Skip to main content

From Responsible AI Governance to Competitive Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Capabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World (I3E 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13454))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In a constantly changing environment, researchers and practitioners are concerned with the issue of whether responsible artificial intelligence (AI) governance can help build competitive advantage. Responsible AI governance should be viewed as a source of competitive edge rather than merely a quick fix for automating manual processes. Despite this, little empirical evidence is available to support this claim, and even less is understood about the dimensions and relationships that add business value. This paper develops a conceptual model to explain how responsible AI governance practices aligned with strategic goals lead to competitive performance gains. An investigation of 144 Nordic firms is conducted to verify our hypotheses using a PLS-SEM analysis. Findings reveal that deploying responsible AI governance will make a significant positive impact on an organizations’ knowledge management capabilities directly and on competitive performance indirectly. These findings also suggest that implementing responsible AI governance improves firms’ ability to acquire and distribute knowledge when there is strategic alignment with a firm’s goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schmidt, R., Zimmermann, A., Möhring, M., Keller, B.: Value creation in connectionist artificial intelligence–a research agenda. In: Value Creation in Connectionist Artificial Intelligence–A Research Agenda (Americas Conference on Information Systems: AMCIS/Association for 2020), pp. 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rodrigues, A.R.D., Ferreira, F.A., Teixeira, F.J., Zopounidis, C.: Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: a multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework. Res. Int. Bus. Finan 60, 101616 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (2021). https://ai.google/static/documents/perspectives-on-issues-in-ai-governance.pdf. Accessed 16 Nov 2021

  4. de Laat, P.B.: Companies committed to responsible AI: from principles towards implementation and regulation? Philos. Technol. 34(4), 1135–1193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00474-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Singapore-Government: model artificial intelligence governance framework. In: Model Artificial Intelligence Governance Framework (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cihon, P., Schuett, J., Baum, S.D.: Corporate governance of artificial intelligence in the public interest. Information 12(7), 275 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Enholm, I.M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J.: Artificial intelligence and business value: a literature review. Inf. Syst. Front. 1–26 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandhawalia, B.S., Dalcher, D.: Developing knowledge management capabilities: a structured approach. J. Knowl. Manage. 15(2), 313–328 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I.M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J.: Toward AI governance: identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes. Inf. Syst. Front. 1–19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10251-y

  10. Yang, X., Yu, X., Liu, X.: Obtaining a sustainable competitive advantage from patent information: a patent analysis of the graphene industry. Sustainability 10(12), 4800 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., Podsakoff, N.P.: Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Q. 35(2), 293–334 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., Leih, S.: Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif. Manage. Rev. 58(4), 13–35 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amershi, S., et al.: Software engineering for machine learning: a case study. In: Software Engineering for Machine Learning: A Case Study, pp. 291–300. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, Y., Xiong, M., Olya, H.: Toward an understanding of responsible artificial intelligence practices. In: Toward an Understanding of Responsible Artificial Intelligence Practices (Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)), pp. 4962–4971 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., Aben, M.: Making the most of your company’s knowledge: a strategic framework. Long Range Plan. 34(4), 421–439 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Minkkinen, M., Zimmer, M.P., Mäntymäki, M.: Towards ecosystems for responsible AI. In: Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y.K., Pappas, I., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2021. LNCS, vol. 12896, pp. 220–232. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Adam Cutler, A.W., Paka, A.: Staying ahead of the curve: the business case for responsible AI. In: Staying Ahead of the Curve: The Business Case for Responsible AI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mikalef, P., Gupta, M.: Artificial intelligence capability: conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Inf. Manag. 58(3), 103434 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sander, F., Semeijn, J., Mahr, D.: The acceptance of blockchain technology in meat traceability and transparency. Br. Food J. 120(9), 2066–2079 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Papagiannidis, E., Enholm, I.M., Dremel, C., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J.: Deploying AI governance practices: a revelatory case study. In: Dennehy, D., Griva, A., Pouloudi, N., Dwivedi, Y.K., Pappas, I., Mäntymäki, M. (eds.) I3E 2021. LNCS, vol. 12896, pp. 208–219. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanriverdi, H.: Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance on multibusiness firms. MIS Q. 29(2), 311–334 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mao, H., Liu, S., Zhang, J., Deng, Z.: Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: the moderating role of resource commitment. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(6), 1062–1074 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, S.P.-J., Straub, D.W., Liang, T.-P.: How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance. MIS Q. 39(2), 497–518 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tallon, P.P., Pinsonneault, A.: Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS Q. 35(2), 463–486 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Preston, D.S., Karahanna, E.: Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: a nomological network. Inf. Syst. Res. 20(2), 159–179 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rai, A., Tang, X.: Leveraging IT capabilities and competitive process capabilities for the management of interorganizational relationship portfolios. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(3), 516–542 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lwakatare, L.E., Raj, A., Bosch, J., Olsson, H.H., Crnkovic, I.: A taxonomy of software engineering challenges for machine learning systems: an empirical investigation. In: Kruchten, P., Fraser, S., Coallier, F. (eds.) XP 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 355, pp. 227–243. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Dignum, V.: Responsibility and artificial intelligence. Oxford Handb. Ethics AI 4698, 215 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng, S.-M., Lee, P.-S.: The effect of knowledge management capability and dynamic capability on organizational performance. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 27(2), 158–179 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P., Wilson, D.: Using and validating the strategic alignment model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 13(3), 223–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwab, K.: The global competitiveness report 2019. In: World Economic Forum, vol. 9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schwab, K., Zahidi, S.: The global competitiveness report special edition 2020: how countries are performing on the road to recovery. In: World Economic Forum (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3, Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ringle, C.M., Wende, S., Becker, J.-M.: SmartPLS 3. SmartPLS GmbH, Boenningstedt. J. Ser. Sci. Manag. 10(3), 32–49 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rana, N.P., Chatterjee, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Akter, S.: Understanding dark side of artificial intelligence (AI) integrated business analytics: assessing firm’s operational inefficiency and competitiveness. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 31(3), 1–24 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rakova, B., Yang, J., Cramer, H., Chowdhury, R.: Where responsible AI meets reality: practitioner perspectives on enablers for shifting organizational practices. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5(CSCW1), 1–23 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., Dwivedi, Y.K.: Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of big data–evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 48, 63–71 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanouil Papagiannidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., Krogstie, J., Conboy, K. (2022). From Responsible AI Governance to Competitive Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Capabilities. In: Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Gupta, S., Dwivedi, Y.K., Mäntymäki, M., Pappas, I.O. (eds) The Role of Digital Technologies in Shaping the Post-Pandemic World. I3E 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15342-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15341-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15342-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics