Abstract
Cyber-physical systems, or Cyber-physical production systems in the manufacturing domain, are considered a fundamental technological enabler on the industry 4.0 revolution. In fact, these are interconnected physical and virtual components that provide real time monitoring on the manufacturing execution, for an intelligent management and advanced decision-making to ensure efficiency and reactivity improvement. Traditionally, on manufacturing operation, performance management systems have managed production by piloting the operations towards the expected objectives. However, this approach is limited on cyber physical systems due to the following difficulties: a) synchronous and asynchronous behavior on a real time context causing an unsuitable periodic calculation of performance indicators; and b) human limitations for real-time decision-making due to the complexity of problem and need of prompt analysis and action during execution. The main objective of this paper is to characterize five possible localizations of a potential performance management mechanism on the architectural arrangement of cyber-physical production systems, ranging from traditional centralized to distributed approaches. The purpose of this study is to assess the possible localizations of this mechanism thought the main performance steps including the objectives and results definition, the execution monitoring, the current state analysis, the performance reporting and the launching of the corrective actions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gawankar, S.A., Gunasekaran, A., Kamble, S.: A study on investments in the big data-driven supply chain, performance measures and organisational performance in Indian retail 4.0 context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(5), 1574–1593 (2020)
Žižek, S.Š., Nedelko, Z., Mulej, M., Čič, Ž.V.: Key performance indicators and Industry 4.0 – a socially responsible perspective. Naše Gospod. Econ. 66(3), 22–35 (2020)
Singh, H.: Big data, industry 4.0 and cyber-physical systems integration: a smart industry context. Mater Today Proc. 46, 157–162 (2021)
Monostori, L., et al.: Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. CIRP Ann. 65(2), 621–641 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.005
Arsene, C.G., Constantin, G.: Industry 4.0: key questions in manufacturing. MATEC Web Conf. (2019)
Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A.: Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58(1), 65–86 (2020)
Cardin, O.: Contribution à la conception, l’évaluation et l’implémentation de systèmes de production cyber-physiques (2017)
Bakkari, M., Khatory, A.: Industry 4.0: strategy for more sustainable industrial development in SMEs, p. 9 (2017)
Nagy, J., Oláh, J., Erdei, E., Máté, D., Popp, J.: The role and impact of Industry 4.0 and the internet of things on the business strategy of the value chain—the case of Hungary. Sustainability 10(10), 3491 (2018)
Gallo, T., Santolamazza, A.: Industry 4.0 and human factor: how is technology changing the role of the maintenance operator? Procedia Comput. Sci. 180, 388–393 (2021)
Lee, J., Lapira, E., Yang, S., Kao, A.: Predictive manufacturing system - trends of next-generation production systems. IFAC Proc. 46(7), 150–156 (2013)
Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., Cagnazzo, L.: Performance measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Meas. Bus. Excell. 14(1), 4–18 (2010)
Vernadat, F., Shah, L., Etienne, A., Siadat, A.: VR-PMS: a new approach for performance measurement and management of industrial systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(23–24), 7420–7438 (2013)
Neely, A., Adams, C., Crowe, P.: The performance prism in practice. Meas. Bus. Excell., 6–13 (2001)
Kang, N., Zhao, C., Li, J., Horst, J.A.: A hierarchical structure of key performance indicators for operation management and continuous improvement in production systems. Int. J. Prod. Res 21, 6333–6350 (2016)
Ante, G., Facchini, F., Mossa, G., Digiesi, S.: Developing a key performance indicators tree for lean and smart production systems. IFAC-Pap. 51(11), 13–18 (2018)
Sorooshian, S.: Study on unbalanceness of the balanced scorecard. Appl. Math. Sci. 8, 4163–4169 (2014). https://doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.45337
Sorooshian, S., Aziz, N.F., Ahmad, A., Jubidin, S.N., Mustapha, N.M.: Review on performance measurement systems. Mediterr. J. Soc. Sci. (2015)
Sangwa, N.R., Sangwan, K.S.: Development of an integrated performance measurement framework for lean organizations. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 29(1), 41–84 (2018)
Sarraf, F., Nejad, S.H.: Improving performance evaluation based on balanced scorecard with grey relational analysis and data envelopment analysis approaches: case study in water and wastewater companies. Eval. Program. Plann. 79, 101762 (2020)
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Balanc. Scorec. 11 (1992)
Doumeingts, G., Clave, F., Ducq, Y.: ECOGRAI — a method to design and to implement performance measurement systems for industrial organizations — concepts and application to the maintenance function. In: Rolstadås, A. (ed.) Benchmarking — Theory and Practice. IAICT, pp. 350–368. Springer, Boston, MA (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34847-6_39
Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S., McDevitt, L.: Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 17(5), 522–534 (1997)
Kamble, S.S., Gunasekaran, A., Raut, R.: A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs-a review and empirical investigation. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 107853 (2020)
Gamache, S., Abdul-Nour, G., Baril, C.: Development of a digital performance assessment model for Quebec manufacturing SMEs. Procedia Manuf. 38, 1085–1094 (2019)
Calış Duman, M., Akdemir, B.: A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 167, 120615 (2021)
Bueno, A., Godinho Filho, M., Frank, A.G.: Smart production planning and control in the Industry 4.0 context: a systematic literature review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 149, 106774 (2020)
Hizam-Hanafiah, M., Soomro, M.A., Abdullah, N.L.: Industry 4.0 readiness models: a systematic literature review of model dimensions. Information 11(7), 364 (2020)
Büchi, G., Cugno, M., Castagnoli, R.: Smart factory performance and Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 150, 119790 (2020)
Mörth, O., Emmanouilidis, C., Hafner, N., Schadler, M.: Cyber-physical systems for performance monitoring in production intralogistics. Comput. Ind. Eng. 142, 106333 (2020)
Morella, P., Lambán, M.P., Royo, J.A., Sánchez, J.C.: The importance of implementing cyber physical systems to acquire real-time data and indicators. J 4(2), 147–153 (2021)
Ribeiro, L.: Cyber-physical production systems’ design challenges. In: 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Edinburgh, United Kingdom, June 2017, pp. 1189–1194 (2017)
Jiménez, J.-F.: Dynamic and hybrid architecture for the optimal reconfiguration of control systems: application to manufacturing control (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ouazzani-Chahidi, A., Jimenez, JF., Berrah, L., Loukili, A. (2022). Towards an Inclusion of a PMS-Based Mechanism for Cyber-Physical Production Systems. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 663. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16406-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16407-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
