Skip to main content

Becoming an Agile Organization: Development of a Morphology for Strategic Agile Management Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0 (PRO-VE 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 662))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1258 Accesses

Abstract

Driven by different trends, such as digitalization, the number of companies aiming for successful business transformation is increasing, while new structures and systems are paving the way. Strategic agile management systems offer significant potential benefits given the increasing speed of the evolving environment in which organizations find themselves these days. To select and implement the appropriate strategic agile management system, companies need to understand the underlying theoretical principles to be able to select the most suitable for the respective company and to introduce it based on individual adaption. Within this paper, a morphology is presented to improve theoretical knowledge about strategic agile management systems. Creating a common understanding of strategic agile management systems and their current areas of application creates a suitable frame of reference for future research projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Buchholz, U., Knorre, S.: Interne Kommunikation in agilen Unternehmen. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Valenduc, G., Vendramin, P.: Digitalisation, between disruption and evolution. Trans. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 23, 121–134 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258917701379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida, F., Duarte Santos, J., Augusto Monteiro, J.: The challenges and opportunities in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 world. IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev. 48, 97–103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pries-Heje, J., Krohn, M.M.: The SAFe way to the agile organization. In: Proceedings of the XP2017 Scientific Workshops, Article 18. Association for Computing Machinery, Cologne, Germany (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3120459.3120478

  5. Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., Antunes Marante, C.: A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J. Manag. Stud. 58, 1159–1197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Japing, T.A.: Steuerungsmechanismen Agiler Prozesse (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bendel, O.: Was ist “Agilität”? (2019). https://wirtschaftslexikon.gabler.de/definition/agilitaet-99882/version-368852

  8. Habermann, F.: Hybrides Projektmanagement — agile und klassische Vorgehensmodelle im Zusammenspiel. HMD 50, 93–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen, S.: Führung in Managementsystemen. Der Faktor Mensch in der ISO 9001, ISO 14001 und OHSAS 18001. Hanser, München (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Senge, P.: The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning Organizationsenge. Hum. Resour. Manage. 29, 343 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Arnold, R.D., Wade, J.P.: A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Proc. Comput. Sci. 44, 669–678 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreikebaum, H., Gilbert, D.U., Behnam, M.: Strategisches Management. Kohlhammer Verlag, Stuttgart (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Drucker, P.F.: The Practice of Management. Harper & Row (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kudernatsch, D.: Balanced scorecard als steuerungsinstrument — Direkt Anlage Bank. In: Engelbach, W., Meier, R. (eds.) Customer Care Management. Lernen von den Besten aus den USA und Deutschland. Springer eBook Collection Business and Economics, pp. 161–176. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88933-1_8

  15. Niven, P.R., Lamonte, B.: Objectives and key results. In: Driving Focus, Alignment, and Engagement with OKRs. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Benioff, M.R., Adler, C.: Behind the cloud. In: The Untold Story of How Salesforce.com Went from Idea to Billion-Dollar Company--and Revolutionized an Industry. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lafley, A.G., Martin, R.L.: Playing to Win: How Strategy Really Works. Harvard Business Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bickelmann, R.: Key Account Management. Gabler Verlag (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klesse, P.: Best Practice im Vertrieb Durch Hoshin Kanri. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. McChesney, C., Covey, S., Huling, J.: The 4 disciplines of execution. In: Make Your Most Wildly Important Goals Happen. Free Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., Cleven, A.: Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of Rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, vol. 1, pp. 2206–2217 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rowley, J., Slack, F.: Conducting a literature review. Manag. Res. News 27, 31–39 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cross, S.E.: A model to guide organizational adaptation. In: 2013 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE) & IEEE International Technology Management Conference, pp. 1–11 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITMC.2013.7352653

  25. Nicoletti, B.: Agile procurement. In: Agile Procurement, pp. 15–42. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61082-5_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Zykov, S.V.: The agile way. In: Managing Software Crisis: A Smart Way to Enterprise Agility. SIST, vol. 92, pp. 1–33. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77917-1_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuhn, M., Dölle, C., Riesener, M., Schuh, G.: Concept for Organizational Structures of Agile Development Networks Production at the Leading Edge of Technology, pp. 653–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60417-5_65

  28. Wang, Q., Ren, C., Chen, F.: Achieve agile enterprise system through collaboration with BPMS. In: 2012 Annual SRII Global Conference, pp. 494–501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/SRII.2012.61

  29. Hannay, J.E., Brathen, K., Mevassvik, O.M.: Agile requirements handling in a service-oriented taxonomy of capabilities. Requir. Eng. 22(2), 289–314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-016-0244-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ritchey, T.: Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 792–801 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22, 336–359 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Andrews, K.R.: The Concept of Corporate Strategy. Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Doerr, J.E.: Measure what matters. In: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World with OKRs. Portfolio/Penguin, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ignatius, A.: Time to kill forced rankings? Harv. Bus. Rev. 93, 1 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Luft, J., Shields, M.D.: Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Acc. Organ. Soc. 28, 169–249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00026-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Balanced scorecard. In: Strategie Erfolgreich Umsetzten. Schäffler-Poeschel Verlag, Stuttgart (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ematinger, R., Schulze, S.: Spielend Ziele setzen und erreichen. Objectives and Key Results mit LEGO SERIOUS PLAY. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden; Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gary, M.S., Yang, M.M., Yetton, P.W., Sterman, J.D.: Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organ. Sci. 28, 395–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P.: Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey. Am. Psychol. 57, 705–717 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wright, P.M., Kacmar, K.M.: Goal specificity as a determinant of goal commitment and goal change. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 59, 242–260 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Janeš, A., Faganel, A.: Instruments and methods for the integration of company’s strategic goals and key performance indicators. Kybernetes 42, 928–942 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2012-0022

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is a part of the findings of the research project “OKReady”. The IGF project 21740 N of the Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Foundation FIR e. V. at RWTH Aachen University, Campus-Boulevard 55, 52074 Aachen, is funded by the AiF within the scope of the program for the promotion of industrial joint research (IGF) by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) based on a decision of the German Bundestag. Responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. On behalf of the authors, we would like to thank the AiF for the support within the scope of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Clara Herkenrath , Ruben Conrad or Volker Stich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Herkenrath, C., Conrad, R., Stich, V. (2022). Becoming an Agile Organization: Development of a Morphology for Strategic Agile Management Systems. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ortiz, A., Boucher, X., Osório, A.L. (eds) Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0. PRO-VE 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 662. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14844-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics