Skip to main content

Teachers’ Preparedness for Integrating Programming and Computational Thinking in Art and Crafts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World (I3E 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13454))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1817 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years considerable emphasis has been placed on fostering students’ computational thinking and programming skills through compulsory education. Norway is one of few countries where these skills are explicitly included in the curriculum for practical and aesthetical subjects. This paper concerns a qualitative study of potential barriers for teachers’ adoption of programming in the subject A&C in Norwegian compulsory education. Preliminary findings suggest that a gap exists between the expectations from the curriculum concerning programming and CT in the subject art and crafts, and teachers’ classroom practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://gsi.udir.no/ (in Norwegian).

References

  1. Bocconi, S., et al.: Developing computational thinking in compulsory education - implications for policy and practice (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Earp, J.: The nordic approach to introducing computational thinking and programming in compulsory education, 01 January 2018

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bocconi, S., et al.: Reviewing computational thinking in compulsory education. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tannert, M., Lorentzen, R.F., Berthelsen, U.D.: Computational Thinking as Subject Matter: As an Independent Subject or Integrated across Subjects? Routlegde, New York and London (2021). https://www.routledge.com/Computational-Thinking-in-Education-A-Pedagogical-Perspective/Yadav-Berthelsen/p/book/9780367610357

  5. Ministry of Education and Research. Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet (2020). https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/2019

  6. Kaufmann, O.T., Stenseth, B.: Programming in mathematics education. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 52(7), 1–20 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Digranes, I.: The norwegian school subject art and crafts - tradition and contemporary debate. FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk 2(2) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ministry of Education and Research. Curriculum for Art and crafts (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dexter, S.L., Anderson, R.E., Becker, H.J.: Teachers’ views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 31(3), 221–239 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Breiner, J.M., Harkness, S.S., Johnson, C.C., Koehler, C.M.: What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. Sch. Sci. Math. 112(1), 3–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Binkley, M., et al.: Defining twenty-first century skills. In: Griffin, P., McGaw, B., Care, E. (eds.) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, pp. 17–66. Springer, Dordrecht (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Erstad, O.: The assessment and teaching of 21st century skills project. Nordic J. Digit. Lit. 4(03–04), 204–211 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Land, M.H.: Full STEAM ahead: the benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Proc. Comput. Sci. 20, 547–552 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Perignat, E., Katz-Buonincontro, J.: STEAM in practice and research: an integrative literature review. Thinking Skills Creat. 31, 31–43 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M.N., Jaccheri, L.: Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning: a literature review. Entertain. Comput. 18, 57–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mindstorms, P.S.: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, viii, 230 p. Basic Books, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wing, J.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lye, S.Y., Koh, J.H.L.: Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Comput. Hum. Behav. 41, 51–61 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brennan, K., Resnick, M. (eds.): New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Denning, P.J., Tedre, M.: Computational thinking: a disciplinary perspective. Inform. Educ. 20, 361–390 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shute, V.J., Sun, C., Asbell-Clarke, J.: Demystifying computational thinking. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 142–158 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ertmer, P.A.: Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: strategies for technology integration. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 47(4), 47–61 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hew, K.F., Brush, T.: Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 55(3), 223–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ertmer, P.A.: Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 53(4), 25–39 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Perlic, B.: Lærerkompetanse i grunnskolen. Statistics Norway (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tjora, A.H.: Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis. 4. utgave. Gyldendal, Oslo (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Clarke, V., Braun, V., Hayfield, N.: Thematic analysis. Qual. Psychol.: Pract. Guide Res. Methods. 2015(222), 248 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rogde, K., et al.: Spørsmål til Skole-Norge: analyser og resultater fra Utdanningsdirektoratets spørreundersøkelse til skoler og skoleeiere våren 2020. The Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xie, K., Nelson, M.J., Cheng, S.-L., Jiang, Z.: Examining changes in teachers’ perceptions of external and internal barriers in their integration of educational digital resources in K-12 classrooms. J. Res. Technol. Education. 1–26 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T.: Teacher technology change. J. Res. Technol. Educ. 42(3), 255–284 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hatlevik, O.E.: Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 61(5), 555–567 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ertmer, P.A., Paul, A., Molly, L., Eva, R., Denise, W.: Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 32(1), 54–72 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Markus, M.L., Silver, M.S.: A foundation for the study of it effects: a new look at DeSanctis and Poole’s concepts of structural features and spirit. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(10), 5 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristine Sevik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sevik, K., Tømte, C.E. (2022). Teachers’ Preparedness for Integrating Programming and Computational Thinking in Art and Crafts. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World. I3E 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15341-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15342-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics