Abstract
In spite of good intentions to develop effective ICT regulatory frameworks that foster universal access, improve competition, drive down access cost, address disputes between stakeholders and create equal opportunities to enter the sector, the outcomes often fail to match their preferences. The development of ICT regulatory frameworks in developing countries is dependent on lessons drawn from industrialised countries. Since the models from different countries have their strengths and weakness, it is imperative to investigate the causes of failure, to compile the strengths and avoid the weaknesses that are documented in literature as a first step to developing any effective ICT regulatory framework.
This paper presents an integrative literature review on regulatory frameworks in developing countries using Habermasian Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) which views discourse under an Ideal Speech Situation. After a key word selection, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Synthesis (PRISMS) model was employed by three researchers and a compilation of 30 papers was drawn from an initial list of 90 papers from AIS, Research4lLife, Googlescholar and Academia.edu data bases. The results present the components of an effective ICT regulatory model for developing countries as a hub and spoke framework with institutionalism as the hub that supports the rest, and all under a common jurisdiction and legislative context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adam, A.: Gender, emancipation and critical information systems. In: The 9th European Conference on Information Systems Bled, Slovenia, 27–29 June 2001 (2001). https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=ecis2001
Benbasat, I., Zmud, R.W.: The identity crisis within the is discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Q. 27(2), 183–194 (2003)
Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34 (2014). Article 12. http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol34/iss1/12
Brownn, A.C., Stern, J., Tenenbaum, B.: Handbook for Evaluating Infrastructure Regulatory Systems (2006). chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl= https%3A%2F%2Fppp.worldbank.org%2Fpublic-private-partnership%2Fsites%2Fppp.world bank.org%2Ffiles%2Fdocuments%2Fworld_bank-_ppiaf-_handbook_for_evaluating_ infrastructure_regulatory_systems_2006_english.pdf&chunk=true
Cheng, Z.A., Dimoka, A., Pavlou, P.A.: Context may be king, but generalizability is the Emperor! J. Inf. Technol. 31(3), 257–264 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0005-7
Chen, Y., Zahedi, F.M.: Individuals’ internet security perceptions and behaviors: polycontextual contrasts between the United States and China. MIS Q. 40(1), 205–222 (2016)
Chiumbu, S.H.: Understanding the role and influence of external actors and ideas in African information, communication and technology policies: the African information society initiative. Ph.D. thesis. University of Oslo, Oslo, 1 February 2008
Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G.: Context is king! Considering particularism in research design and reporting. J. Inf. Technol. 31(3), 241–249 (2018)
Gadamer, H.-G.: Truth and Method. The Continuing Publishing Corporation, New York (1986)
Galhardo, J.A.G.: ICT regulation process in a civil law, peripheral, and multilevel administration country: Habermas’ deliberative paradigm revisited. In: Kommers, P., Viana, A.B.N., Issa, T., Isaías, P., Issa, T. (eds.) IADIS International Conference Internet Technologies and Society 2020, pp. 105–109. International Association for Development of the Information Society, São Paulo (2020). http://www.iadisportal.org/digital-library/ict-regulationprocess-in-a-civil-law-peripheral-and-multilevel-administration-country-habermas-deliberativeparadigm-revisited
Galhardo, J.A.G., de Souza, C.A.: ICT regulation process: Habermas meets the multiple streams framework. In: AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, 16 (2020). https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2020/adv_info_systems_research/adv_info_systems_research/16
Geeling, S., Brown, I., Weimann, P.: Information systems and culture - a systematic hermeneutic literature review. In: CONF-IRM 2016 Proceedings, Paper 40 (2016). http://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2016/40
Gülen, G., Makaryan, R., Volkov, D., Foss, M.: Improving regulatory agency efficiency and effectiveness best practices, processes and organizational structures. In: Proceedings, 11th Annual Conference of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, Reykjavik, Iceland, vol. 23 (2007)
Habermas, J.: Knowledge and Human Interests. Beacon Press, Boston (1972a)
Habermas, J.: Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Shapiro, J.J. (Trans.). Heinemann, London (1972b)
Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action: Reasons and Rationalization of Society. Mccarthy, T. (Trans.). Beacon Press, Boston (1984)
Habermas, J.: The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifewolrd and Social System. Mccarthy, T. (Trans.). Beacon Press, Boston (1987)
Wadhwa, D., Hallur, G.: Comparative analysis of ICT regulation frameworks: a study of seven countries (2013)
Hallur, G.G., Sane, V.S.: Indian telecom regulatory framework in comparison with five countries: structure, role description and funding. Digit. Policy Regul. Gov. 20(1), 62–77 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-06-2017-0035
José Antonio Gouvêa, G., de Souza, C.A.: ICT regulation process: Habermas meets the multiple streams framework. In: AMCIS 2020 Proceedings 16 (2020)
Klein, H., Myers, M.A.: Set of principals for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–94 (1999)
Kunyenje, G., Chigona, W.: External actors’ influence on national ICT policy in developing countries: a literature review. In: ACIST 2017, pp. 1–10. ACIST, Cape Town (2017)
Levi-Faur, D.: The odyssey of the regulatory state: from a ‘Thin’ monomorphic concept to a ‘Thick’ and polymorphic concept article in law & policy, April 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12000
Makoza, F., Chigona, W.: How gender is embedded in the national ICT policy of Malawi. In: Proceedings for CPRsouth8/CPRafrica 2013 Conference, Mysore, India, 5–7 September, 2013, pp. 1–20 (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2531859. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2531859
Mingers, J., Walsham, G.: Toward ethical information systems: the contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Q. 34(4), 833–854 (2010). https://www.jstor.org/stable/25750707
Mollel, A.: The legal and regulatory framework for ICT in developing countries: case study of ICT and the law of evidence in Tanzania. A paper delivered at IPID ICT4D PG/PhD Symposium (2008)
Mollel, A.: The legal and regulatory framework for ICT in developing countries: case study of ICT and the law of evidence in Tanzania. A paper delivered at IPID ICT4D PG/PhD Symposium, 7–9 September 2008 (2008)
Nesti, G.: Strengthening the accountability of independent regulatory agencies: from performance back to democracy. Comp. Eur. Polit. 16, 464–481 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2016.24
North-Samardzic, A.: Biometric technology and ethics: beyond security applications. J. Bus. Ethics 167(3), 433–450 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04143-6
Okoli, C.: A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 43 (2015)
Palvia, P., Baqir, N., Nemati, H.: ICT policies in developing countries: an evaluation with the extended design-actuality gaps framework. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 71(1), 1–34 (2015)
Paré, G., Trudel, M.C., Jaana, M., Kitsiou, S.: Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf. Manag. 52(2), 183–199 (2015)
Pare, G., Tate, M., Johnstone, D., Kitsiou, S.: Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 25(6), 493–508 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41303-016-0020-3
Pentland, B.T.: Information systems and organizational learning: the social epistemology of organizational knowledge systems. Account. Manag. Inf. Technol. 5(1), 1–21 (1995)
Radnitzky, G.: Contemporary Schools of Metascience. Humanities Press/Henry Regnery Company, Chicago (1973)
Ricoeur, P.: Hermeneutics and the Human Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Ravichandran, T., Lertwongsatien, C., Lertwongsatien, C.: Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21(4), 237–276 (2005)
Rowe, F.: What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(3), 241–255 (2014)
Torraco, R.J.: Writing integrative literature reviews: using the past and present to explore the future. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 15(4), 404–428 (2016)
Walden, I., Christou, T.A.: Legal and regulatory implications of disruptive technologies in emerging market economies. SSRN Electron. J. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3230674
Wall, J.D., Stahl, B.C., Salam, A.F.: Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: an empirical example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37 (2015). Article 11. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03711
Williamson, O.E.: The institutions of governance. Am. Econ. Rev. 88(2), 75–79 (1998)
Ziaie, P.: Challenges and issue of ICT industries in developing countries. In: International Conference on Computer Applications Technology, Sousse, Tunisiam 20–22 January 2013. IEEE Xplore (2013)
Zwahr, T., Rossel, P., Finger, M.: Towards electronic governance: a case study of ICT in local government governance. In: The National Conference on Digital Government Research (dg. o2005) (No. CONF) (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chigwedere, C., Takavarasha, S., Chisaka, B. (2022). Regulatory Frameworks in Developing Countries: An Integrative Literature Review. In: Kreps, D., Davison, R., Komukai, T., Ishii, K. (eds) Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination. HCC 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15687-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15688-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)