stakeholders? Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 235, 84–92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.028
De’, R.: E-government systems in developing countries: stakeholders and conflict. In: Wimmer, M.A., Traunmüller, R., Grönlund, Å., Andersen, K.V. (eds.) EGOV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3591, pp. 26–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11545156_3
Hussain, B., Imran, A., Turner, T.: Key challenges for establishing CIO position in the public sector of LDCs: a case of Bangladesh. Paper presented at the 27th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wollongong, 5–7 December 2016
Imran, A., Gregor, S.: Uncovering the hidden issues in e-government adoption in a least developed country: the case of Bangladesh. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 18, 30–56 (2010)
Axelsson, K., Melin, U., Lindgren, I.: Stakeholder salience changes in an e-government implementation project. In: Wimmer, M.A., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) International Federation for Information Processing, pp. 237–249 (2013)
Neville, B.A., Bell, S.J., Whitwell, G.J.: Stakeholder salience revisited: refining, redefining, and refueling an underdeveloped conceptual tool. J. Bus. Ethics. 102, 357–378 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0818-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Imran, A., Okai-Ugbaje, S. (2022). Complexities and Challenges of Multi-stakeholder Involvement in Digital Transformation in the Global South: The Machine-Readable Passport Project in Bangladesh. In: Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Makori, E.O., Robles-Flores, J.A., Bitso, C. (eds) Innovation Practices for Digital Transformation in the Global South. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 645. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12824-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12825-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)