Skip to main content

Measurements of Support Processes: Proposed Improvements on Automotive SPICE PAM V3.1 in Light of OEM Standard Supplier Quality Requirements

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1646))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1471 Accesses

Abstract

A need for process metrics arises automatically when an organization chooses to comply with a formal process standard such as Automotive SPICE, while product metrics are an essential tool to measure the compliance, progress and quality of the deliverable. Metrics collected during the development process have the purpose of describing important indicators of the product's health aspects as well as how good the development process is being applied and how successful it is. For both product and process, well-chosen metrics will show what needs to be improved, and linking those measurable customer standard supplier quality requirements with system or software-related efforts and activities in an organization is a necessary metric [10]. However, this is a challenging task, and there is a lack of methods addressing this gap.

In this paper, we propose a solution to the problem of fully covering and reporting the OEM quality requirements by providing an improvement proposal to automotive process models such as A-SPICE; this improvement shall encompass a measurement based quality metrics approach that helps the quality assurance experts making objective and comparable decisions in system/software projects. This can happen by defining and assessing measurable quality goals and thresholds, & by directly relating these to an escalation mechanism, and guaranteeing that this approach will be verified and monitored during A-SPICE assessments of relevant support process areas.

N. Moselhy—Principal ASPICE Assessor, SYS-SW Quality Manager, SAFe ASM, and Process Quality Expert.

Y. Ali—Provisional ASPICE Assessor, and SYS-SW Quality Engineer.

R. Mamdouh—Provisional ASPICE Assessor, and SYS-SW Senior Quality Engineer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Software Engineering Institute: Software Assurance Measurement—State of the Practice, CMU/SEI-2013-TN-019, November 2013

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basili, V.R.: Software modeling and measurement: the Goal/Question/Metric paradigm (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kelemen, Z.D.: A measurement based software quality framework. https://www.academia.edu/7968218/A_measurement_based_software_quality_framework

  4. Gerber, A.: Process Metrics – Making Quality Measurable. https://knuevenermackert.com/en/process-metrics-making-quality-measurable/

  5. Automotive SPICE® Process Reference Model, Process Assessment Model Version 3.1, 1 November 2017. https://www.automotivespice.com/fileadmin/software-download/AutomotiveSPICE_PAM_31.pdf

  6. SPI MANIFESTO [Version A.1.2.2010]

    Google Scholar 

  7. VDA Guidelines for Automotive SPICE® September 2017, 1st edn. https://webshop.vda.de/qmc/en/automotive-spice-guidelines_1stedit2017

  8. Kaizen Institute: MUDA, MURA, MURI

    Google Scholar 

  9. Meli, R.: Software Measurement European Forum (SMEF) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO 9001:2015: Quality management systems Requirements, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  11. ISO - International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262 Road vehicles Functional Safety Part 1-10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. CMMI for development V3.1 - PPQA

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hoermann, K., Mueller, M., Dittmann, L., Zimmer J.: Automotive SPICE in Practice: Surviving Implementation and Assessment, Rocky Noor (2008). ISBN 978-1933952291

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sassenburg, H., Kitson, D.: A Comparative Analysis of CMMI and Automotive SPICE, Presentation, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  15. https://sites.google.com/a/valeo.com/automotive-quality-standards/. Accessed Jan 2019

  16. https://www.qaiglobalinstitute.com/product/csqa-preparatory-training/

  17. The study has been conducted on 8 OEM requirements as you can see in the consolidation, however, for the sake of presentation, in the data collection section of this paper we will show samples of 4 OEMs only and anonymously

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noha Moselhy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Moselhy, N., Ali, Y., Mamdouh, R. (2022). Measurements of Support Processes: Proposed Improvements on Automotive SPICE PAM V3.1 in Light of OEM Standard Supplier Quality Requirements. In: Yilmaz, M., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R., Wöran, B. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1646. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15559-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15559-8_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15558-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15559-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics