Skip to main content

Abstract

Researchers from normative multi-agent systems increasingly find familiar questions being asked but now in a field called machine ethics. I the invited talk I introduced machine ethics and focused on some overlapping topics of interest for the both field. This extended abstract offers a highlight on where these two fields overlap, where they differ, but foremost why pursuing advancements in both has a direct impact on society today.

Supported by organization x.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer.

  2. 2.

    https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-folly-of-trolleys-ethical-challenges-and-autonomous-vehicles/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.moralmachine.net/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.economist.com/open-future/2020/01/17/digital-disinformation-is-destroying-society-but-we-can-fight-back.

  5. 5.

    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/twitter-content-warning-feature-lets-users-avoid-posts-they-dont-want-to-see/articleshow/89885837.cms.

  6. 6.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/apr/30/elon-musk-why-44bn-vision-for-twitter-could-fall-apart.

References

  1. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: The status of machine ethics: a report from the AAAI symposium. Minds Mach. 17(1), 1–10 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-007-9053-7

  2. Anderson, S.L.: Asimov’s “three laws of robotics” and machine metaethics. AI Soc. 22(4), 477–493 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0094-5

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L., Verhagen, H.: Introduction to normative multiagent systems. Comput. Mathemat. Org. Theory 12(2), 71–79 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-006-9537-7

  4. Brożek, B., Janik, B.: Can artificial intelligences be moral agents? New Ideas in Psychol. 54, 101–106 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.12.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X17300739

  5. Donagan, A.: Consistency in rationalist moral systems. J. Philos. 81(6), 291–309 (1984). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2026371

  6. Etzioni, A., Etzioni, O.: Incorporating ethics into artificial intelligence. J. Ethics 21, 403–418 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fieser, J.: Ethics. In: Boylan, M. (ed.) Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 2161–0002 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gibbs, J.P.: Norms: the problem of definition and classification. Am. J. Sociol. 70(5), 586–594 (1965). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2774978

  9. Horty, J.F.: Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic. J. Philos. Logic 23(1), 35–65 (1994). http://www.jstor.org/stable/30227222

  10. Malle, B.F., Scheutz, M.: When will people regard robots as morally competent social partners? In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 486–491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333667

  11. Malle, B.F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., Cusimano, C.: Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI 2015, pp. 117–124. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2696454.2696458

  12. Moor, J.H.: The nature, importance, and difficulty of machine ethics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21(4), 18–21 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.80

  13. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education, 4 edn. Upper Saddle River (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santos, J.S., Zahn, J.O., Silvestre, E.A., Silva, V.T., Vasconcelos, W.W.: Detection and resolution of normative conflicts in multi-agent systems: a literature survey. In: AAMAS, pp. 1306–1309. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Slavkovik, M.: Automating moral reasoning (invited paper). In: Bourgaux, C., Ozaki, A., Peñaloza, R. (eds.) International Research School in Artificial Intelligence in Bergen, AIB 2022, June 7–11, 2022, University of Bergen, Norway. OASIcs, vol. 99, pp. 6:1–6:13. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2022). https://doi.org/10.4230/OASIcs.AIB.2022.6

  16. Wallach, W., Allen, C.: Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press Inc, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to MultiAgent Systems. 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester(2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marija Slavkovik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Slavkovik, M. (2022). Machine Ethics - Is It Just Normative Multi-agent Systems?. In: Theodorou, A., Nieves, J.C., De Vos, M. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XIV. COINE 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13239. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16617-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16617-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16616-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16617-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics