Abstract
Driven by different trends, such as digitalization, the number of companies aiming for successful business transformation is increasing, while new structures and systems are paving the way. Strategic agile management systems offer significant potential benefits given the increasing speed of the evolving environment in which organizations find themselves these days. To select and implement the appropriate strategic agile management system, companies need to understand the underlying theoretical principles to be able to select the most suitable for the respective company and to introduce it based on individual adaption. Within this paper, a morphology is presented to improve theoretical knowledge about strategic agile management systems. Creating a common understanding of strategic agile management systems and their current areas of application creates a suitable frame of reference for future research projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buchholz, U., Knorre, S.: Interne Kommunikation in agilen Unternehmen. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2017)
Valenduc, G., Vendramin, P.: Digitalisation, between disruption and evolution. Trans. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 23, 121–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701379
Almeida, F., Duarte Santos, J., Augusto Monteiro, J.: The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 world. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 48, 97–103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206
Pries-Heje, J., Krohn, M.M.: The SAFe way to the agile organization. In: Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Article 18. Association for Computing Machinery, Cologne, Germany (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3120459.3120478
Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., Antunes Marante, C.: A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Manag. Stud. 58, 1159–1197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639
Japing, T.A.: Steuerungsmechanismen Agiler Prozesse (2018)
Bendel, O.: Was ist “Agilität”? (2019). https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/agilitaet-99882/version-368852
Habermann, F.: Hybrides Projektmanagement — agile und klassische Vorgehensmodelle im Zusammenspiel. HMD 50, 93–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340857
Petersen, S.: Führung in Managementsystemen. Der Faktor Mensch in der ISO 9001, ISO 14001 und OHSAS 18001. Hanser, München (2015)
Senge, P.: The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning Organizationsenge. Hum. Resour. Manage. 29, 343 (1990)
Arnold, R.D., Wade, J.P.: A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 44, 669–678 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050
Kreikebaum, H., Gilbert, D.U., Behnam, M.: Strategisches Management. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart (2018)
Drucker, P.F.: The Practice of Management. Harper & Row (1954)
Kudernatsch, D.: Balanced scorecard als steuerungsinstrument — Direkt Anlage Bank. In: Engelbach, W., Meier, R. (eds.) Customer Care Management. Lernen von den Besten aus den USA und Deutschland. Springer eBook Collection Business and Economics, pp. 161–176. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88933-1_8
Niven, P.R., Lamonte, B.: Objectives and key results. In: Driving Focus, Alignment, and Engagement with OKRs. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)
Benioff, M.R., Adler, C.: Behind the cloud. In: The Untold Story of How Salesforce.com Went from Idea to Billion-Dollar Company--and Revolutionized an Industry. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2010)
Lafley, A.G., Martin, R.L.: Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works. Harvard Business Press (2013)
Bickelmann, R.: Key Account Management. Gabler Verlag (2001)
Klesse, P.: Best Practice im Vertrieb Durch Hoshin Kanri. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2019)
McChesney, C., Covey, S., Huling, J.: The 4 disciplines of execution. In: Make Your Most Wildly Important Goals Happen. Free Press, New York (2012)
vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of Rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, vol. 1, pp. 2206–2217 (2017)
Rowley, J., Slack, F.: Conducting a literature review. Manag. Res. News 27, 31–39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26 (2002)
Cross, S.E.: A model to guide organizational adaptation. In: 2013 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference, pp. 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352653
Nicoletti, B.: Agile procurement. In: Agile Procurement, pp. 15–42. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61082-5_3
Zykov, S.V.: The agile way. In: Managing Software Crisis: A Smart Way to Enterprise Agility. SIST, vol. 92, pp. 1–33. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77917-1_1
Kuhn, M., Dölle, C., Riesener, M., Schuh, G.: Concept for Organizational Structures of Agile Development Networks Production at the Leading Edge of Technology, pp. 653–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60417-5_65
Wang, Q., Ren, C., Chen, F.: Achieve agile enterprise system through collaboration with BPMS. In: 2012 Annual SRII Global Conference, pp. 494–501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/SRII.2012.61
Hannay, J.E., Brathen, K., Mevassvik, O.M.: Agile requirements handling in a service-oriented taxonomy of capabilities. Requir. Eng. 22(2), 289–314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0244-8
Ritchey, T.: Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 792–801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602177
Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26
Andrews, K.R.: The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1971)
Doerr, J.E.: Measure what matters. In: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs. Portfolio/Penguin, New York (2018)
Ignatius, A.: Time to kill forced rankings? Harv. Bus. Rev. 93, 1 (2015)
Luft, J., Shields, M.D.: Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Acc. Organ. Soc. 28, 169–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00026-0
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Balanced scorecard. In: Strategie Erfolgreich Umsetzten. Schäffler-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart (1997)
Ematinger, R., Schulze, S.: Spielend Ziele setzen und erreichen. Objectives and Key Results mit LEGO SERIOUS PLAY. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2020)
Gary, M.S., Yang, M.M., Yetton, P.W., Sterman, J.D.: Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organ. Sci. 28, 395–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1131
Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 705–717 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705
Wright, P.M., Kacmar, K.M.: Goal specificity as a determinant of goal commitment and goal change. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 59, 242–260 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1059
Janeš, A., Faganel, A.: Instruments and methods for the integration of company’s strategic goals and key performance indicators. Kybernetes 42, 928–942 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2012-0022
Acknowledgments
This research is a part of the findings of the research project “OKReady”. The IGF project 21740 N of the Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Foundation FIR e. V. at RWTH Aachen University, Campus-Boulevard 55, 52074 Aachen, is funded by the AiF within the scope of the program for the promotion of industrial joint research (IGF) by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) based on a decision of the German Bundestag. Responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. On behalf of the authors, we would like to thank the AiF for the support within the scope of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Herkenrath, C., Conrad, R., Stich, V. (2022). Becoming an Agile Organization: Development of a Morphology for Strategic Agile Management Systems. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ortiz, A., Boucher, X., Osório, A.L. (eds) Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0. PRO-VE 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 662. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14843-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14844-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)