Abstract
During recent decades, technologies have been widely available for educational institutions, being just one step in the long process of adoption and integration. Despite the number of studies focusing on the adoption of technologies in education, they often focus on teachers’ perspectives, leaving out students’ perceptions. Given that student learning is the cornerstone of technology-enhanced learning, this oversight is a serious drawback in promoting fruitful integration of technology in education. In this paper, we have tracked the use of over 6000 digital learning resources in the authentic setting of secondary schools in Estonia. Using qualitative analysis of open answers by teachers about their teaching practices and a structural equation modelling of school students’ reactions to these teaching practices, we uncovered several influencing factors of students’ perceived usefulness and experiences of using Digital Learning Resources (DLRs). Results show that similar to teachers, the use of DLRs presents students with new challenges that they need to adapt to in their learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
OECD: ICT resources in school education: what do we know from OECD work? OECD (2020)
Fullan, M., Langworthy, M.: A Rich Seam: How New Pedagogies Find Deep Learning. Pearson, London (2014)
Cuban, L.: Why so many structural changes in schools and so little reform in teaching practices. J. Educ. Adm. 51(2), 109–125 (2013)
Toh, Y.: Leading sustainable pedagogical reform with technology for student-centered learning: a complexity perspective. J. Educ. Change 17, 145–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9273-9
Glover, I., Hepplestone, S., Parkin, H., Rodger, H., Irwin, B.: Pedagogy first: realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 47(5), 993–1002 (2016)
Genlott, A., Grönlund, A.Å., Viberg, O.: Disseminating digital innovation in school – leading second- order educational change. Educ. Inf. Technol. 24, 3021–3039 (2019)
Rolfe, V.E., Alcocer, M., Bentley, E., Milne, D. Meyer-Sahling, J.: Academic staff attitudes towards electronic learning in arts and sciences. Eur. J. Open Dist. Learn. (EURODL) 1–6 (2008)
Mohammadi, F., Abrizah, A., Nazari, M., Attaran, M.: What motivates high school teachers to use web-based learning resources for classroom instruction? An exploratory case study in an Iranian smart school. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 373–381 (2015)
Ley, T., Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E.M., Leoste, J., Hallik, M., Poom-Valickis, K.: Adopting technology in schools: modelling, measuring and supporting knowledge appropriation. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1937113
Aru-Chabilan, H.: Tiger Leap for digital turn in the Estonian education. Educ. Media Int. 57(1), 61–72 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2020.1744858
Beckman, K., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L.: Understanding students’ use and value of technology for learning. Learn. Media Technol. 39(3), 346–367 (2014)
Stork, M.G.: Implementing a digital learning initiative: a case study in K-12 classrooms. J. Format. Design Learn. 2(1), 36–48 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0013-1
Pepin, B., Gueudet, G., Yerushalmy, M., Trouche, L., Chazan, D.: E-textbooks in/for teaching and learning mathematics: a disruptive and potentially transformative educational technology. In: English, L., Kirshner, D. (eds.) Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, 3rd edn., pp.636–661. Taylor & Francis (2015)
Hamel, C.J., Ryan-Jones, D.: Designing instruction with learning objects. Int. J. Educ. Technol. 3(1), 111–124 (2002)
Merrill, M.D.: First principles of instruction. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 50(3), 43–59 (2006)
Churchill, D.: Learning object: an interactive representation and a mediating tool in a learning activity. Educ. Media Int. 42(4), 333–349 (2005)
Lonka, K.: Phenomenal Learning from Finland. Edita Publishing (2018)
Lafuente, M.: Attuning pedagogies to the context of ‘new learners’ and technology. In: Understanding Innovative Pedagogies: Key Themes to Analyse New Approaches to Teaching and Learning. OECD Working paper nr 172 (2018)
OECD: How computers are related to students’ performance. In: Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, pp. 145–164. OECD (2015)
Corrin, L., Kennedy, G., Mulder, R.: Enhancing learning analytics by understanding the needs of teachers. In: Proceedings of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education 30th Annual Conference (ASCILITE 2013), Sydney, Australia, pp. 201–205 (2013)
Taber, K.S.: The role of new educational technology in teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective on digital learning. In: Marcus-Quinn, A., Hourigan, T. (eds.) Handbook on digital learning for K-12 schools, pp. 397–412. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33808-8_24
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications (2013)
Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., Wetzels, M.: Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Plan. 45(5–6), 359–394 (2012)
Chin, W.W., Peterson, R.A., Brown, P.S.: Structural equation modelling in marketing: some practical reminders. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 16(4), 287–298 (2008)
Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L.M., Ringle, C.M.: Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I—method. Eur. Bus. Rev. 28(1), 63–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2015-0094
Ghasemy, M., Teeroovengadum, V., Becker, J.-M., Ringle, C.M.: This fast car can move faster: a review of PLS-SEM application in higher education research. High. Educ. 80, 1121–1152 (2020)
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 43(1), 115–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications (2017)
Hu, L.-T., Bentler, P.M.: Fit Indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol. Methods 3(4), 424–453 (1998)
Dijkstra, T.K., Henseler, J.: Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 81(1), 10–23 (2015)
Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Psychology Press (1988)
Sailer, M., Murböck, J., Fischer, F.: Digital learning in schools: what does it take beyond digital technology? Teach. Teach. Educ. 103, 103346 (2021)
Sailer, M., et al.: Technology-related teaching skills and attitudes: validation of a scenario-based self-assessment instrument for teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 115, 106625 (2021)
Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., Duckworth, D.: Preparing for Life in a Digital Age. IEA, Amsterdam (2019)
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the ETAG-funded grant PRG1634 and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement No. 669074.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tammets, K., Sarmiento-Márquez, E.M., Khulbe, M., Laanpere, M., Ley, T. (2022). Integrating Digital Learning Resources in Classroom Teaching: Effects on Teaching Practices and Student Perceptions. In: Hilliger, I., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., De Laet, T., Ortega-Arranz, A., Farrell, T. (eds) Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16289-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16290-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)