Skip to main content

Participatory Design for Worker Training in an Industrial Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE 2022)

Abstract

Developing educational designs aimed at upskilling workers in an industrial context provides a unique and complex situation, due to the different perspectives and contexts represented by workers, managers, and educators.

The aim of this study is to better understand how a participatory approach potentially strengthens the development of educational designs aimed at upskilling in industry. This is done by first clarifying the theoretical foundation for applying a participatory approach, and secondly, by investigating six cases from practice in which a participatory approach (ICoED) has been applied.

The findings of this article show that applying a participatory approach seems to strengthen the development of educational designs aimed at an industrial context in terms of commitment, shared understanding, and a better alignment between the various perspectives in the solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W., Helbig, J.: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry: Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative Industrie 4.0. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mahmood, K., et al.: Analysis of Industry 4.0 capabilities: a perspective of educational institutions and needs of industry. In: Towards Sustainable Customization: Bridging Smart Products and Manufacturing Systems, pp. 887–894 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moldovan, L.: State-of-the-art analysis on the knowledge and skills gaps on the topic of industry 4.0 and the requirements for work-based learning in Romania. Proc. Manuf. 32, 294–301 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 5–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Razzouk, R., Shute, V.: What is design thinking and why is it important? Rev. Educ. Res. 82, 330–348 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Janssen, F.J.J.M., Könings, K.D., van Merriënboer, J.J.G.: Participatory educational design: how to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? Eur. J. Educ. 52, 268–279 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geraldes, C.A.S., et al.: Co-design process for upskilling the workforce in the factories of the future. In: IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), 2021-October (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Luck, R.: Dialogue in participatory design. Des. Stud. 24, 523–535 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen, C.T., Dorst, K., Andreasen, M.M.: Problem formulation as a discursive design activity. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 145–156 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dorst, K.: Design problems and design paradoxes. Des. Issues 22, 4–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8, 5–21 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coyne, R.: Wicked problems revisited. Des. Stud. 26, 5–17 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. Codes. Int. J. Cocreat. Des. Arts 10, 5–14 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders, E.B.N.: Useful and critical: the position of research in design. In: Proceedings of Useful and Critical: The Position of Research in Design, p. 9 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Verganti, R.: Design Driven Innovation: Changing The Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Georgsen, M.: Engaging teaching professionals in design for online learning. In: Conole, G., Klobučar, T., Rensing, C., Konert, J., Lavoué, É. (eds.) Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. LNCS, vol. 9307, pp. 115–126. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., Hamilton, A.L.: Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: notes on the gioia methodology. Organ. Res. Methods 16, 15–31 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mainsah, H., Morrison, A.: Participatory design through a cultural lens: insights from postcolonial theory. In: Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Industry Cases, Workshop Descriptions, Doctoral Consortium papers, and Keynote Abstracts, vol. 2, pp. 83–86 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., Woo, Y.: Designing authentic activities in web-based courses. J. Comput. High. Educ. 16, 3–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is part of the FIT4FoF project that has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement n. 820701.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rene Bennyson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bennyson, R., Laursen, E.S. (2022). Participatory Design for Worker Training in an Industrial Context. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13492. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16538-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16538-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16537-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16538-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics