Skip to main content

Exploring the Relationship Between Learning Achievement and Discussion Records in Remote Maker Activities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13449))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1286 Accesses

Abstract

Maker’s popularity worldwide has led to numerous studies on maker education to enhance learner competitiveness. One important research topic in educational research is how to effectively measure learning performance. Given the rapid development of science and technology, it is now possible to use learner discussion data to measure learning outcomes. We propose using natural language processing (NLP) technology to analyze learner discussion records by using speech-to-text technology to convert audio files into text files and using NLP technology exploring the resultant discussion texts. Experimental results reveal significant relationships between learner discussion and learning effectiveness, participation, and teamwork. This analysis also shows that high-achieving learners often discuss programming-related keywords. The proposed method can be used to analyze learner discussions and thus to measure their learning achievements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schön, S., Ebner, M., Kumar, S.: The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. eLearning Pap. 39, 14–25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kollöffel, B., de Jong, T.: Conceptual understanding of electrical circuits in secondary vocational engineering education: combining traditional instruction with inquiry learning in a virtual lab. J. Eng. Educ. 102, 375–393 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hsu, Y.-C., Baldwin, S., Ching, Y.-H.: Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends 61, 589–594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C.: Knowledge building and knowledge creation: theory, pedagogy, and technology. Camb. Handb. Learn. Sci. 2, 397–417 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Riikonen, S., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., Hakkarainen, K.: Bringing maker practices to school: tracing discursive and materially mediated aspects of student teams’ collaborative making processes. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 15, 319–349 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09330-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shan, J., Wang, W.: Making and sharing in asynchronous discussion: exploring the collaboration process in online maker community. Interact. Learn. Environ. 1–15 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Martin, L.: The promise of the maker movement for education. J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. (J-PEER) 5(1), 4 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tofel-Grehl, C., et al.: Electrifying engagement in middle school science class: improving student interest through e-textiles. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 26, 406–417 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9688-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Laal, M., Laal, M., Kermanshahi, Z.K.: 21st century learning; learning in collaboration. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 47, 1696–1701 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howe, C.: Peer Groups and Children’s Development. Wiley, Hoboken (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Mercer, N., Littleton, K.: Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Routledge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Peng, X., Xu, Q.: Investigating learners’ behaviors and discourse content in MOOC course reviews. Comput. Educ. 143, 103673 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roschelle, J., Teasley, S.D.: The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In: O’Malley, C. (ed.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69–97. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharples, M., Taylor, J., Vavoula, G.: A theory of learning for the mobile age. In: Bachmair, B. (ed.) Medienbildung in Neuen Kulturräumen, pp. 87–99. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92133-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instr. Sci. 40, 297–323 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H.J., Mulder, M., Chizari, M.: Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Comput. Educ. 61, 59–76 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F.: A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Comput. Educ. 46, 71–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hübscher, R.: Assigning students to groups using general and context-specific criteria. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 3, 178–189 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, D.G.: College classroom interactions and critical thinking. J. Educ. Psychol. 69, 180 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rathakrishnan, M., Ahmad, R., Suan, C.L.: Online discussion: Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, p. 020120. AIP Publishing LLC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Harris, Z.S.: Discourse analysis. In: Harris, Z.S., Hiż, H. (eds.) Papers on Syntax, pp. 107–142. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8467-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Knight, S., Littleton, K.: Discourse-centric learning analytics: mapping the terrain. J. Learn. Analytics 2, 185–209 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chung, C.K., Pennebaker, J.W.: Using computerized text analysis to track social processes. In: Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Oxford, New York, vol. 12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chien, Y.-C., Liu, M.-C., Wu, T.-T.: Discussion-record-based prediction model for creativity education using clustering methods. Thinking Skills Creativity, 36, 100650 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ezen-Can, A., Boyer, K.E., Kellogg, S., Booth, S.: Unsupervised modeling for understanding MOOC discussion forums: a learning analytics approach. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 146–150 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Microsoft. Makecode. https://microbit.org/projects/make-it-code-it/. Accessed 15 May 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yueh-Min Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chien, YC., Cheng, PY., Csui, LT., Yang, Y., Hooshyar, D., Huang, YM. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Between Learning Achievement and Discussion Records in Remote Maker Activities. In: Huang, YM., Cheng, SC., Barroso, J., Sandnes, F.E. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15273-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15272-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15273-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics