Skip to main content

Contradiction Detection Approach Based on Semantic Relations and Evidence of Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13501))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The automatic detection of contradictions or the detection of contradictory statements consists in identifying the discrepancies, inconsistencies, conflicts and disagreement in a given text. This technique has several applications in the real world; as in question-and-answer systems, multi-document synthesis, and contradictions of opinions analysis in social networks. The automatic detection of contradictions is a technically difficult natural language processing problem, given the variety of ways in which contradictions occur between texts. Indeed, even if brutal negations, antonyms and numerical mismatches are obvious characteristics to diffuse contradictions, there can be a contradiction which also comes from an inconsistent domain knowledge, from uncertain coreferences or from differences in the structures of the assertions.

In this paper, we address the problem of detecting contradictions for uncertain statements when the user (author) not only provides factual information, but also clues about its plausibility. Therefore, we propose a contradiction detection approach which introduces additional criteria for detecting linguistic semantic features due to natural language ambiguity and evidence of uncertainty. The idea is to build a model to detect contradictions using a joint analysis of semantic relations and evaluations of uncertainties. In order to validate our proposed approach, we are carrying out experiments on four data sets. The results based on the experiments indicate the effectiveness of our approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    WordNet is an electronic lexical database that covers the majority of nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs in the English language.

  2. 2.

    http://alt.qcri.org/semeval2014/.

  3. 3.

    https://nlp.stanford.edu/projects/contradiction/.

References

  1. Adler, B.T., et al.: Assigning trust to Wikipedia content. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Wikisym, pp. 1–12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asif, I., et al.: Using nanopublications to detect and explain contradictory research claims. In: 2021 IEEE 17th International Conference on eScience (eScience), pp. 1–10. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Best, E.C., Fellowship, N.: Alan Ritter: Software EngineerBest, vol. 2007 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chklovski, T., Pantel, P.: VerbOcean: mining the web for fine-grained semantic verb relations. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 33–40 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Marneffe, M.-C., Rafferty, A.N., Manning, C.D.: Finding contradictions in text. In: Proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pp. 1039–1047 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diao, Y., et al.: A multi-dimension question answering network for sarcasm detection. In: IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 135152–135161 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ennals, R., Trushkowsky, B., Agosta, J.M.: Highlighting disputed claims on the web. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 341–350 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fader, A., Soderland, S., Etzioni, O.: Identifying relations for open information extraction. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1535–1545 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harabagiu, S.M., Hickl, A., Lacatusu, V.F.: Negation, contrast and contradiction in text processing. In: AAAI, pp. 755–762 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kharrat, A.E., Hlaoua, L.: New information retrieval approach based on semantic indexing by meaning (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lendvai, P., Reichel, U.: Contradiction detection for rumorous claims. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02588 (2016)

  12. Lingam, V., et al.: Deep learning for conflicting statements detection in text. PeerJ Prepint(2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Padó, S., et al.: Deciding entailment and contradiction with stochastic and edit distance-based alignment. In: TAC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Park, S., et al.: NewsCube: delivering multiple aspects of news to mitigate media bias. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 443–452 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pham, M.Q.N., Le Nguyen, M., Shimazu, A.: Using shallow semantic parsing and relation extraction for finding contradiction in text (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid, H.: Treetagger (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shih, C., et al.: Validating contradiction in texts using online co-mention pattern checking. In: ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing (TALIP), vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tsytsarau, M., Palpanas, T., Denecke, K.: Scalable detection of sentiment-based contradictions. DiversiWeb, WWW 2011, vol. 1, pp. 9–16 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ala Eddine Kharrat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kharrat, A.E., Hlaoua, L., Ben Romdhane, L. (2022). Contradiction Detection Approach Based on Semantic Relations and Evidence of Uncertainty. In: Nguyen, N.T., Manolopoulos, Y., Chbeir, R., Kozierkiewicz, A., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13501. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16014-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16014-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16013-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16014-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics