Skip to main content

Abstract

Complexity in a manufacturing system can lead to unnecessary costs due to an increase in manufacturing uncertainty that negatively affects the reliability and controllability of the system. Despite the importance of understanding complexity in manufacturing, the conceptualization of complexity for an additive manufacturing (AM) system and its impact on operational performance have not been clearly articulated in the literature. As a response, this study characterizes a complexity measure relevant to AM and identifies the impact of the complexity on operational performance in an AM system. For this, design complexity for AM is defined by considering both the volume ratio and area ratio of a part design. Then, a virtual AM plant for aircraft parts is built by a discrete event simulation to derive the average order lead time of each part design. A linear regression analysis is performed to understand the impact of the calculated design complexity on the AM performance. As a result, this study shows that design complexity negatively affects the average order lead time of the AM system. The findings from this study indicate that the design aspects of complexity for an AM based system should be properly managed to improve its operational performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu, Y., Frizelle, G., Efstathiou, J.: A study on the cost of operational complexity in customer–supplier systems. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106(1), 217–229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park, K., Okudan Kremer, G.E.: Assessment of static complexity in design and manufacturing of a product family and its impact on manufacturing performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 169, 215–232 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.036

  3. Frizelle, G.: Getting the measure of complexity. Manuf. Eng. 75(6), 268–270 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, W., Mac, G., Tsoutsos, N.G., Gupta, N., Karri, R.: Computer aided design (CAD) model search and retrieval using frequency domain file conversion. Addit. Manuf. 36, 101554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stern, A., Rosenthal, Y., Dresler, N., Ashkenazi, D.: Additive manufacturing: an education strategy for engineering students. Addit. Manuf. 27, 503–514 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.001

  6. Conner, B.P., et al.: Making sense of 3-D printing: creating a map of additive manufacturing products and services. Addit. Manuf. 1, 64–76 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pradel, P., Bibb, R., Zhu, Z., Moultrie, J.: Complexity is not for free the impact of component complexity on additive manufacturing build time. In: Rapid Design, Prototyping & Manufacturing (RDPM 2017), Newcastle, pp. 1–7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Valentan, B., Brajlih, T., Drstvenšek, I., Balič, J.: Development of a part complexity evaluation model for application in additive fabrication technologies. Strojniški vestnik J. Mech. Eng. 57(10), 709–718 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2010.057

  9. Johnson, M.D., Valverde, L.M., Thomison, W.D.: An investigation and evaluation of computer-aided design model complexity metrics. Comput.-Aid. Des. Appl. 15(1), 61–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2017.1353729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fera, M., Macchiaroli, R., Fruggiero, F., Lambiase, A.: A new perspective for production process analysis using additive manufacturing—complexity vs production volume. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 95(1–4), 673–685 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1221-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joshi, A., Anand, S.: Geometric complexity based process selection for hybrid manufacturing. In: 45th SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference, Los Angeles, pp. 578–589 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.056

  12. Baumers, M., Tuck, C., Wildman, R., Ashcroft, I., Hague, R.: Shape complexity and process energy consumption in electron beam melting: a case of something for nothing in additive manufacturing? J. Ind. Ecol. 21(S1), S157–S167 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, R., Imani, F., Reutzel, E., Yang, H.: From design complexity to build quality in additive manufacturing—a sensor-based perspective. IEEE Sens. Lett. 3(1), 1–4 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/lsens.2018.2880747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Joshi, D., Ravi, B.: Quantifying the shape complexity of cast parts. Comput.-Aid. Des. Appl. 7(5), 685–700 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2010.685-700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thingiverse. https://www.thingiverse.com

  16. Simplify3D® version 4.1. https://www.simplify3d.com/software/release-notes/version-4-1-0/

  17. Kim, K., Noh, H., Park, K., Jeon, H.W., Lim, S.: Characterization of power demand and energy consumption for fused filament fabrication using CFR-PEEK. Rapid Prototyp. J. 28(7), 1394–1406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-07-2021-0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Apium P220 datasheet. https://apiumtec.com/en/case-studies-datasheets

  19. SIMIO 11. https://www.simio.com/software/simulation-software.php.

  20. Makexyz. https://www.makexyz.com

  21. Minitab 20.3. https://www.minitab.com/en-us/products/minitab/

  22. Yang, S., Zhao, Y.F.: Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 80(1–4), 327–342 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. NRF-2022R1C1C1012140) for Kijung Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kijung Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, K., Park, K., Jeon, H.W. (2022). The Impact of Design Complexity on Additive Manufacturing Performance. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 663. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16406-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16407-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics