Skip to main content

Impact of Image Sensor Output Data on Power Consumption of the Image Processing System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 542))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Nowadays, image sensors are widely used for industrial or augmented and virtual reality (AR)/(VR) applications. Often, multiple sensors are used and the host platform needs to process each high resolution image frame with low latency. Therefore, the processing units and the communication have a big impact on the power consumption of the image processing system. This paper describes a method to simulate a smart image sensor and the impact of different output resolutions on the image processing system. In-sensor processing is simulated, by sending different image resolutions to the host platform, where a shape matching algorithm was processed. It shows an analysis of the power consumption of the communication from the sensor with region-of-interest (ROI) data to the host and the energy consumption of the whole image processing system with a Mira220 and an Nvidia Jetson Nano. The power consumption of the MIPI interface can be reduced by over 83% for ROIs smaller than 640\(\,\times \,\)480. Furthermore, the system energy consumption can be reduces by 18% at 90 fps and 21% at 60 fps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano-developer-kit.

  2. 2.

    https://www.mipi.org/.

References

  1. Silva, R., Rudek, M., Szejka, A., Canciglieri, J.O.: Machine vision systems for industrial quality control inspections. In: 15th IFIP WG 5.1 International Conference, Turin, Italy (2018). ISBN: 978-3-030-01613-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01614-2_58

  2. Zhou, W., Fei, M., Zhou, H., Li, K.: A sparse representation based fast detection method for surface defect detection of bottle caps. Neurocomputing 123, 406–414 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Horputra, P., Phrajonthong, R., Kaewprapha, P.: deep learning-based bottle caps inspection in beverage manufacturing and packaging process. In: 2021 9th International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON), pp. 499–502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/iEECON51072.2021.9440326

  4. Manzano, J., Bolaños, T., Muñoz, M., Arenas, V., Orozco, H.: Evaluation of a Machine Vision System Applied to Quality Control in a Liquid Filling, Lid and Labeling Line for Bottles, pp. 140–154, October (2020). ISBN: 978-3-030-62553-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62554-2_11

  5. Huang, S.-H., Pan, Y.-C.: Automated visual inspection in the semiconductor industry: a survey. Comput. Ind. 66, 1–10 (2015). ISSN: 0166–3615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2014.10.006

  6. Tripathi, M., Maktedar, D.: A role of computer vision in fruits and vegetables among various horticulture products of agriculture fields: a survey. Inf. Process. Agric. 7 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.07.003

  7. Liu, C., Hall, M., De Nardi, R., Trail, N., Newcombe, R.: Sensors for future VR applications. In: 2017 International Image Sensor Workshop (IISW), pp. 250–253 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, C., Berkovich, A., Chen, S., Reyserhove, H., Sarwar, S.S., Tsai, T.-H.: Intelligent vision systems - bringing human-machine interface to AR/VR. In: 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 10.5.1–10.5.4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM19573.2019.8993566

  9. Sony Corporation: Sony to Release World’s First Intelligent Vision Sensors with AI Processing Functionality. https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/News/Press/202005/20-037E/, 14 May 2020. Accessed 22 July 2021

  10. Sony Group Corporation: Sony’s Latest Image Sensors and the Technologies that Lies Behind Them. https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/technology/stories/imagesensor7tech/, 15 October 2020. Accessed 22 July 2021]

  11. Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation: Imaging and Sensing Technology. https://www.sony-semicon.co.jp/e/technology/imaging-sensing/. 18 February 2021. Accessed 22 July 2021

  12. Pinkham, R., Schmidt, T., Berkovich, A.: Algorithm-aware neural network based image compression for high-speed imaging. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR), pp. 196–199, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, December (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00040

  13. Pinkham, R., Berkovich, A., Zhang, Z.: Near-sensor distributed DNN processing for augmented and virtual reality. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Circ. Syst. 4(4), 663–676 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2021.3121259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Howard, A., et al.: Searching for MobileNetV3. In: IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1314–1324 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2019.00140

  15. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

  16. Holly, S., Wendt, A., Lechner, M.: Profiling energy consumption of deep neural networks on NVIDIA Jetson Nano. In: 2020 11th International Green and Sustainable Computing Workshops (IGSC), pp. 1–6, Pullman, WA, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/IGSC51522.2020.9290876

  17. ams AG: Jetcis evaluation platform for mira sensor family quick start guide. https://ams.com/documents/20143/4421878/JetCis_QG001006_1-00.pdf. 4 February 2021. Accessed 22 September 2021

  18. Nvidia Cooperation: Jetson Nano Development Kit. https://docs.nvidia.com/jetson/l4t/index.html#page/Tegra%20Linux%20Driver%20Package%20Development%20Guide/power_management_nano.html. 3 August 2021. Accessed 14 October 2021

  19. Nvidia Cooperation: Jetson Nano Developer Kit User Guide. https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano-developer-kit. 15 January 2020. Accessed 24 September 2021

  20. Fiala, G., Loinig, J., Steger, C.: Evaluation of an integer optimized shape matching algorithm. In: 2021 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), pp. 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/SAS51076.2021.9530015

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by ams-OSRAM AG, Premstaetten, Austria. Thank you very much for the support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gernot Fiala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fiala, G., Loining, J., Steger, C. (2023). Impact of Image Sensor Output Data on Power Consumption of the Image Processing System. In: Arai, K. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 542. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16072-1_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics