Skip to main content

Why Patient Data Cannot Be Easily Forgotten?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022 (MICCAI 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13438))

Abstract

Rights provisioned within data protection regulations, permit patients to request that knowledge about their information be eliminated by data holders. With the advent of AI learned on data, one can imagine that such rights can extent to requests for forgetting knowledge of patient’s data within AI models. However, forgetting patients’ imaging data from AI models, is still an under-explored problem. In this paper, we study the influence of patient data on model performance and formulate two hypotheses for a patient’s data: either they are common and similar to other patients or form edge cases, i.e. unique and rare cases. We show that it is not possible to easily forget patient data. We propose a targeted forgetting approach to perform patient-wise forgetting. Extensive experiments on the benchmark Automated Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge dataset showcase the improved performance of the proposed targeted forgetting approach as opposed to a state-of-the-art method.

R. Su and X. Liu—Contributed equally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is also a connection between edge cases and active learning [20], where one aims to actively label diverse data to bring more information to the model.

  2. 2.

    For our experiments we fix to introduce noise to 1\(\%\) most informative weights (based on extensive experiments) when applying the targeted forgetting.

References

  1. Abadi, M., et al.: Deep learning with differential privacy. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 308–318 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arpit, D., et al.: A closer look at memorization in deep networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 233–242. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, O., et al.: Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37(11), 2514–2525 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buda, M., Maki, A., Mazurowski, M.A.: A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks. Neural Netw. 106, 249–259 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao, Y., Yang, J.: Towards making systems forget with machine unlearning. In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 463–480 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2015.35

  6. Dwork, C., Roth, A., et al.: The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci. 9(3–4), 211–407 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fredrikson, M., Jha, S., Ristenpart, T.: Model inversion attacks that exploit confidence information and basic countermeasures. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1322–1333 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginart, A., Guan, M.Y., Valiant, G., Zou, J.: Making AI forget you: data deletion in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.05012 (2019)

  9. Golatkar, A., Achille, A., Soatto, S.: Eternal sunshine of the spotless net: selective forgetting in deep networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9304–9312 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartley, J., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Unintended memorisation of unique features in neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.10079 (2022)

  11. Jegorova, M., et al.: Survey: leakage and privacy at inference time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01614 (2021)

  12. Kearns, M.: Efficient noise-tolerant learning from statistical queries. J. ACM (JACM) 45(6), 983–1006 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krizhevsky, A., et al.: Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, X., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Have you forgotten? A method to assess if machine learning models have forgotten data. In: Martel, A.L., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2020. LNCS, vol. 12261, pp. 95–105. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59710-8_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, Z., Miao, Z., Zhan, X., Wang, J., Gong, B., Yu, S.X.: Large-scale long-tailed recognition in an open world. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2537–2546 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 1273–1282. PMLR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, Q.P., Low, B.K.H., Jaillet, P.: Variational Bayesian unlearning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sekhari, A., Acharya, J., Kamath, G., Suresh, A.T.: Remember what you want to forget: algorithms for machine unlearning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03279 (2021)

  20. Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shintre, S., Roundy, K.A., Dhaliwal, J.: Making machine learning forget. In: Naldi, M., Italiano, G.F., Rannenberg, K., Medina, M., Bourka, A. (eds.) APF 2019. LNCS, vol. 11498, pp. 72–83. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21752-5_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Thermos, S., Liu, X., O’Neil, A., Tsaftaris, S.A.: Controllable cardiac synthesis via disentangled anatomy arithmetic. In: de Bruijne, M., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2021. LNCS, vol. 12903, pp. 160–170. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87199-4_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Truex, S., Liu, L., Gursoy, M.E., Yu, L., Wei, W.: Demystifying membership inference attacks in machine learning as a service. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 14(6), 2073–2089 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, M., et al.: Evaluation of inference attack models for deep learning on medical data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.00177 (2020)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Edinburgh, the Royal Academy of Engineering and Canon Medical Research Europe by a PhD studentship to Xiao Liu. This work was partially supported by the Alan Turing Institute under EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1. S.A. Tsaftaris acknowledges the support of Canon Medical and the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Research Chairs and Senior Research Fellowships scheme (grant RC-SRF1819\(\backslash \)8\(\backslash \)25) and the [in part] support of the Industrial Centre for AI Research in digitalDiagnostics (iCAIRD, https://icaird.com) which is funded by Innovate UK on behalf of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) [project number: 104690].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruolin Su .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 228 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Su, R., Liu, X., Tsaftaris, S.A. (2022). Why Patient Data Cannot Be Easily Forgotten?. In: Wang, L., Dou, Q., Fletcher, P.T., Speidel, S., Li, S. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022. MICCAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16452-1_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16452-1_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16451-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16452-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics