Skip to main content

On the Power of Recursive Word-Functions Without Concatenation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems (DCFS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13439))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

Primitive recursion can be defined on words instead of natural numbers. Up to usual encoding, primitive recursive functions coincide. Working with words allows to address words directly and not through some integer encoding (of exponential size). Considering alphabets with at least two symbols allows to relate simply and naturally to complexity theory. Indeed, the polynomial-time complexity class (as well as NP and exponential time) corresponds to delayed and dynamical evaluation with a polynomial bound on the size of the trace of the computation as a direct acyclic graph.

Primitive recursion in the absence of concatenation (or successor for numbers) is investigated. Since only suffixes of an input can be output, computation is very limited; e.g. pairing and unary encoding are impossible. Yet non-trivial relations and languages can be decided. Some algebraic (\(\texttt {a}^n\texttt {b}^n\), palindromes) and non-algebraic (\(\texttt {a}^n\texttt {b}^n\texttt {c}^n\)) languages are decidable. It is also possible to check arithmetical constrains like \(\texttt {a}^n\texttt {b}^m\texttt {c}^{P(n,m)}\) with P polynomial with positive coefficients in two (or more) variables. Every regular language is decidable if recursion can be defined on multiple functions at once.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We restrain from coining the primitive induction term to avoid any misunderstanding with close fields of research.

  2. 2.

    The usual definition is on the reversed word, but we define it in coherence with the restriction to left concatenation.

References

  1. Asser, G.: Primitive recursive word-functions of one variable. In: Börger, E. (ed.) Computation Theory and Logic. LNCS, vol. 270, pp. 14–19. Springer, Heidelberg (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-18170-9_150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellantoni, S.J., Cook, S.A.: A new recursion-theoretic characterization of the polytime functions. Comput. Complex. 2, 97–110 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201998

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Calude, C., Sântean, L.: On a theorem of günter asser. Math. Log. Q. 36(2), 143–147 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobham, A.: The intrinsic computational difficulty of functions. In: Bar-Hillel, Y. (ed.) Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. In: Proceedings of the 1964 International Congress, North-Holland, pp. 24–30 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, S.A., Kapron, B.M.: A survey of classes of primitive recursive functions. Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex. 1 (2017). https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2017/001

  6. von Henke, F.W., Rose, G., Indermark, K., Weihrauch, K.: On primitive recursive wordfunctions. Computing 15(3), 217–234 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242369

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Khachatryan, M.H.: On generalized primitive recursive string functions. Math. Probl. Comput. Sci. 43, 42–46 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matiyasevich, Y.: Hilbert’s tenth problem and paradigms of computation. In: Cooper, S.B., Löwe, B., Torenvliet, L. (eds.) CiE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3526, pp. 310–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11494645_39

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Santean, L.: A hierarchy of unary primitive recursive string-functions. In: Dassow, J., Kelemen, J. (eds.) IMYCS 1990. LNCS, vol. 464, pp. 225–233. Springer, Heidelberg (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-53414-8_45

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Soare, R.I.: Computability and incomputability. In: Cooper, S.B., Löwe, B., Sorbi, A. (eds.) CiE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4497, pp. 705–715. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73001-9_75

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Vučkovi, V.: Recursive word-functions over infinite alphabets. Math. Log. Q. 13(2), 123–138 (1970)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérôme Durand-Lose .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Durand-Lose, J. (2022). On the Power of Recursive Word-Functions Without Concatenation. In: Han, YS., Vaszil, G. (eds) Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems. DCFS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13439. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13257-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13257-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13256-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13257-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics