Skip to main content

The Use of Live Facial Recognition Technology by Private Entities in Public Places: A Study of Recent Case in Japan

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination (HCC 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 656))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 377 Accesses

Abstract

In July 2021, East Japan Railway Company introduced a face recognition function to some of its security cameras. However, the company was criticized by society for not fully disclosing its detailed operation policy, and later withdrew some of its operations. Recently, Japan has seen an increase in the number of indiscriminate killings and injuries on trains, and there are growing calls for the need for AI-based countermeasures against suspicious persons. Therefore, why did East Japan Railway Company receive social criticism? In this paper, I would like to clarify the reasons and explore the ideal form of legal regulation for facial recognition systems used by private entities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ministry of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism (MLIT), guidebook on the handling of personal data in one id service using face recognition technology at airports. https://www.mlit.go.jp/report/press/content/001332966.pdf

  2. East Japan railway company, efforts to improve railway security for the Tokyo 2020 olympic and paralympic games. https://www.EastJapanRailwayCompany.co.jp/press/2021/20210706_ho02.pdf

  3. Tokyo metropolitan government, “A New Tokyo” created by citizens first: an action plan for 2020. https://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/tokyo2020_suishin_honbu/kanjikai/dai7/sankou.pdf

  4. Masako WAKAE, more transparency needed with facial recognition technology, The Japan News, Sep 1, 2021 at 3

    Google Scholar 

  5. East Japan railway company’s facial recognition watch list attracts scrutiny / Targeted individuals set to include ex-prisoners, The Japan News, 22 Sep 2021 at 1

    Google Scholar 

  6. The personal information protection commission, QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS on the “Guidelines for the act on the protection of personal information” and the “Handling of personal data leaks and other incidents. https://www.ppc.go.jp/personalinfo/faq/2009_APPI_QA/

  7. Makoto IBUSUKI, “Identifying the faces of all passengers with surveillance cameras,” What was wrong with East Japan railway company’s system for detecting people leaving prison?, President Online, 29 Oct 2021. https://president.jp/articles/-/51210?page=1

  8. Ferguson, A.G.: Facial recognition and the fourth amendment. Minn. L. Rev. 1105, 197-1198 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Japan federation of bar associations, opinion on statutory regulations on the use of facial recognition systems by public and private sector organizations and incorporated administrative agencies. https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/en/document/opinionpapers/210916.html

  10. Japan federation of bar associations, chairman’s statement calling for the discontinuation of the use of facial recognition systems by railroad operators. https://www.nichibenren.or.jp/document/statement/year/2021/211125.html

  11. The information commissioner’s. office, information commissioner’s opinion: the use of live facial recognition technology in public places. https://ico.org.uk/media/2619985/ico-opinion-the-use-of-lfr-in-public-places-20210618.pdf

  12. Komukai, T.: Privacy protection in the criminal investigations on the personal data held by third parties. J. Inf. Commun. Policy 4(1), 63–80 (2020). https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000719095.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimi Ozaki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ozaki, A. (2022). The Use of Live Facial Recognition Technology by Private Entities in Public Places: A Study of Recent Case in Japan. In: Kreps, D., Davison, R., Komukai, T., Ishii, K. (eds) Human Choice and Digital by Default: Autonomy vs Digital Determination. HCC 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 656. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15688-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15688-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics