Skip to main content

A Latent Markov Approach for Clustering Contracting Authorities over Time Using Public Procurement Red Flags

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics (SIS 2021)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 406))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Public procurement is a field particularly prone to corrupt acts. In this regard, red flag indicators are developed with the purpose of signalling anomalies and alerting the system for a potential risk of corruption. By exploiting data coming from the Italian National Database of Public Contracts, a set of red flag indicators for the measurement of the risk of corruption in public procurement are computed for a sample of contracting authorities and monitored over time. Afterwards, a latent Markov model for continuous responses is applied to the data at issue, in order to: i. identify groups of contracting administrations (i.e., the model latent states), characterised by different behaviours on the basis of the selected red flags, and ii. estimate the transitions over time across the ascertained groups. Results show that seven profiles of administrations may be highlighted on account of the selected red flags. Among them, four profiles include contracting authorities with indicator values associable to a low risk, whereas one profile can be labelled as the most at-risk one according to the respective indicator means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://dati.anticorruzione.it/.

References

  1. Akaike, H.: Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Second International Symposium on Information Theory, pp. 267–281. Akademinai Kiado (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ANAC: Corruzione sommersa e corruzione emersa in Italia: modalitài di misurazione e prime evidenze empiriche. https://www.anticorruzione.it/portal/rest/jcr/repository/collaboration/Digital%20Assets/anacdocs/Attivita/Pubblicazioni/RapportiStudi/Metodologie-di-misurazione.pdf (2013). Accessed 4 Jan 2022

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson, S., Heywood, P.M.: The politics of perception: use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Polit. Stud. 57(4), 746–767 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bartolucci, F., Farcomeni, A., Pennoni, F.: Latent Markov Models for Longitudinal Data. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolucci, F., Pandolfi, S., Pennoni, F.: LMest: an R package for latent Markov models for longitudinal categorical data. J. Stat. Softw. 81(4), 1–38 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carloni, E.: Misurare la corruzione? Indicatori di corruzione e politiche di prevenzione. Politica del diritto 3, 445–466 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Del Sarto, S.: L’utilizzo dei modelli IRT multidimensionali per la costruzione di profili di studenti. In Falzetti P (ed.): I risultati scolastici: alcune piste di approfondimento - III Seminario “I dati INVALSI: uno strumento per la ricerca”, pp. 93–112. Franco Angeli, Milano (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B 39, 1–22 (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fazekas, M., Tóth, I.J., King, L.P.: An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data. Eur. J. Crim. Policy Res. 22, 369–397 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fazekas, M., Cingolani, L., Tóth, B.: A Comprehensive Review of Objective Corruption Proxies in Public Procurement: Risky Actors, Transactions, and Vehicles of Rent Extraction. Government Transparency Institute Working Paper Series No. GTI-WP/2016:03, Budapest (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fiorino, N., Galli, E.: La corruzione in Italia. Il Mulino, Bologna (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallego, J., Rivero G., Marínez, J.: Preventing rather than punishing: an early warning model of malfeasance in public procurement. Int. J. Forecast. 37(1), 360–377 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gnaldi, M., Del Sarto, S., Falcone, M., Troìa, M.: Measuring corruption. In: Carloni, E., Gnaldi, M. (eds.) Understanding and Fighting Corruption in Europe—From Repression to Prevention, pp. 43–71. Springer Cham (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Golden, M.A., Picci, L.: Proposal for a new measure of corruption, illustrated with data. Econ. Polit. 17(1), 37–75 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Montanari, G.E., Doretti, M., Bartolucci, F.: A multilevel latent Markov model for the evaluation of nursing homes’ performance. Biom. J. 60(5), 962–978 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. OECD: Analytics for Integrity. Data-Driven Approaches for Enhancing Corruption and Fraud Risk Assessments. https://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/analytics-for-integrity.pdf (2019). Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  17. Office Européen de Lutte Anti-Fraude (OLAF): Identifying and Reducing Corruption in Public Procurement in the EU. PwEU Service—Ecoyrs—Utrecht University (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pohle, J., Langrock, R., van Beest, F.M., Schmidt, N.M.: Selecting the number of states in hidden Markov models: pragmatic solutions illustrated using animal movement. J Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 22(3), 270–293 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6, 461–464 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Syakur, M.A., Khotimah, B.K., Rochman, E.M.S., Satoto, B.D.: Integration K-means clustering method and elbow method for identification of the best customer profile cluster. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 335, 012017 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thorndike, R.L.: Who belongs in the family. Psychometrika 267–276 (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Transparency International: Transparency International. CPI Index. https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/CPI2020_Report_EN_0802-WEB-1_2021-02-08-103053.pdf (2020). Accessed 3 Jan 2022

  23. Troìa, M.: Data analysis e costruzione di indicatori di rischio di corruzione per la Banca Dati Nazionale dei Contratti Pubblici. Autoritá Nazionale Anticorruzione ANAC, working paper no. 5 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wiggins, L.M.: Panel Analysis: Latent Probability Models for Attitude and Behaviour Processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1973)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Del Sarto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Del Sarto, S., Coppola, P., Troìa, M. (2022). A Latent Markov Approach for Clustering Contracting Authorities over Time Using Public Procurement Red Flags. In: Salvati, N., Perna, C., Marchetti, S., Chambers, R. (eds) Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics . SIS 2021. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16609-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics