Abstract
Decomposition of soil organic carbon (SOC) is an important part of the global carbon cycle, and is connected to multiple ecological processes. A comprehensive understanding of the process and subsequent improvement of soil management practices is an important step in developing sustainable agriculture and other land uses. This can not only increase the quality and productivity of arable lands, but also reduce carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere.
Currently developed SOC models are characterized by the multitude of considered factors: biological and physical processes, chemical reactions, influence of weather, crop and soil conditions. The importance of subsoil carbon also has been recognized, and a number of layered SOC models emerged. As decomposition of organic matter depends greatly on the soil physical characteristics such as moisture and temperature, these layered carbon models require corresponding estimates to remain consistent.
In this study, we take the RothPC-1 layered carbon decomposition model, and supply it with a comprehensive physical soil water and heat flow model. The two models are interconnected in a way that the carbon model uses the estimates of soil moisture and temperature from the moisture model, and the physical soil properties are then modified according to the simulated content of organic matter.
The model simulations were conducted for three sites in Ukraine. The experiment covered a period between 2010 and 2020 and involved only data from the open datasets. The results demonstrate the behavior of layered soil carbon decomposition model under different climate conditions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bashir, O., et al.: Soil organic matter and its impact on soil properties and nutrient status. In: Dar, G.H., Bhat, R.A., Mehmood, M.A., Hakeem, K.R. (eds.) Microbiota and Biofertilizers, Vol 2, pp. 129–159. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61010-4_7
Canty, J., Frischling, B., Frischling, D.: Weatherbase (2022). http://www.weatherbase.com/
Cardinael, R., Guenet, B., Chevallier, T., Dupraz, C., Cozzi, T., Chenu, C.: High organic inputs explain shallow and deep SOC storage in a long-term agroforestry system - combining experimental and modeling approaches. Biogeosciences 15(1), 297–317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-297-2018
Chen, W., Shen, H., Huang, C., Li, X.: Improving soil moisture estimation with a dual ensemble Kalman smoother by jointly assimilating AMSR-E brightness temperature and MODIS LST. Remote Sens. 9(3), 273 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030273
Cherlinka, V.: Models of soil fertility as means of estimating soil quality. Geogr. Cassoviensis 10, 131–147 (2016)
Chui, Y., Moshynskyi, V., Martyniuk, P., Stepanchenko, O.: On conjugation conditions in the filtration problems upon existence of semipermeable inclusions. JP J. Heat Mass Transf. 15(3), 609–619 (2018). https://doi.org/10.17654/HM015030609
Coleman, K., Jenkinson, D.: RothC-26.3 - a Model for the turnover of carbon in soil, vol. 38, pp. 237–246 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61094-3_17
Conant, R., et al.: Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates - synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Glob. Change Biol. 17(11), 3392–3404 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02496.x
Del Grosso, S., et al.: Modeling Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics for Soil Management, pp. 303–332. CRC Press (2001)
Giardina, C., Litton, C., Crow, S., Asner, G.: Warming-related increases in soil CO2 efflux are explained by increased below-ground carbon flux. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 822–827 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2322
Hersbach, H., et al.: Operational global reanalysis: progress, future directions and synergies with NWP. ERA Report 27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21957/tkic6g3wm, https://www.ecmwf.int/node/18765
Hilinski, T.E.: Implementation of exponential depth distribution of organic carbon in the CENTURY model (2001). https://www2.nrel.colostate.edu/projects/irc/public/Documents/Software/Century5/Reference/html/Century/exp-c-distrib.htm
Ise, T., Moorcroft, P.: The global-scale temperature and moisture dependencies of soil organic carbon decomposition: an analysis using a mechanistic decomposition model. Biogeochemistry 80, 217–231 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9019-5
Jenkinson, D., Coleman, K.: The turnover of organic carbon in subsoils. part 2. modelling carbon turnover. Europ. J. Soil Sci. 59, 400–413 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01026.x
Kashtan, V., Hnatushenko, V., Zhir, S.: Information technology analysis of satellite data for land irrigation monitoring : Invited paper. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Information and Telecommunication Technologies and Radio Electronics (UkrMiCo), pp. 1–4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/UkrMiCo52950.2021.9716592
Kerr, D., Ochsner, T.: Soil organic carbon more strongly related to soil moisture than soil temperature in temperate grasslands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 84(2), 587–596 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20018
Kirschbaum, M.: The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27(6), 753–760 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(94)00242-S
Kozhushko, O., Boiko, M., Kovbasa, M., Martyniuk, P., Stepanchenko, O., Uvarov, M.: Evaluating predictions of the soil moisture model with data assimilation by the triple collocation method. Compu. Sci. Appl. Math. 2, 25–35 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2413-6549-2021-2-03
Kozhushko, O., Boiko, M., Kovbasa, M., Martyniuk, P., Stepanchenko, O., Uvarov, M.: Field scale computer modeling of soil moisture with dynamic nudging assimilation algorithm. Math. Model. Comput. 9(2), 203–216 (2022). https://doi.org/10.23939/mmc2022.02.203
Krinner, G., et al.: A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 19(1), GB1015 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199
Kroes, J., Roelsma, J.: ANIMO 3.5; user’s guide for the ANIMO version 3.5 nutrient leaching model. Wageningen, SC-DLO, 1998. Techn. Doc. 46, 98 pp. (1998)
Langergraber, G., Rousseau, D., Garcia, J., Mena, J.: CWM1: a general model to describe biokinetic processes in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Sci. Technol. 59(9), 1687–1697 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.131
Lei, J., Guo, X., Zeng, Y., Zhou, J., Gao, Q., Yang, Y.: Temporal changes in global soil respiration since 1987. Nat. Commun. 12, 403 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20616-z
Li, C., Farahbakhshazad, N., Jaynes, D., Dinnes, D., Salas, W., McLaughlin, D.: Modeling nitrate leaching with a biogeochemical model modified based on observations in a row-crop field in Iowa. Ecol. Model. 196, 116–130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.02.007
Luo, Z., Luo, Y., Wang, G., Xia, J., Peng, C.: Warming-induced global soil carbon loss attenuated by downward carbon movement. Glob. Change Biol. 26(12), 7242–7254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15370
Parton, W., Ojima, D., Cole, C., Schimel, D.: A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management, pp. 147–167. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. (1994). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub39.c9
Parton, W., Scurlock, J., Ojima, D., Gilmanov, T., Scholes, R., Schimel, D., Kirchner, T., Menaut, J.C., Seastedt, T., Moya, G., Kamnalrut, A., Kinyamario, J.: Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 7(4), 785–809 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB02042
Peralta, G., Di Paolo, L., Omuto, C., Viatkin, K., Luotto, I., Yigini, Y.: Global soil organic carbon sequestration potential map technical manual (2020). https://fao-gsp.github.io/GSOCseq/index.html
Poggio, L., et. al.: Soilgrids 2.0 : producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. Soil 7(1), 217–240 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021
USDA NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service): Interpreting the soil conditioning index: a tool for measuring soil organic matter trends, no. 16 (2003). https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_053273.pdf
Shelia, V., Simunek, J., Boote, K., Hoogenbooom, G.: Coupling DSSAT and HYDRUS-1D for simulations of soil water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 66(2), 232–245 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0055
Shibu, M., Leffelaar, P., Van Keulen, H., Aggarwal, P.: Quantitative description of soil organic matter dynamics - a review of approaches with reference to rice-based cropping systems. Geoderma 137(1), 1–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.08.008
Shibu, M., Leffelaar, P., van Keulen, H., Aggarwal, P.: LINTUL3, a simulation model for nitrogen-limited situations: application to rice. Eur. J. Agron. 32(4), 255–271 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2010.01.003
Stepanchenko, O., Shostak, L., Kozhushko, O., Moshynskyi, V., Martyniuk, P.: Modelling soil organic carbon turnover with assimilation of satellite soil moisture data. In: Modeling, Control and Information Technologies: Proceedings of International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 97–99, no. 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31713/MCIT.2021.31
Taghizadeh-Toosi, A., Christensen, B., Hutchings, N., Vejlin, J., Katterer, T., Glendining, M., Olesen, J.: C-TOOL: a simple model for simulating whole-profile carbon storage in temperate agricultural soils. Ecol. Model. 292, 11–25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.016
Thea, C.: Lametsy – large meteorological system (2022). https://lametsy.pp.ua
Wójcik, W., Osypenko, V., Osypenko, V., Lytvynenko, V., Askarova, N., Zhassandykyzy, M.: Hydroecological investigations of water objects located on urban areas. Environmental Engineering V. In: Proceedings of the 5th National Congress of Environmental Engineering, pp. 155–160 (2017)
Xie, E., Zhang, X., Lu, F., Peng, Y., Chen, J., Zhao, Y.: Integration of a process-based model into the digital soil mapping improves the space-time soil organic carbon modelling in intensively human-impacted area. Geoderma 409, 115599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115599
Yang, J., Yang, J., Dou, S., Hoogenboom, G.: Simulating the effect of long-term fertilization on maize yield and soil C/N dynamics in northeastern China using DSSAT and CENTURY-based soil model. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 95, 287–303 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9563-z
Yoder, D., et al.: Soil health: meaning, measurement, and value through a critical zone lens. J. Soil Water Conserv. 77(1), 88–99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2022.00042
Zhang, X., Xie, Z., Ma, Z., Barron-Gafford, G., Scott, R., Niu, G.Y.: A microbial-explicit soil organic carbon decomposition model (MESDM): development and testing at a semiarid grassland site. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 14(1), e2021MS002485 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002485
Zhou, J., Cheng, G., Wang, G.: Numerical modeling of wheat irrigation using coupled HYDRUS and WOFOST models. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76, 648–662 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0467
Zhou, X., Xu, X., Zhou, G., Luo, Y.: Temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon decomposition increased with mean carbon residence time: field incubation and data assimilation. Glob. Change Biol. 24(2), 810–822 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13994
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stepanchenko, O., Shostak, L., Moshynskyi, V., Kozhushko, O., Martyniuk, P. (2023). Simulating Soil Organic Carbon Turnover with a Layered Model and Improved Moisture and Temperature Impacts. In: Babichev, S., Lytvynenko, V. (eds) Lecture Notes in Data Engineering, Computational Intelligence, and Decision Making. ISDMCI 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16203-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16203-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16202-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16203-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)