Skip to main content

Working with Families of Inverse Functions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Computer Mathematics (CICM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13467))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When evaluating or simplifying mathematical expressions, the question arises of how to handle inverse functions. The problem is that for a non-injective function \(f\) \(: D \rightarrow R\), the inverse is generally not a function \(R \rightarrow D\) since there may be multiple pre-images for a given point. The majority of work in this area has fallen into two camps: either the inverse functions, and expressions involving them, are treated as multi-valued objects, or inverse functions are taken to have one principal value. Both these approaches lead to difficulties in evaluation and simplification. It is possible to define the inverse as a function from R to sets of elements of D, but then the algebra of expressions involving the inverse becomes overly complicated. This article extends previous work based on a different approach: instead, the inverse of a function is taken to be a labelled family of functions, with the label specifying the pre-image in the original function’s domain. This convention is already used by some authors for logarithms, but it can be applied more generally. In some cases, the branch indices can appear in identities that give more broadly applicable simplification rules. In this paper we survey how this approach can be applied to elementary functions, including the Lambert W.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When different authors use the same symbol to mean different things, the discussion of notation becomes problematic. For this example, \(\ln \) is a set; \(\ln _0\) is a unique value. Below, we shall change to notation in which \(\ln \) is also a unique value.

  2. 2.

    An antiperiodic function is one for which \(\exists \alpha \) such that \(f(z+\alpha )=-f(z) \), and \(\alpha \) is then the antiperiod. This is a special case of a quasi-periodic function [10], namely one for which \(\exists \alpha ,\beta \) such that \(f(z+\alpha )=\beta f(z)\).

References

  1. Abramowitz, M., Stegun, I.J.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carathéodory, C.: Theory of functions of a complex variable, 2nd edn. Chelsea, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corless, R.M., Davenport, J.H., Jeffrey, D.J., Watt, S.M.: According to Abramowitz and Stegun. SIGSAM Bull. 34, 58–65 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corless, R.M., Jeffrey, D.J.: The unwinding number. Sigsam Bull. 30(2), 28–35 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davenport, J.H.: The challenges of multivalued “Functions’’. In: Autexier, S., et al. (eds.) CICM 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6167, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14128-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeffrey, D.J.: The importance of being continuous. Math. Mag. 67, 294–300 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffrey, D.J., Rich, A.D.: The evaluation of trigonometric integrals avoiding spurious discontinuities. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 20, 124–135 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffrey, D.J., Norman, A.C.: Not seeing the roots for the branches. SIGSAM Bull. 38(3), 57–66 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kahan, W.M.: Branch cuts for complex elementary functions, or, much ado about nothing’s sign bit. In: Powell, M.J.D., Iserles, A. (eds.), The state of the art in numerical analysis: Proceedings of the Joint IMA/SIAM Conference. Oxford University Press, April 1986

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawden, D.F.: Elliptic Functions and Applications, Springer, New York (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3980-0

  11. Lozier, W.D., Olver, F.W.J., Boisvert, R.F.: NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Watt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jeffrey, D.J., Watt, S.M. (2022). Working with Families of Inverse Functions. In: Buzzard, K., Kutsia, T. (eds) Intelligent Computer Mathematics. CICM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16681-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16681-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16681-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics