Abstract
In July 2021, East Japan Railway Company introduced a face recognition function to some of its security cameras. However, the company was criticized by society for not fully disclosing its detailed operation policy, and later withdrew some of its operations. Recently, Japan has seen an increase in the number of indiscriminate killings and injuries on trains, and there are growing calls for the need for AI-based countermeasures against suspicious persons. Therefore, why did East Japan Railway Company receive social criticism? In this paper, I would like to clarify the reasons and explore the ideal form of legal regulation for facial recognition systems used by private entities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ministry of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism (MLIT), guidebook on the handling of personal data in one id service using face recognition technology at airports. https://www.mlit.go.jp/report/press/content/001332966.pdf
East Japan railway company, efforts to improve railway security for the Tokyo 2020 olympic and paralympic games. https://www.EastJapanRailwayCompany.co.jp/press/2021/20210706_ho02.pdf
Tokyo metropolitan government, “A New Tokyo” created by citizens first: an action plan for 2020. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tokyo2020_suishin_honbu/kanjikai/dai7/sankou.pdf
Masako WAKAE, more transparency needed with facial recognition technology, The Japan News, Sep 1, 2021 at 3
East Japan railway company’s facial recognition watch list attracts scrutiny / Targeted individuals set to include ex-prisoners, The Japan News, 22 Sep 2021 at 1
The personal information protection commission, QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS on the “Guidelines for the act on the protection of personal information” and the “Handling of personal data leaks and other incidents. https://www.ppc.go.jp/personalinfo/faq/2009_APPI_QA/
Makoto IBUSUKI, “Identifying the faces of all passengers with surveillance cameras,” What was wrong with East Japan railway company’s system for detecting people leaving prison?, President Online, 29 Oct 2021. https://president.jp/articles/-/51210?page=1
Ferguson, A.G.: Facial recognition and the fourth amendment. Minn. L. Rev. 1105, 197-1198 (2021)
Japan federation of bar associations, opinion on statutory regulations on the use of facial recognition systems by public and private sector organizations and incorporated administrative agencies. https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/document/opinionpapers/210916.html
Japan federation of bar associations, chairman’s statement calling for the discontinuation of the use of facial recognition systems by railroad operators. https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/document/statement/year/2021/211125.html
The information commissioner’s. office, information commissioner’s opinion: the use of live facial recognition technology in public places. https://ico.org.uk/media/2619985/ico-opinion-the-use-of-lfr-in-public-places-20210618.pdf
Komukai, T.: Privacy protection in the criminal investigations on the personal data held by third parties. J. Inf. Commun. Policy 4(1), 63–80 (2020). https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000719095.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ozaki, A. (2022). The Use of Live Facial Recognition Technology by Private Entities in Public Places: A Study of Recent Case in Japan. In: Kreps, D., Davison, R., Komukai, T., Ishii, K. (eds) Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination. HCC 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15687-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15688-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)