Skip to main content

Tunas - Fishing for Diverse Answer Sets: A Multi-shot Trade up Strategy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2022)

Abstract

Answer set programming (ASP) solvers have advanced in recent years, with a variety of different specialisation and overall development. Thus, even more complex and detailed programs can be solved. A side effect of this development are growing solution spaces and the problem of how to find those answer sets one is interested in. One general approach is to give an overview in form of a small number of highly diverse answer sets. By choosing a favourite and repeating the process, the user is able to leap through the solution space. But finding highly diverse answer sets is computationally expensive. In this paper we introduce a new approach called Tunas for Trade Up Navigation for Answer Sets to find diverse answer sets by reworking existing solution collections. The core idea is to collect diverse answer sets one after another by iteratively solving and updating the program. Once no more answer sets can be added to the collection, the program is allowed to trade answer sets from the collection for different answer sets, as long as the collection grows and stays diverse. Elaboration of the approach is possible in three variations, which we implemented and compared to established methods in an empirical evaluation. The evaluation shows that the Tunas approach is competitive with existing methods, and that efficiency of the approach is highly connected to the underlying logic program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\Gamma \) \(^{\,n\bar{\uparrow }}_{\!{{\mathcal {P}\!\Delta }}}\) asks for \(\subseteq \)-maximal sets and restricts the maximal value to bound output size.

  2. 2.

    This implication even holds if S and \(S'\) share elements (\(S\cap {}S'\ne \emptyset \)) or if \( \Delta (S) < k\).

  3. 3.

    Not all timelines cover the same k due to the time limit, distorting the mean value. The median is robust against those outliers by setting missing data to the time limit.

References

  1. Abels, D., Jordi, J., Ostrowski, M., Schaub, T., Toletti, A., Wanko, P.: Train scheduling with hybrid answer set programming. TPLP 21(3), 317–347 (2021)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alviano, M., et al.: The ASP System DLV2. In: Balduccini, M., Janhunen, T. (eds.) LPNMR 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10377, pp. 215–221. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61660-5_19

  3. Alviano, M., Dodaro, C.: Anytime answer set optimization via unsatisfiable core shrinking. TPLP 16(5–6), 533–551 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Alviano, M., Dodaro, C., Faber, W., Leone, N., Ricca, F.: WASP: a native ASP solver based on constraint learning. In: Cabalar, P., Son, T.C. (eds.) LPNMR 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8148, pp. 54–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40564-8_6

  5. Alviano, M., Romero, J., Schaub, T.: Preference relations by approximation. In: Thielscher, M., Toni, F., Wolter, F. (eds.) Proceedings of KR 2018, pp. 2–11. AAAI Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brewka, G., Delgrande, J.P., Romero, J., Schaub, T.: asprin: Customizing answer set preferences without a headache. In: Bonet, B., Koenig, S. (eds.) Proceedings of AAAI 2015, pp. 1467–1474. AAAI Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Böhl, E., Gaggl, S.A.: Tunas - Fishing for diverse Answer Sets: a Multi- Shot Trade up Strategy (Tool & Experiments), June 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6762554

  8. Dimopoulos, Y., Nebel, B., Koehler, J.: Encoding planning problems in nonmonotonic logic programs. In: Steel, S., Alami, R. (eds.) ECP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1348, pp. 169–181. Springer, Heidelberg (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63912-8_84

  9. Eiter, T., Erdem, E., Erdogan, H., Fink, M.: Finding similar/diverse solutions in answer set programming. Theory Pract. Log. Program. 13(3), 303–359 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Eiter, T., Falkner, A.A., Schneider, P., Schüller, P.: Asp-based signal plan adjustments for traffic flow optimization. In: Giacomo, G.D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of ECAI 2020, FAIA, vol. 325, pp. 3026–3033. IOS Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erdem, E., Lifschitz, V.: Transformations of logic programs related to causality and planning. In: Gelfond, M., Leone, N., Pfeifer, G. (eds.) LPNMR 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1730, pp. 107–116. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46767-X_8

  12. Faber, W.: An introduction to answer set programming and some of its extensions. In: Manna, M., Pieris, A. (eds.) Reasoning Web 2020. LNCS, vol. 12258, pp. 149–185. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60067-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Fichte, J.K., Gaggl, S.A., Rusovac, D.: Rushing and strolling among answer sets - navigation made easy. In: Proceedings of AAAI 2022 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Kaufmann, B., Schaub, T.: Multi-shot asp solving with clingo. TPLP 19(1), 27–82 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gebser, M., Kaminski, R., Schaub, T.: Complex optimization in answer set programming. TPLP 11(4–5), 821–839 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Kaminski, R., Ostrowski, M., Schaub, T., Schneider, M.: Potassco: the potsdam answer set solving collection. AI Commun. 24(2), 107–124 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Gebser, M., Maratea, M., Ricca, F.: The seventh answer set programming competition: design and results. TPLP 20(2), 176–204 (2020)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Kowalski, R., Bowen, Kenneth (eds.) Proceedings of International Logic Programming Conference and Symposium, pp. 1070–1080. MIT Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gençay, E., Schüller, P., Erdem, E.: Applications of non-monotonic reasoning to automotive product configuration using answer set programming. J. Intell. Manuf. 30(3), 1407–1422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1333-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorczyca, P.: Configuration Problem ASP Encoding Generator (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5777217

  21. Janhunen, T., Kaminski, R., Ostrowski, M., Schellhorn, S., Wanko, P., Schaub, T.: Clingo goes linear constraints over reals and integers. TPLP 17(5–6), 872–888 (2017)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kahraman, M.K., Erdem, E.: Personalized course schedule planning using answer set programming. In: Alferes, J.J., Johansson, M. (eds.) PADL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11372, pp. 37–45. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05998-9_3

  23. Romero, J., Schaub, T., Wanko, P.: Computing diverse optimal stable models. In: Carro, M., King, A., Saeedloei, N., Vos, M.D. (eds.) TC of ICLP 2016. OASIcs, vol. 52, pp. 3:1–3:14. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Soininen, T., Niemelä, I.: Developing a declarative rule language for applications in product configuration. In: Gupta, G. (ed.) PADL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1551, pp. 305–319. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49201-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Soininen, T., Niemelä, I., Tiihonen, J., Sulonen, R.: Representing configuration knowledge with weight constraint rules. In: Provetti, A., Son, T.C. (eds.) Proceedings of ASP 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in project 389792660 (TRR 248, Center for Perspicuous Systems), and by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) in project 01IS20056_NAVAS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Böhl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Böhl, E., Gaggl, S.A. (2022). Tunas - Fishing for Diverse Answer Sets: A Multi-shot Trade up Strategy. In: Gottlob, G., Inclezan, D., Maratea, M. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15707-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15706-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15707-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics