Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Promoting Worker Wellbeing in the Era of Data Economy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination (HCC 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 656))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

The data economy is expanding, and SMEs (small- and medium-sized enterprises) have found themselves under increasing pressure to digitalise their processes and to adopt data-based solutions for business development. SMEs act in an ever more networked data economy ecosystems with a great number of information systems, digital technologies, and interfaces to learn to keep up with the competition. Digital transformation has been accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic, which forced many companies to take immediate digital leaps without proper preparation.

Meanwhile, data economy and digitalisation challenge worker wellbeing in SMEs in an unprecedented way: skills of entrepreneurs and workers related to digitised work seem to lag behind, leaving them with technostress and difficulties with coping and managing one’s own work and collaboration. This has potential for serious negative impacts on structural, social and psychological capital, which all affect the overall wellbeing capital in SMEs.

To tackle these issues, Wellbeing at Work from Digitalisation (WWFD) project was established to develop a fair, participatory and sustainable framework for SMEs to build their skills and worker wellbeing in the context of the data economy. It aims at placing the knowledge worker in control of their work by offering tools for building worker wellbeing as wellbeing capital. Based on the initial mapping in Finnish SMEs around Turku region, the toolbox is built around workplace democracy, value alignment, skill development and knowledge sharing to ensure that worker wellbeing is not compromised while encouraging the ever-better acquisition of digital technologies. The toolbox will be piloted in SMEs and refined further, and the final manual for WWFD will be published in Fall 2023.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abelein, U., Paech, B.: Understanding the influence of user participation and involvement on system success–a systematic mapping study. Empir. Softw. Eng. 20(1), 28–81 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aho, E.: Kasvun mahdollisuus–positiivisen rakennemuutoksen hyödyntäminen lounais-suomessa (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., Knight, G.: Covid-19 and digitalization: the great acceleration. J. Bus. Res. 136, 602–611 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayyagari, R., Grover, V., Purvis, R.: Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q. 35, 831–858 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Billett, S.: Mediating worklife learning and the digitalisation of work. Br. J. Educ. Tech. 52(4), 1580–1593 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Böckerman, P., Bryson, A., Ilmakunnas, P.: Does high involvement management improve worker wellbeing? J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 84(2), 660–680 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ. Sci. 2(1), 40–57 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Califf, C.B., Sarker, S., Sarker, S.: The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare it. MIS Q. 44(2) 809–856 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, A., Karahanna, E.: Life interrupted: the effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Q. 42(4), 1023–1042 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cooper, C.L., Cartwright, S.: Healthy mind; healthy organization—a proactive approach to occupational stress. Hum. Relat. 47(4), 455–471 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, R.B., Zmud, R.W.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manage. Sci. 36(2), 123–139 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Couldry, N., Mejias, U.A.: Data colonialism: rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Telev. New Media 20(4), 336–349 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Curry, E., Sheth, A.: Next-generation smart environments: from system of systems to data ecosystems. IEEE Intell. Syst. 33(03), 69–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2018.033001418

  14. Dahl, R.A.: Democracy and its Critics. Yale University Press, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferreras, I.: Firms as Political Entities : Saving Democracy through Economic Bicameralism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Field, J.C., Chan, X.W.: Contemporary knowledge workers and the boundaryless work–life interface: Implications for the human resource management of the knowledge workforce. Front. Psychol. 9, 2414 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frega, R.: Against analogy: why analogical arguments in support of workplace democracy must necessarily fail. Democratic Theor. 7(1), 1–26 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frega, R., Herzog, L., Neuhäuser, C.: Workplace democracy—the recent debate. Philos Compass 14(4), e12574 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerlsbeck, F., Herzog, L.: The epistemic potentials of workplace democracy. Rev. Soc. Econ. 78(3), 307–330 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hakanen, J.: Työn imua, tuottavuutta ja kukoistavia työpaikkoja? – kohti laadukasta työelämää. Työsuojelurahasto, Helsinki (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hesketh, I., Cooper, C.: Wellbeing at Work: how to Design, Implement and Evaluate an Effective Strategy. Kogan Page Publishers, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hirvonen, O., Breen, K.: Recognitive arguments for workplace democracy. Constellations Int. J. Crit. Democratic Theor. 27(4) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hsieh, N.H.: workplace democracy, workplace republicanism, and economic democracy workplace democracy: why not? Revue de philosophie économique 9(1), 57–78 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hyrynsalmi, S., Hyrynsalmi, S.M.: Ecosystem: a zombie category? In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 1–8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2019.8792658

  25. Ivančić, L., Vukšić, V.B., Spremić, M.: Mastering the digital transformation process: business practices and lessons learned. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 9(2), 36–50 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karasek Jr, R.A.: Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(2), 285–308 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Knight, C., Patterson, M., Dawson, J.: Building work engagement: a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. J. Organ. Behav. 38(6), 792–812 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Knudsen, H., Busck, O., Lind, J.: Work environment quality: the role of workplace participation and democracy. Work Employ Soc. 25(3), 379–396 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Koskinen, J., Knaapi-Junnila, S., Rantanen, M.M.: What if we had fair, people-centred data economy ecosystems? In: Proceedings - 2019 IEEE SmartWorld, Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, SmartWorld/UIC/ATC/SCALCOM/IOP/SCI 2019, pp. 329–334 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00100

  30. Lammi, M., Pantzar, M.: The data economy: How technological change has altered the role of the citizen-consumer. Technol. Soc. 59 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101157

  31. Landemore, H., Ferreras, I.: In defense of workplace democracy: towards a justification of the firm–state analogy. Polit. Theor. 44(1), 53–81 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Larjovuori, R.L., Ligthart, R., Heikkilä-Tammi, K., Keränen, K., Bordi, L., Laakkonen, T., Mäkiniemi, J.P.: Digimuutos tehdään yhdessä (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lawson, K.J., Noblet, A.J., Rodwell, J.J.: Promoting employee wellbeing: the relevance of work characteristics and organizational justice. Health Promot. Int. 24(3), 223–233 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mäkiniemi, J.P., Ahola, S., Joensuu, J.: A novel construct to measure employees’ technology-related experiences of well-being: empirical validation of the technowork engagement scale (technowes) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Manka, M.L., Manka, M.: Työhyvinvointi (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martel, J.P., Dupuis, G.: Quality of work life: theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Soc. Indic. Res. 77(2), 333–368 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nieminen, J.: Alueelliset kehitysnäkymät–kevät 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nisafani, A.S., Kiely, G., Mahony, C.: Workers’ technostress: a review of its causes, strains, inhibitors, and impacts. J. Dec. Syst. 29, 1–16 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oliveira, M.I.S., Lima, G.D.F.B., Lóscio, B.F.: Investigations into data ecosystems: a systematic mapping study. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 61(2), 589–630 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. O’Neill, M.: Three Rawlsian routes towards economic democracy. Revue de philosophie économique 9(1), 29–55 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prilleltensky, I.: Wellness as fairness. Am. J. Community Psychol. 49(1–2), 1–21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rantanen, M.M., Koskinen, J.: Humans of the European data economy ecosystem - what do they demand from a fair data economy? In: Kreps, D., Komukai, T., Gopal, T.V., Ishii, K. (eds.) HCC 2020. IAICT, vol. 590, pp. 327–339. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62803-1_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Reiman, A., Väyrynen, S.: Holistic well-being and sustainable organisations–a review and argumentative propositions. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 11(5), 321–329 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B.: Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J. Organ. Behav. Int. J. Ind. Occup. Organ. Psychol. Behav. 25(3), 293–315 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seligman, M.E., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Positive psychology: an introduction. In: Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology, pp. 279–298. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shujahat, M., Sousa, M.J., Hussain, S., Nawaz, F., Wang, M., Umer, M.: Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: the neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity. J. Bus. Res. 94, 442– 450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.11.001, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829631730440X

  47. Sorger, M., Ralph, B.J., Hartl, K., Woschank, M., Stockinger, M.: Big data in the metal processing value chain: a systematic digitalization approach under special consideration of standardization and SMEs. Appl. Sci. 11(19), 9021 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Soto, W.C., DiDona, T., Aguililla, A.L.G., Ramirez, R., Marrero, P.: Wellbeing, fairness, and supervisor’s ability and support. Int. J. Sci. Res. Pub. 8(5), 90–100 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sparr, J.L., Sonnentag, S.: Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psy. 17(2), 198–225 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tan, Z.M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L.: The ethical debate about the gig economy: a review and critical analysis. Technol. Soc. 65, 101594 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101594, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X21000695

  51. Taylor, H.: Tacit knowledge: conceptualizations and operationalizations. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. (IJKM) 3(3), 60–73 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Timan, T., van Oirsouw, C., Hoekstra, M.: The role of data regulation in shaping AI: an overview of challenges and recommendations for SMEs. In: Curry, E., Metzger, A., Zillner, S., Pazzaglia, J.-C., García Robles, A. (eds.) The Elements of Big Data Value, pp. 355–376. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68176-0_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  53. Van Dierendonck, D., Haynes, C., Borrill, C., Stride, C.: Leadership behavior and subordinate well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 9(2), 165 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Van Doorn, N., Badger, A.: Platform capitalism’s hidden abode: producing data assets in the gig economy. Antipode 52(5), 1475–1495 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Vuori, V., Helander, N., Okkonen, J.: Digitalization in knowledge work: the dream of enhanced performance. Cogn. Technol. Work 21(2), 237–252 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., Bendz, T.: An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during covid-19. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 429–442 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Walters, J.D.T.: On the efficiency objection to workplace democracy. Ethical Theor. Moral Pract. 24, 803–815 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10192-6

  58. Wamba, S.F., Akter, S., Trinchera, L., De Bourmont, M.: Turning information quality into firm performance in the big data economy. Manag. Decis. 57(8), 1756–1783 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, S., Wang, H.: Big data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME): acknowledge management model. J. Knowl. Manag. 24, 881–897 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yean, T.F., et al.: Organizational justice: a conceptual discussion. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 219, 798–803 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yeoman, R.: Meaningful Work and Workplace Democracy: A Philosophy of Work and a Politics of Meaningfulness. Springer, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137370587

  62. Zuboff, S.: Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. J. Inf. Technol. 30(1), 75–89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5, https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5

  63. Zuboff, S.: Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. New Labor Forum 28(1), 10–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Information System Sciences, Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Salla Ponkala, Jani Koskinen, Camilla Lähteenmäki & Antti Tuomisto

Authors
  1. Salla Ponkala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jani Koskinen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Camilla Lähteenmäki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antti Tuomisto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salla Ponkala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Galway, Galway, Ireland

    David Kreps

  2. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Robert Davison

  3. Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan

    Taro Komukai

  4. Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan

    Kaori Ishii

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ponkala, S., Koskinen, J., Lähteenmäki, C., Tuomisto, A. (2022). Promoting Worker Wellbeing in the Era of Data Economy. In: Kreps, D., Davison, R., Komukai, T., Ishii, K. (eds) Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination. HCC 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15688-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation