Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Analysis of Age Sage Classification for Students’ Social Engagement Using REPTree and Random Forest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence in Data Science (ICCIDS 2022)

Part of the book series: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology ((IFIPAICT,volume 654))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Study and analysis of train dataset along with various ML algorithms is used widely in different sectors. The accuracy parameters can be clarified to have prediction of different score levels. This study covers the extension work of Students’ social engagement during covid-19 pandemic. The study was initiated with students’ social connection during the pandemic. We had compared various machine learning algorithms with its performance about the engagement of students in various social network. After studied, analyzed & compared, we derived that the most of students’ social engagement found in WhatsApp, YouTube & Instagram. The current study is foreseeing age wise social media connection. It correlates between student & their social engagement during the pandemic phase. In which age group, which social media is one of the most popular one. This study focuses on age wise classification using Machine Learning. In this paper, the decision-making classification is compared. The Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPTree) and Random Forest algorithm is implemented on train dataset with diverse nodes. The attributes are focused as age & time spent on social media as per necessity of study. This paper includes the study and analysis of RAE & RMSE along with ML tree approach. The discoveries of this study can lead better classification in regards of students’ age and duration which they have spent on social media for derived social platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prajapati, J.B., Patel, S.K.: Performance comparison of machine learning algorithms for prediction of students’ social engagement. In: 2021 5th International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC), 8 April 2021, pp. 947–951. IEEE (22021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sheela, Y.J., Krishnaveni, S.H.: A comparative analysis of various classification trees. In: 2017 International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), pp. 1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCPCT.2017.8074403

  3. Shubho, S.A., Razib, M.R.H., Rudro, N.K., Saha, A.K., Khan, M.S.U., Ahmed, S.: Performance analysis of NB tree, REP tree and random tree classifiers for credit card fraud data. In: 2019 22nd International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), pp. 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIT48885.2019.9038578

  4. Classification using REPTree. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manag. Stud. 2(10), 155–160 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anguita, D., Ghio, A., Greco, N., Oneto, L., Ridella, S.: Model selection for support vector machines: advantages and disadvantages of the machine learning theory. In: The 2010 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2010.5596450

  6. Yang, L., Wu, H., Jin, X., Zheng, P., Hu, S., Xu, X., et al.: Study of cardiovascular disease prediction model based on random forest in eastern China. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 5245 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ubels, J., Schaefers, T., Punt, C., Guchelaar, H.J., de Ridder, J.: RAINFOREST: a random forest approach to predict treatment benefit in data from (failed) clinical drug trials. Bioinformatics 36(Suppl_2), i601–i9 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Santos, F., Graw, V., Bonilla, S.: A geographically weighted random forest approach for evaluate forest change drivers in the Northern Ecuadorian Amazon. PLoS ONE 14(12), e0226224 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanko, M., Grendár, M., Snopko, P., Opšenák, R., Šutovský, J., Benčo, M., et al.: Random forest-based prediction of outcome and mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing primary decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg. 148, e450–e458 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavey, T.G., Gilson, N.D., Gomersall, S.R., Clark, B., Trost, S.G.: Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data. J. Sci. Med. Sport 20(1), 75–80 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh, E.S., Kreakie, B.J., Cantwell, M.G., Nacci, D.: A Random Forest approach to predict the spatial distribution of sediment pollution in an estuarine system. PLoS ONE 12(7), e0179473 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishwaran, H., Lu, M.: Standard errors and confidence intervals for variable importance in random forest regression, classification, and survival. Stat. Med. 38(4), 558–582 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Salas, E.A.L., Subburayalu, S.K.: Modified shape index for object-based random forest image classification of agricultural systems using airborne hyperspectral datasets. PLoS ONE 14(3), e0213356 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jahandideh, S., Jaroszewski, L., Godzik, A.: Improving the chances of successful protein structure determination with a random forest classifier. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 70(Pt 3), 627–635 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, F.C., Plewes, R., Murison, L., MacDougall, M.J., Sinclair, S., Davies, C., et al.: Random forests as cumulative effects models: a case study of lakes and rivers in Muskoka, Canada. J. Environ. Manag. 201, 407–24 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, S., Bhattarai, R., Cooke, R.A., Verma, S., Huang, X., Markus, M., et al.: Relative performance of different data mining techniques for nitrate concentration and load estimation in different type of watersheds. Environ. Pollut. (Barking, Essex: 1987) 263(Pt A), 114618 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mohan, S., Saranya, P.: A novel bagging ensemble approach for predicting summertime ground-level ozone concentration. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. (1995) 69(2), 220–33 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman, M., Chen, N., Elbeltagi, A., Islam, M.M., Alam, M., Pourghasemi, H.R., et al.: Application of stacking hybrid machine learning algorithms in delineating multi-type flooding in Bangladesh. J. Environ. Manag. 295, 113086 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goya-Jorge, E., Amber, M., Gozalbes, R., Connolly, L., Barigye, S.J.: Assessing the chemical-induced estrogenicity using in silico and in vitro methods. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 87, 103688 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Saha, S., Saha, M., Mukherjee, K., Arabameri, A., Ngo, P.T.T., Paul, G.C.: Predicting the deforestation probability using the binary logistic regression, random forest, ensemble rotational forest, REPTree: a case study at the Gumani River Basin, India. Sci. Total Environ. 730, 139197 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Acharya Motibhai Patel Institute of Computer Studies, Ganpat University, Gujarat, India

    Jigna B. Prajapati

Authors
  1. Jigna B. Prajapati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jigna B. Prajapati .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    Lekshmi Kalinathan

  2. Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    Priyadharsini R.

  3. Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    Madheswari Kanmani

  4. Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai, India

    Manisha S.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Prajapati, J.B. (2022). Analysis of Age Sage Classification for Students’ Social Engagement Using REPTree and Random Forest. In: Kalinathan, L., R., P., Kanmani, M., S., M. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Data Science. ICCIDS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 654. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16364-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16364-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16363-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16364-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships