Skip to main content

Abstract

To ensure the farmer follows up on the new consumer demand for pork traceability and welfare during production, we developed a concept of applying the good practices during on-farm pig production. The productive meat sector has undergone technological transformations in recent years by searching for products with better quality, social responsibility, and sustainability. The worldwide good-practice norms are already known, and further information is already published by breeders, technical manuals, and scientific papers. New advancements in information and communication tools (ITC) can allow farmers to access real-time farm data and check their compliance with the established good-practices norms. The present study aims to conceptualize a digital solution suitable for evaluating the compliance of the pig farming management conditions. A mobile application will be made based on the standards of good practices as a digital transformation. The producer will be able to continuously check in real-time through the mobile application, assuring that his herd complies with the worldwide standards during production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pandolfi, F., Stoddart, K., Wainwright, N., Kyriazakis, I., Edwards, S.: The ‘Real Welfare’ scheme: benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs. Animal 11(10), 1816–1824 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. . Wilson, M.: Heat stress, trace minerals and gut health. Revista Pig Progress (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lara, L.J., Rostagno, M.H.: Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals 3(2), 356–369 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Lankveld, A., Schaumberger, S.: How to overcome heat stress in Pigs. Revista Pig Progress, vol. 31, no. 5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mikovits, C., et al.: Impacts of global warming on confined livestock systems for growing-fattening pigs: simulation of heat stress for 1981 to 2017 in central Europe. Int. J. Biometeorol. 63(2), 221–230 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-018-01655-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galvão, A.T., da Silva, A.D.S.L., Pires, A.P., de Morais, A.F.F., Neto, J.S.N.M., de Azevedo, H.H.F.: Bem-estar animal na suinocultura: Revisão. Pubvet 13, 148 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dalla Costa, O.A., Ludke, J.V., Costa, M.J.R.P., Faucitano, L., Peloso, J.V., Dalla Roza, D.: Efeito das condições pré-abate sobre a qualidade da carne de suínos pesados. Archivos de Zootecnia 59(227), 391–402 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farm Animal Welfare Council. Farm animal welfare in Great Britain: Past, present and future, pp. 1–59 (2009). http://www.fawc.org.uk. Accessed 5 Apr 2022

  9. Verma, P., Sinha, N.: Integrating perceived economic well-being to technology acceptance model: the case of mobile based agricultural extension service. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 126, 207–216 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shi, C., Zhang, J., Teng, G.: Mobile measuring system based on LabVIEW for pig body components estimation in a large-scale farm. Comput. Electron. Agric. 156, 399–405 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Benjamin, M., Yik, S.: Precision livestock farming in swine welfare: a review for swine practitioners. Animals 9(4), 133 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parsons, D.J., Green, D.M., Schofield, C.P., Whittemore, C.T.: Real-time control of pig growth through an integrated management system. Biosyst. Eng. 96, 257–266 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stajnko, D., Brus, M., Hočevar, M.: Estimation of bull live weight through thermographically measured body dimensions. Comput. Electron. Agric. 61, 233–240 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown-Brandl, T.M., et al.: Shepherd. Heat and moisture production of modern swine. ASHRAE 120, 469–489 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Banhazi, T.M., et al.: Precision livestock farming: an international review of scientific and commercial aspects. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 5, 1–9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chen, X., Jia, J., Gao, W., Ren, Y., Tao, S.: Selection of an index system for evaluating the application level of agricultural engineering technology. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 109, 12–17 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Oliveira Júnior, A.J., de Souza, S.R.L., da Cruz, V.F., Vicentin, T.A., Glavina, A.S.G.: Development of an android App to calculate thermal comfort indexes on animals and people. Comput. Electron. Agric. 151, 175–184 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Navas, T.O., et al.: Estresse por calor na produção de frangos de corte. Nutritime 13(1) 2016

    Google Scholar 

  19. Carmona, M.A., Sautua, F.J., Pérez-Hernández, O., Mandolesi, J.I.: AgroDecisor EFC: first Android™ app decision support tool for timing fungicide applications for management of late-season soybean diseases. Comput. Electron. Agric. 144, 310–313 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Google. Android Studio. https://developer.android.com/studio/index.html. Accessed Feb 2022, 2018

  21. De Roo, N., Anderson, J., Krupnik, T.: On-farm trials for development impact? The organization of research and the scaling of agricultural technologies. Exp. Agric., 1–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kamilaris, A., Kartakoullis, A., Prenafeta-Boldú, F.X.: A review on the practice of big data analysis in agriculture. Comput. Electron. Agric. 143, 23–37 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoehle, H., Venkatesh, V.: Mobile application usability: conceptualization and instrument development. MIS Q. 39, 435–472 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. do Amaral, A.L., da Silveira, P.R.S., de Lima, G.J.M.M.: Boas práticas de produção de suínos. Embrapa Suínos e Aves-Circular Técnica (Infoteca-E 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baumüller, H.: Facilitating agricultural technology adoption among the poor: the role of service delivery through mobile phones. ZEF Working Paper Series No. 93 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Raymond, E.S.: A Brief History of Hackerdom. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. O’Reilly & Associates, Sebastopol (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Henrique Ivale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Muachambi, E.G.R., Ivale, A.H., da Silva, R.B.T.R., de Alencar Nääs, I. (2022). Farm Management of Pig Production: Mobile Application Development Concept. In: Kim, D.Y., von Cieminski, G., Romero, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Smart Manufacturing and Logistics Systems: Turning Ideas into Action. APMS 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 664. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16411-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16411-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16410-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16411-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics