Skip to main content

Effectiveness of Brush Operational Parameters for Robotic Debris Removal

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2022)

Abstract

Surface decontamination is essential in Nuclear Gloveboxes; moving this process from manual to robotic would reduce the risk to operators. Towards the development of robotic and autonomous sweeping systems, brushing debris removal effectiveness is evaluated using visual inspection. In addition, three types of dry simulacrum debris were used: flour, sand, and metallic swarf, each with different particle sizes and friction properties. We evaluate the debris removal effectiveness for each operational brush parameter and debris type. The tested operational brush parameters were the brush angle of attack and the brush penetration with the help of a robotic manipulator arm repeating a slow and steady rectangle sweeping pattern. We found that the brush angle of attack has a higher impact than the brush penetration. Also, flour is fast to remove from a surface and necessitates 80\(^{\circ }\) angle of attack. For sand particles, a 70\(^{\circ }\) angle of attack gives the best configuration to create a contact surface. Regarding debris like metallic swarf, debris particles to bristles bonding must be limited, requiring a 90\(^{\circ }\) angle of attack. These results allowed us to determine that autonomous robotic systems must adapt brushing operative parameters to debris type for an effective debris removal process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdel Wahab, M.M., Wang, C., Vanegas Useche, L.V., Parker, G.: Finite element models for brush-debris interaction in road sweeping. Acta Mech. 215(1–4), 71–84 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-010-0304-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bayliss, C.R., Langley, K.F.: Chapter 11 - dismantling techniques. In: Nuclear Decommissioning, Waste Management, and Environmental Site Remediation, pp. 99–111. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067744-8/50014-X, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978075067744850014X

  3. Bayliss, C., Langley, K.: Decontamination techniques. In: Bayliss, C.R., Langley, K.F. (eds.) Nuclear Decommissioning, Waste Management, and Environmental Site Remediation, pp. 89–97. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-075067744-8/50013-8, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780750677448500138

  4. Bormann, R., Hampp, J., Hagele, M.: New brooms sweep clean - an autonomous robotic cleaning assistant for professional office cleaning. In: Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 2015-June, no. June, pp. 4470–4477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139818

  5. Duroudier, J.P.: Mechanical characteristics of divided solids. Divided Solids Mech. 1–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78548-187-1.50001-3

  6. Kanegsberg, B.: Handbook for Critical Cleaning, vol. 105 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-0576(07)80159-0

  7. Leidner, D.S.: Cognitive reasoning for compliant robot manipulation. Doctoral thesis, p. 211 (2019). http://www.springer.com/series/5208

  8. Office for Nuclear Regulation: NS-INSP-GD-053 - Criticality Safety, pp. 1–29 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Okada, K., Kojima, M., Sagawa, Y., Ichino, T., Sato, K., Inaba, M.: Vision based behavior verification system of humanoid robot for daily environment tasks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, HUMANOIDS, pp. 7–12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHR.2006.321356

  10. Peel, G., Michielen, M., Parker, G.: Some aspects of road sweeping vehicle automation. In: IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, AIM, vol. 1, pp. 337–342 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1109/aim.2001.936477

  11. Regulation, N.: Investigation into the thermal oxide reprocessing plant (THORP) contamination event (August 2016), pp. 1–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snead, L.L., Zinkle, S.J.: Use of beryllium and beryllium oxide in space reactors. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 746, pp. 768–775 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1867196

  13. Sri Vishva, R., Naresh, R., Venkada Krishnan, M.S.: An autonomous cleaning robot. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Systems, ICAIS 2021, pp. 686–691 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIS50930.2021.9395909

  14. Sun, G., et al.: Task-oriented impedance control for integrated autonomous cleaning manipulator. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2019, pp. 358–363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBIO49542.2019.8961483

  15. Tokatli, O., et al.: Robot-assisted glovebox teleoperation for nuclear industry. Robotics 10(3), 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10030085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vanegas-Useche, L.V., Abdel-Wahab, M.M., Parker, G.A.: Effectiveness of oscillatory gutter brushes in removing street sweeping waste. Waste Manag. 43, 28–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.05.014

  17. Virji, M.A., et al.: Characteristics of beryllium exposure to small particles at a beryllium production facility. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55(1), 70–85 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, C.: Brush modelling and control techniques for automatic debris removal during road sweeping. Ph.D. thesis, University of Surrey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ye, G., Alterovitz, R.: Guided motion planning. In: Christensen, H., Khatib, O. (eds.) Robotics Research. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, vol. 100, pp. 291–307. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29363-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has been supported by the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority and the RAIN Hub, funded by the Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund, part of the government’s modern Industrial Strategy. The fund is delivered by UK Research and Innovation and managed by EPSRC [EP/R026084/1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bechir Tabia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tabia, B., Zoulias, I., Burroughes, G. (2022). Effectiveness of Brush Operational Parameters for Robotic Debris Removal. In: Pacheco-Gutierrez, S., Cryer, A., Caliskanelli, I., Tugal, H., Skilton, R. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13546. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15908-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15908-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15908-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics