Skip to main content

Clustering Design Science Research Based on the Nature of the Designed Artifact

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World (I3E 2022)

Abstract

During the past two decades, Design Science Research (DSR) has become a central research paradigm in information systems (IS) science. It provides a possibility for researchers to contribute to their field’s existing knowledge base by abstracting knowledge from constructing and using design artifacts. DSR scholars have classified their research paradigm by its potential knowledge contributions looking into dimensions such as researcher role, research activity, and knowledge type. Despite the central role of design artifacts in DSR, we know little about the role of these artifacts for DSR’s knowledge contribution. We therefore extend the discussion on DSR knowledge contributions to the nature of design artifacts, asking how the nature of design artifacts clusters DSR research and its potential knowledge contributions. To answer this research question, we conducted a literature review of DSR research and selected a sample of 20 papers published during the years 2017–2021 in four major IS journals. We found that the nature of the design artifact forms clusters of knowledge contribution and research activity. Our study suggests a relationship between design artifacts, abstractions of knowledge from these artifacts and the conducted research activities. We acknowledge that this relationship stems from a relatively small sample of DSR studies and propose that further research is needed to confirm our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbasi, A., Dobolyi, D., Vance, A., Zahedi, F.M.: The phishing funnel model: a design artifact to predict user susceptibility to phishing websites. Inf. Syst. Res. 32(2), 410–436 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbasi, A., Zhou, Y., Deng, S., Zhang, P.: Text analytics to support sense-making in social media: a language-action perspective. MIS Q. 42(2), 427–464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13239

  3. Akhlaghpour, S., Lapointe, L.: From placebo to panacea: studying the diffusion of IT management techniques with ambiguous efficiencies: the case of capability maturity model. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(06), 441–502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00498

  4. Baird, A., Maruping, L.M.: The next generation of research on IS use: a theoretical framework of delegation to and from agentic IS artifacts. MIS Q. 45(1), 315–341 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15882

  5. Barua, A., Mani, D.: Reexamining the market value of information technology events. Inf. Syst. Res. 29(1), 225–240 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gergor, S., Hevner, A., Rossi, M.: Design science research contributions: finding a balance between artifact and theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(5), 358–376 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00495

  7. Bouayad, L., Padmanabhan, B., Chari, K.: Audit policies under the sentinel effect: deterrence-driven algorithms. Inf. Syst. Res. 30(2), 466–485 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gregor, S., Kruse, L.C., Seidel, S.: The anatomy of a design principle. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00129

  9. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

  10. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(5), 312–335 (2007). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00129

  11. Haki, K., Beese, J., Aier, S., Winter, R.: The evolution of information systems architecture: an agent-based simulation model. MIS Q. 44(1), 155–184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14494

  12. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–106 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ho, Y.-C., Wu, J., Tan, Y.: Disconfirmation effect on online rating behavior: a structural model. Inf. Syst. Res. 28(3), 626–642 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iivari, J.: Editorial: a critical look at theories in design science research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 21(3), 502–519 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00610

  15. Kuechler, B., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research: anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 489–504 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lehrer, C., Wieneke, A., vom Brocke, J., Jung, R., Seidel, S.: How big data analytics enables service innovation: materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 35(2), 424–460 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, Y., Xie, Y., Zeng, Z.: Modeling multichannel advertising attribution across competitors. MIS Q. 43(1), 287–312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/14257

  18. Lin, Y.-K., Chen, H., Brown, R. A., Li, S.-H., Yang, H.-J.: Healthcare predictive analytics for risk profiling in chronic care: a Bayesian multitask learning approach. MIS Q. 41(2), 473–495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.2.07

  19. Maedche, A., Gregor, S., Parsons, J.: Mapping design contributions in information systems research: the design research activity framework. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 49(1), 355–378 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04914

  20. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maruping, L.M., Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y.L., Zhang, X.: A risk mitigation framework for information technology projects: a cultural contingency perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 36(1), 120–157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1550555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miah, S.J., Gammack, J.G., McKay, J.: A Metadesign theory for tailorable decision support. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 570–603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00544

  23. Mingers, J., Standing, C.: A framework for validating information systems research based on a pluralist account of truth and correctness. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 117–151 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00594

  24. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piel, J.-H., Hamann, J.F.H., Koukal, A., Breitner, M.H.: Promoting the system integration of renewable energies: toward a decision support system for incentivizing spatially diversified deployment. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 34(4), 994–1022 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1394044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Silic, M., Lowry, P.B.: Using design-science based gamification to improve organizational security training and compliance. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 129–161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2019.1705512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Velichety, S, Ram, S.: Finding a needle in the haystack: recommending online communities on social media platforms using network and design science. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 22(5), 1285–1310 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00694

  28. Wu, Y., Choi, B., Guo, X., Chang, K.: Understanding user adaptation toward a new IT system in organizations: a social network perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 18(11), 787–813 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00473

  29. Xie, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, D.: Unveiling the hidden truth of drug addiction: a social media approach using similarity network-based deep learning. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 38(1), 166–195 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1870388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye, X., Peng, X., Wang, X., Teo, H.-H.: Developing and testing a theoretical path model of web page impression formation and its consequence. Inf. Syst. Res. 31(3), 929–949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0924

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matti Minkkinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Laine, J., Zimmer, M.P., Minkkinen, M., Salmela, H., Mäntymäki, M. (2022). Clustering Design Science Research Based on the Nature of the Designed Artifact. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World. I3E 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15341-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15342-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics