Skip to main content

Responsible Research and Innovation Through Gender-Responsive Collaborative Virtual Hubs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0 (PRO-VE 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 662))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1500 Accesses

Abstract

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) through science and technology has a great potential to transform the future and advance society in social, environmental, economic, ethical, and legal aspects. Advancing RRI keys, like gender-responsiveness and gender equality, science literacy and science education, public engagement, open access, ethics, governance, is essential for its development. The present exploratory research paper aims to investigate the role of Collaborative Networks (CN) and gender-responsive collaborative virtual hubs in developing RRI actions. To achieve this goal, authors studied, developed, and synthesized several related concepts. The main contribution of this research work is presenting the theoretical concept based on CNs applied to distinct virtual hubs aiming to promote gender responsive innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Iagher, R., Monachello, R., Warin, C.: Science with and for Society in Horizon 2020 : Achievements and Recommendations for Horizon Europe. Publications Office (2020). https://doi.org/10.2777/32018

  2. European Commission. European Semester Thematic Factsheet Research and Innovation (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Von Schomberg, R.: A vision of responsible research and innovation. Respons. Innovat. Manag. Respons. Emerg. Sci. Innov. Soc. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van den Hoven, J., Jacob, K.: Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zwart, H., Landeweerd, L., van Rooij, A.: Adapt or perish? Assessing the recent shift in the European research funding arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI.’ Life Sci. Soc. Policy 10(1), 1–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Buitendijk, S., Maes, K.: Gendered research and innovation: integrating sex and gender analysis into the research process. League Eur. Res. Univ. 18 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M.: Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: a literature review. Sci. Eng. Ethics 23(1), 1–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peckham, J.: What is responsible innovation, and why should tech giants take it seriously? Future US Inc. (2018). https://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-responsible-innovation-and-why-should-tech-giants-take-it-seriously

  9. Responsible Research and Innovation. How to Put Gender Equality into Practice? Zarządzanie Publiczne 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4467/20843968zp.16.014.7229

  10. Bansal, S., Mahendiratta, S., Kumar, S., Sarma, P., Prakash, A., Medhi, B.: Collaborative research in modern era: need and challenges. Ind. J. Pharmacol. 51(3) (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/ijp.IJP_394_19

  11. Nelson, G.: Gender Responsive National Communications Toolkit (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bose, D., Segui-Gomez, M., Crandall, J.R.: Vulnerability of female drivers involved in motor vehicle crashes: an analysis of US population at risk. Am. J. Publ. Health 101(12) (2011). https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300275

  13. Linder, A., Svedberg, W.: Review of average sized male and female occupant models in European regulatory safety assessment tests and European laws: gaps and bridging suggestions. Accid. Anal. Prevent. 127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.030

  14. Thompson, J., Blake, D.: Women’s experiences of medical miss -diagnosis: how does gender matter in healthcare settings? Women’s Stud. J. 34(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zucker, I., Prendergast, B.J.: Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women. Biol. Sex Diff. 11(1) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00308-5

  16. Perman, S.M., et al.: Public perceptions on why women receive less bystander CPR than men in out of hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation 138 (Supplement 2) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Norström, T.: Men are more likely than women to receive research funding from FAS. One explanation is that male applicants are more senior than female applicants. Lakartidningen 109, 43–44 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pulgarín, A.M.R., Woodhouse, T.: The Costs of Exclusion: Economic Consequences of the Digital Gender Gap (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Watch, U.W.: Facts & figures: rural women and the millennium development goals (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. UNESCO. Women in Science: Fact Sheet No. 55 June 2019 FS/2019/SCI/55 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wong, Y.N.: World Development Report 2012: Gender equality and development. Forum Develop. Stud. 39(3) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2012.722769

  22. Nielsen, M.W., Bloch, C.W., Schiebinger, L.: Making gender diversity work for scientific discovery and innovation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2(10) (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0433-1

  23. Huang, J.S.: Building research collaboration networks - an interpersonal perspective for research capacity building. J. Res. Admin. 45(2) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Law Insider Inc. Hub Entity Definition (2022). https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/hub-entity

  25. Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., Rizzitelli, F.: Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: an explorative analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.017

  26. Pankowska, M.: Organizational analytics in enterprise architecture development. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Highsmith, J.: Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. JO Education. Technology Innovation Hub: What do you Need to Know? (2021). https://www.joeducation.eu/technology-innovation-hub-what-do-you-need-to-know/

  29. Littlewood, D.C., Kiyumbu, W.L.: ‘Hub’ organisations in Kenya: what are they? What do they do? And what is their potential? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.031

  30. World Bank. The Business Models of mLabs and mHubs-An Evaluation of info Dev’s Mobile Innovation Support Pilots (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baark, E., Sharif, N.: From trade hub to innovation hub: the role of Hong Kong’s innovation system in linking China to global markets. Innov. Manag. Policy Pract. 8(1) (2006). https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2006.8.1.193

  32. The European Institute of Innovation & Technology (EIT). EIT Innovation Hubs (2022). https://eit.europa.eu/our-communities/eit-innovation-communities/innovation-hubs

  33. Policies for Action (P4A). Research Hubs (2022). https://www.policiesforaction.org/research-hubs

  34. O. H. and S. University. Research Hubs (2021). https://www.ohsu.edu/school-of-medicine/biomedical-sciences-graduate-program/research-hubs

  35. Selinger, M.: Learning Hubs: Where Learning Takes Place in a Digital World (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rabarijaona, L.P., Andriamaroson, B.J., Ravaoalimalala, V.E., Ravoniarimbinina, P., Migliani, R.: Digital Innovation Hubs in Smart Specialisation Strategies, vol. 67 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goetheer, J.D., Butter, M.: Digital Innovation Hubs Catalogue (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Collaborative networks: a new scientific discipline. J. Intell. Manuf. 16(4–5), 439–452 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H.: Towards a reference model for collaborative networked organizations. In: BASYS 2006. IIFIP, vol. 220, pp. 193–202. Springer, Boston (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36594-7_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. (eds.): Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling. Springer, Boston (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79426-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Project funded by the Portuguese “Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia” “Strategic program UIDB/00066/2020” (UNINOVA-CTS project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Inês Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Oliveira, A.I., Nikghadam-Hojjati, S., Ferrada, F. (2022). Responsible Research and Innovation Through Gender-Responsive Collaborative Virtual Hubs. In: Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Ortiz, A., Boucher, X., Osório, A.L. (eds) Collaborative Networks in Digitalization and Society 5.0. PRO-VE 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 662. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14844-6_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14843-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14844-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics