Skip to main content

A Two-Phased Approach to Energy Consumption Prediction for Fused Filament Fabrication of CFR-PEEK

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action (APMS 2022)

Abstract

With increasing attention on fused filament fabrication (FFF) applications for high-performance polymers, understanding the energy characteristics of FFF is critical to pursue a sustainable additive manufacturing system. In this regard, this study proposes a two-phased energy prediction approach to FFF. A full factorial design of experiments for FFF is planned to collect data for build time, filament volume, and energy consumption by varying major process parameters (i.e., layer thickness, infill density, and printing speed). Carbon fiber reinforced polyether-ether-ketone (CFR-PEEK), which is an emerging high-performance polymer for advanced engineering applications, is used for a material of the experiments. In the first phase, two machine learning methods (i.e., decision tree and random forest) are employed to estimate the material addition rate (MAR) of FFF, which indicates the amount of deposited material volume per unit time. Then, a statistical regression model of energy consumption on the estimated MAR is built to predict the energy consumption of FFF for CFR-PEEK. The results show that the decision tree model has better prediction performance to predict the MAR of FFF than the random forest model. In addition, the energy consumption model through the predicted MAR shows that an increase in the MAR reduces energy consumption. The two-phased prediction approach based on the MAR provides better performance than the direct energy prediction from process parameters through a machine learning technique. The findings of this study provide a basis to characterize energy dynamics in FFF for CFR-PEEK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lunetto, V., Priarone, P.C., Galati, M., Minetola, P.: On the correlation between process parameters and specific energy consumption in fused deposition modelling. J. Manuf. Process. 56, 1039–1049 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Park, K., Kim, G., No, H., Jeon, H.W., Okudan Kremer, G.E.: Identification of optimal process parameter settings based on manufacturing performance for fused filament fabrication of CFR-PEEK. Appl. Sci. 10(13), 4630 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134630

  3. Kim, K., Noh, H., Park, K., Jeon, H.W., Lim, S.: Characterization of power demand and energy consumption for fused filament fabrication using CFR-PEEK. Rapid Prototyp. J. 28(7), 1394–1406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-07-2021-0188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mognol, P., Lepicart, D., Perry, N.: Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyp. J. 12(1), 26–34 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540610637246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Ghamdi, K.A.: Sustainable FDM additive manufacturing of ABS components with emphasis on energy minimized and time efficient lightweight construction. Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf. 2(4), 338–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.05.004

  6. Elkaseer, A., Schneider, S., Scholz, S.G.: Experiment-based process modeling and optimization for high-quality and resource-efficient FFF 3D printing. Appl. Sci. 10(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082899. Article 2899

  7. Galetto, M., Verna, E., Genta, G.: Effect of process parameters on parts quality and process efficiency of fused deposition modeling. Comput. Ind. Eng. 156, 107238 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Peng, T., Yan, F.: Dual-objective analysis for desktop FDM printers: energy consumption and surface roughness. Procedia CIRP 69, 106–111 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, Z., et al.: Investigation of energy requirements and environmental performance for additive manufacturing processes. Sustainability 10(10), 3606 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thingiverse. https://www.thingiverse.com

  11. Simplify 3D. www.simplify3d.com/software/release-notes/version-4-1-2

  12. Apium. https://apiumtec.com/download/apium-p220-datasheet

  13. Apium. https://apiumtec.com/download/apium-cfr-peek-datasheet

  14. Adpower. https://bit.ly/3LOZm3S

  15. Wei, Y., et al.: A review of data-driven approaches for prediction and classification of building energy consumption. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 82, 1027–1047 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, W., Wu, C., Li, Y., Wang, L., Samui, P.: Assessment of pile drivability using random forest regression and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Georisk Assessment Manage. Risk Eng. Syst. Geohaz. 15(1), 27–40 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2019.1674340

  17. Minitab. https://www.minitab.com/en-us/products/minitab

  18. Scikit-learn. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/supervised_learning.html#supervised-learning

  19. Gutowski, T.G., Branham, M.S., Dahmus, J.B., Jones, A.J., Thiriez, A., Sekulic, D.P.: Thermodynamic analysis of resources used in manufacturing processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(5), 1584–1590 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/es8016655

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2022R1C1C1012140) for Kijung Park.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kijung Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Noh, H., Park, K., Kremer, G.E. (2022). A Two-Phased Approach to Energy Consumption Prediction for Fused Filament Fabrication of CFR-PEEK. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 663. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16407-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16406-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16407-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics