Skip to main content

Design of Hands-On Laboratory Supported by Simulation Software in Vocational High School

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2022)

Abstract

Vocational high school is a secondary education whose practice portion is larger than its theoretical portion. This allows students to do more hands-on practice in the laboratory, as skill competency is very important in vocational education. Through practice, students have the skills to become competent and skilled technicians in the future. When students practice in a hands-on laboratory, errors may occur that can injure students, equipment, and components. In addition, short circuits can also endanger student safety. Therefore, to improve practical skills in the laboratory, teachers must find innovative ways to incorporate these methods into the learning process. One of the things that can be done to improve students’ practical skills is to use simulation software before doing direct practice in the laboratory. In-depth interviews were conducted with three electrical engineering teachers to verify the perspective of the proposed model. The results suggest that the proposed design is likely to improve problem-solving skills when an error occurs during the simulation, and it will improve practical skills when using hands-on laboratories so that students learn more about hands-on lab practice in vocational high school.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ekmekci, A., Gulacar, O.: A case study for comparing the effectiveness of a computer simulation and a hands-on activity on learning electric circuits. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 11, 765–775 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurvitch, R., Metzler, M.W.: The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy. Teach. Teach. Educ. 25, 437–443 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baranov, A.V: Virtual students’ laboratories in the physics practicum of the technical university. In: 2016 13th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering (APEIE), pp. 326–328. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Magin, D.J., Churches, A.E., Reizes, J.A.: Design and experimentation in undergraduate mechanical engineering. In: Proceedings of a Conference on Teaching Engineering Designers, pp. 96–100. Institution of Engineers Australia, UNSW, Sydney (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Faucher, G.: The role of laboratories in engineering education. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Educ. 13, 195–198 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hofstein, A., Lunetta, V.N.: The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Educ. 88, 28–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: The experiential educator: principles and practices of experiential learning. Experience based learning systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shadiev, R., Chien, Y.C., Huang, Y.M.: Enhancing comprehension of lecture content in a foreign language as the medium of instruction: comparing speech-to-text recognition with speech-enabled language translation. SAGE Open 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020953177

  9. Rao, A.R., Dave, R.: Developing hands-on laboratory exercises for teaching STEM students the internet-of-things, cloud computing and blockchain applications. In: 2019 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), pp. 191–198. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steger, F., Nitsche, A., Arbesmeier, A., Brade, K.D., Schweiger, H.-G., Belski, I.: Teaching battery basics in laboratories: hands-on versus simulated experiments. IEEE Trans. Educ. 63, 198–208 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roschelle, J.M., Pea, R.D., Hoadley, C.M., Gordin, D.N., Means, B.M.: Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. Future Child. 76–101 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vujičić, V., Dragićević, S., Ocokoljić, D., Milićević, I., Popović, M.: Design and simulation of electro-pneumatic motion control system. Proc. TIE 8, 354–358 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shreeve, M.W.: Beyond the didactic classroom: educational models to encourage active student involvement in learning. J. Chiropr. Educ. 22, 23–28 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johnson, M., Hayes, M.J.: A comparison of problem-based and didactic learning pedagogies on an electronics engineering course. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 53, 3–22 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Y.-M., Silitonga, L.M., Murti, A.T., Wu, T.-T.: Learner engagement in a business simulation game: impact on higher-order thinking skills. J. Educ. Comput. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221106918

  16. Taher, M.T., Khan, A.S.: Effectiveness of simulation versus hands-on labs: a case study for teaching an electronics course. In: 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, pp. 26–582 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steger, F., Nitsche, A., Miley, C., Schweiger, H.-G., Belski, I.: Laboratory learning: hands-on versus simulated experiments. In: Proceedings of 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE), pp. 940–947 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Balakrishnan, B., Woods, P.C.: A comparative study on real lab and simulation lab in communication engineering from students’ perspectives. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 38, 159–171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohajan, H.K.: Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. J. Econ. Dev. Environ. People 7, 23–48 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jamshed, S.: Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J. Basic Clin. Pharm. 5, 87 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly, S.E., Bourgeault, I., Dingwall, R.: Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research, pp. 307–326 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant No. MOST 108-2628-H-224-001-MY3, MOST 110-2511-H-224-003-MY3 and MOST 110-2622-H-224-001-CC2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ting-Ting Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sarwono, E., Barroso, J., Wu, TT. (2022). Design of Hands-On Laboratory Supported by Simulation Software in Vocational High School. In: Huang, YM., Cheng, SC., Barroso, J., Sandnes, F.E. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15272-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15273-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics